Literature DB >> 25703611

An investigation of outcome expectancies as a predictor of treatment response for combat veterans with PTSD: comparison of clinician, self-report, and biological measures.

Matthew Price1, Jessica L Maples2, Tanja Jovanovic3, Seth D Norrholm3,4, Mary Heekin3, Barbara O Rothbaum3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcome expectancy, or the degree to which a client believes that therapy will result in improvement, is related to improved treatment outcomes for multiple disorders. There is a paucity of research investigating this relation in regards to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Additionally, the bulk of the research on outcome expectancy and treatment outcomes has relied mostly on self-report outcome measures.
METHODS: The relation between outcome expectancy on self-report measures, clinician-rated measures, and two biological indices (fear-potentiated startle and cortisol reactivity) of PTSD symptoms was explored. The sample included combat veterans (N = 116) treated with virtual reality exposure therapy for PTSD.
RESULTS: Results supported a negative association between outcome expectancy and both self-report and clinician-rated symptoms at the conclusion of treatment, but outcome expectancy was related to the magnitude of change during treatment for self-report measures only. Outcome expectancy was unrelated to biological measures of treatment response.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that outcome expectancy may be related to patient and clinician perceptions of outcomes, but not biological indices of outcome for PTSD.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  multilevel modeling; multimodal assessment; outcome expectancy; posttraumatic stress disorder; virtual reality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25703611      PMCID: PMC4437876          DOI: 10.1002/da.22354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Depress Anxiety        ISSN: 1091-4269            Impact factor:   6.505


  39 in total

Review 1.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

Authors:  Philip M Podsakoff; Scott B MacKenzie; Jeong-Yeon Lee; Nathan P Podsakoff
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2003-10

Review 2.  Optimizing inhibitory learning during exposure therapy.

Authors:  Michelle G Craske; Katharina Kircanski; Moriel Zelikowsky; Jayson Mystkowski; Najwa Chowdhury; Aaron Baker
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2007-10-07

3.  Clients' expectancies and their relationship to pretreatment symptomatology and outcome of cognitive-behavioral group treatment for social phobia.

Authors:  S A Safren; R G Heimberg; H R Juster
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1997-08

4.  Pretreatment expectations, interpersonal functioning, and symptoms in the prediction of the therapeutic alliance across supportive-expressive psychotherapy and cognitive therapy.

Authors:  M B Connolly Gibbons; P Crits-Christoph; C de la Cruz; J P Barber; L Siqueland; M Gladis
Journal:  Psychother Res       Date:  2003-03

5.  Cognitive-behavioral treatment of obsessive thoughts: a controlled study.

Authors:  M H Freeston; R Ladouceur; F Gagnon; N Thibodeau; J Rhéaume; H Letarte; A Bujold
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1997-06

6.  Outcome expectancy as a predictor of treatment response in cognitive behavioral therapy for public speaking fears within social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Matthew Price; Page L Anderson
Journal:  Psychotherapy (Chic)       Date:  2011-10-03

Review 7.  Are patient expectations still relevant for psychotherapy process and outcome?

Authors:  Roger P Greenberg; Michael J Constantino; Noah Bruce
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-10

8.  Virtual reality exposure therapy for Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  B O Rothbaum; L F Hodges; D Ready; K Graap; R D Alarcon
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.384

9.  A component analysis of cognitive-behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder and the role of interpersonal problems.

Authors:  T D Borkovec; Michelle G Newman; Aaron L Pincus; Richard Lytle
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2002-04

10.  Affective outcomes of virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and specific phobias: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas D Parsons; Albert A Rizzo
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  2007-07-25
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Psychological Mechanisms of PTSD and Its Treatment.

Authors:  Rebecca K Sripada; Sheila A M Rauch; Israel Liberzon
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  An Examination of Social Support and PTSD Treatment Response During Prolonged Exposure.

Authors:  Matthew Price; Cynthia Luethcke Lancaster; Daniel F Gros; Alison C Legrand; Katherine van Stolk-Cooke; Ron Acierno
Journal:  Psychiatry       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.458

3.  Baseline psychophysiological and cortisol reactivity as a predictor of PTSD treatment outcome in virtual reality exposure therapy.

Authors:  Seth Davin Norrholm; Tanja Jovanovic; Maryrose Gerardi; Kathryn G Breazeale; Matthew Price; Michael Davis; Erica Duncan; Kerry J Ressler; Bekh Bradley; Albert Rizzo; Peter W Tuerk; Barbara O Rothbaum
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2016-05-07

4.  Expectations versus experiences of veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) service dogs: An inductive conventional content analysis.

Authors:  Leanne O Nieforth; Kerri E Rodriguez; Marguerite E O'Haire
Journal:  Psychol Trauma       Date:  2021-02-25

Review 5.  Head-Mounted Virtual Reality and Mental Health: Critical Review of Current Research.

Authors:  Shaun W Jerdan; Mark Grindle; Hugo C van Woerden; Maged N Kamel Boulos
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 4.143

6.  Engagement, Predictors, and Outcomes of a Trauma Recovery Digital Mental Health Intervention: Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Carolyn M Yeager; Charles C Benight
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2022-05-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.