BACKGROUND: Obesity predisposes patients to abdominal wall hernias. Patients undergoing bariatric surgery are not uncommonly found to have ventral hernias. Synchronous ventral hernia repair (S-VHR) has been reported in 2-5% of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Studies reporting on the outcomes of S-VHR are limited by sample size. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of S-VHR on surgical site infection (SSI) rate. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2010 to 2011 was queried using Current Procedural Terminology codes for bariatric surgery. Data on patient demographics, comorbidities, procedural events, and postoperative occurrences were analyzed. Thirty-day mortality and morbidity were assessed. Comparisons between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were performed. RESULTS: We identified 17,117 patients who underwent RYGB or SG. S-VHR was performed in 503 (2.94%) patients. S-VHR was independently associated with SSI (odds ratios (OR) 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.58), but not overall morbidity (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.96-1.86). Four hundred thirty-three patients with RYGB and 70 with SG had S-VHR. Serious morbidity (3.5 vs. 5.7%, p = 0.32) and overall morbidity (8.3 vs. 8.6%, p = 0.942) were similar. After controlling for baseline comorbidities, there was no significant effect of procedure type on SSI (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.05-2.91). CONCLUSIONS: S-VHR is associated with an increase in SSI but not overall morbidity. There is no significant difference in the SSI rate between RYGB and SG. Larger studies are needed to definitively assess a potential difference in the wound infection rate between RYGB and SG.
BACKGROUND: Obesity predisposes patients to abdominal wall hernias. Patients undergoing bariatric surgery are not uncommonly found to have ventral hernias. Synchronous ventral hernia repair (S-VHR) has been reported in 2-5% of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Studies reporting on the outcomes of S-VHR are limited by sample size. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of S-VHR on surgical site infection (SSI) rate. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2010 to 2011 was queried using Current Procedural Terminology codes for bariatric surgery. Data on patient demographics, comorbidities, procedural events, and postoperative occurrences were analyzed. Thirty-day mortality and morbidity were assessed. Comparisons between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were performed. RESULTS: We identified 17,117 patients who underwent RYGB or SG. S-VHR was performed in 503 (2.94%) patients. S-VHR was independently associated with SSI (odds ratios (OR) 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.58), but not overall morbidity (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.96-1.86). Four hundred thirty-three patients with RYGB and 70 with SG had S-VHR. Serious morbidity (3.5 vs. 5.7%, p = 0.32) and overall morbidity (8.3 vs. 8.6%, p = 0.942) were similar. After controlling for baseline comorbidities, there was no significant effect of procedure type on SSI (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.05-2.91). CONCLUSIONS: S-VHR is associated with an increase in SSI but not overall morbidity. There is no significant difference in the SSI rate between RYGB and SG. Larger studies are needed to definitively assess a potential difference in the wound infection rate between RYGB and SG.
Authors: Yaniv Cozacov; Samuel Szomstein; Fernando M Safdie; Emanuele Lo Menzo; Raul Rosenthal Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-12-14 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Konstantinos Spaniolas; Thadeus L Trus; Gina L Adrales; Maureen T Quigley; Walter J Pories; William S Laycock Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2014-02-24 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: P Praveen Raj; P Senthilnathan; R Kumaravel; S Rajpandian; P S Rajan; N Anand Vijay; C Palanivelu Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Alfredo M Carbonell; Cory N Criss; William S Cobb; Yuri W Novitsky; Michael J Rosen Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-09-14 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Hugo Bonatti; Elisabeth Hoeller; W Kirchmayr; G Muhlmann; M Zitt; F Aigner; H Weiss; A Klaus Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Daniel Leonard Chan; Michael Leonard Talbot; Zhuoran Chen; Sebastianus Chang Mo Kwon Journal: ANZ J Surg Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 1.872
Authors: W J Pories; M S Swanson; K G MacDonald; S B Long; P G Morris; B M Brown; H A Barakat; R A deRamon; G Israel; J M Dolezal Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: K K Jensen; B East; B Jisova; M López Cano; G Cavallaro; L N Jørgensen; V Rodrigues; C Stabilini; D Wouters; F Berrevoet Journal: Hernia Date: 2022-02-25 Impact factor: 2.920
Authors: G Sharma; M Boules; S Punchai; A Strong; D Froylich; N H Zubaidah; C O'Rourke; S A Brethauer; J Rodriguez; K El-Hayek; M Kroh Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-08-05 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Emily T Martin; Keith S Kaye; Caitlin Knott; Huong Nguyen; Maressa Santarossa; Richard Evans; Elizabeth Bertran; Linda Jaber Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 3.254