Jiri Horacek1, Pavol Mikolas2, Jaroslav Tintera3, Tomas Novak4, Tomas Palenicek4, Martin Brunovsky4, Cyril Höschl4, Martin Alda5. 1. The Prague Psychiatric Centre, the Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic and the Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. 2. Prague Psychiatric Centre, Prague, Czech Republic. 3. Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic. 4. The Prague Psychiatric Centre, and the Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. 5. Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic and the Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aberrant amygdala reactivity to affective stimuli represents a candidate factor predisposing patients with bipolar disorder (BD) to relapse, but it is unclear to what extent amygdala reactivity is state-dependent. We evaluated the modulatory influence of mood on amygdala reactivity and functional connectivity in patients with remitted BD and healthy controls. METHODS: Amygdala response to sad versus neutral faces was investigated using fMRI during periods of normal and sad mood induced by autobiographical scripts. We assessed the functional connectivity of the amygdala to characterize the influence of mood state on the network responsible for the amygdala response. RESULTS: We included 20 patients with remitted BD and 20 controls in our study. The sad and normal mood exerted opposite effects on the amygdala response to emotional faces in patients compared with controls (F1,38 = 5.85, p = 0.020). Sad mood amplified the amygdala response to sad facial stimuli in controls but attenuated the amygdala response in patients. The groups differed in functional connectivity between the amygdala and the inferior prefrontal gyrus (p ≤ 0.05, family-wise error-corrected) of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) corresponding to Brodmann area 47. The sad mood challenge increased connectivity during the period of processing sad faces in patients but decreased connectivity in controls. LIMITATIONS: Limitations to our study included long-term medication use in the patient group and the fact that we mapped only depressive (not manic) reactivity. CONCLUSION: Our results support the role of the amygdala-vlPFC as the system of dysfunctional contextual affective processing in patients with BD. Opposite amygdala reactivity unmasked by the mood challenge paradigm could represent a trait marker of altered mood regulation in patients with BD.
BACKGROUND: Aberrant amygdala reactivity to affective stimuli represents a candidate factor predisposing patients with bipolar disorder (BD) to relapse, but it is unclear to what extent amygdala reactivity is state-dependent. We evaluated the modulatory influence of mood on amygdala reactivity and functional connectivity in patients with remitted BD and healthy controls. METHODS: Amygdala response to sad versus neutral faces was investigated using fMRI during periods of normal and sad mood induced by autobiographical scripts. We assessed the functional connectivity of the amygdala to characterize the influence of mood state on the network responsible for the amygdala response. RESULTS: We included 20 patients with remitted BD and 20 controls in our study. The sad and normal mood exerted opposite effects on the amygdala response to emotional faces in patients compared with controls (F1,38 = 5.85, p = 0.020). Sad mood amplified the amygdala response to sad facial stimuli in controls but attenuated the amygdala response in patients. The groups differed in functional connectivity between the amygdala and the inferior prefrontal gyrus (p ≤ 0.05, family-wise error-corrected) of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) corresponding to Brodmann area 47. The sad mood challenge increased connectivity during the period of processing sad faces in patients but decreased connectivity in controls. LIMITATIONS: Limitations to our study included long-term medication use in the patient group and the fact that we mapped only depressive (not manic) reactivity. CONCLUSION: Our results support the role of the amygdala-vlPFC as the system of dysfunctional contextual affective processing in patients with BD. Opposite amygdala reactivity unmasked by the mood challenge paradigm could represent a trait marker of altered mood regulation in patients with BD.
Authors: N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Ahmad R Hariri; Venkata S Mattay; Alessandro Tessitore; Bhaskar Kolachana; Francesco Fera; David Goldman; Michael F Egan; Daniel R Weinberger Journal: Science Date: 2002-07-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Salvatore Torrisi; Teena D Moody; Nathalie Vizueta; Moriah E Thomason; Martin M Monti; Jennifer D Townsend; Susan Y Bookheimer; Lori L Altshuler Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Melissa P López-Larson; Melissa P DelBello; Molly E Zimmerman; Michael L Schwiers; Stephen M Strakowski Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2002-07-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Kristen K Ellard; Aishwarya G Gosai; Emily E Bernstein; Navneet Kaur; Lousia G Sylvia; Joan A Camprodon; Darin D Dougherty; Andrew A Nierenberg; Thilo Deckersbach Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2018-06-02 Impact factor: 4.839