Konstantinos Spaniolas1, Thadeus L Trus2, Gina L Adrales2, Maureen T Quigley2, Walter J Pories3, William S Laycock2. 1. Division of Advanced Laparoscopic, Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina. Electronic address: spaniolask@ecu.edu. 2. Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. 3. Division of Advanced Laparoscopic, Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Even though the U.S. population is aging, outcomes of bariatric surgery in the elderly are not well defined. Current literature mostly evaluates the effects of gastric bypass (RYGB), with paucity of data on sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The objective of this study was to assess 30-day morbidity and mortality associated with laparoscopic SG in patients aged 65 years and over, in comparison to RYGB. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for all patients aged 65 and over who underwent laparoscopic RYGB and SG between 2010 and 2011. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. P value<.05 was considered significant. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported when applicable. RESULTS: We identified 1005 patients. Mean body mass index was 44 ± 7. SG was performed in 155 patients (15.4%). The American Society of Anesthesiology physical classification of 3 or 4 was similar between the 2 groups (82.6% versus 86.7%, P = .173). Diabetes was more frequent in the RYGB group (43.2% versus 55.6%, P = .004). 30-day mortality (0.6% versus 0.6%, OR 1.1, 95% CI .11-9.49), serious morbidity (5.2% versus 5.6%, OR .91, 95% CI .42-0.96), and overall morbidity (9% versus 9.1%, OR 1.0, 95% CI .55-1.81) were similar. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery, SG is not associated with significantly different 30-day outcomes compared to RYGB. Both procedures are followed by acceptably low morbidity and mortality.
BACKGROUND: Even though the U.S. population is aging, outcomes of bariatric surgery in the elderly are not well defined. Current literature mostly evaluates the effects of gastric bypass (RYGB), with paucity of data on sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The objective of this study was to assess 30-day morbidity and mortality associated with laparoscopic SG in patients aged 65 years and over, in comparison to RYGB. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for all patients aged 65 and over who underwent laparoscopic RYGB and SG between 2010 and 2011. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. P value<.05 was considered significant. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported when applicable. RESULTS: We identified 1005 patients. Mean body mass index was 44 ± 7. SG was performed in 155 patients (15.4%). The American Society of Anesthesiology physical classification of 3 or 4 was similar between the 2 groups (82.6% versus 86.7%, P = .173). Diabetes was more frequent in the RYGB group (43.2% versus 55.6%, P = .004). 30-day mortality (0.6% versus 0.6%, OR 1.1, 95% CI .11-9.49), serious morbidity (5.2% versus 5.6%, OR .91, 95% CI .42-0.96), and overall morbidity (9% versus 9.1%, OR 1.0, 95% CI .55-1.81) were similar. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery, SG is not associated with significantly different 30-day outcomes compared to RYGB. Both procedures are followed by acceptably low morbidity and mortality.
Authors: Anthony B Mozer; John R Pender; William H H Chapman; Megan E Sippey; Walter J Pories; Konstantinos Spaniolas Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Andrea Balla; Gabriela Batista Rodríguez; Santiago Corradetti; Carmen Balagué; Sonia Fernández-Ananín; Eduard M Targarona Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2017-08-05 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Anthony B Mozer; Konstantinos Spaniolas; Megan E Sippey; Adam Celio; Mark L Manwaring; Kevin R Kasten Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Kevin R Kasten; Adam C Celio; Lauren Trakimas; Mark L Manwaring; Konstantinos Spaniolas Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Khodayar Goshtasbi; Mehdi Abouzari; Sina Soltanzadeh-Zarandi; Brooke Sarna; Ariel Lee; Frank P K Hsu; Hamid R Djalilian Journal: Clin Neurol Neurosurg Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 1.876
Authors: Rena C Moon; Flavio Kreimer; Andre F Teixeira; Josemberg M Campos; Alvaro Ferraz; Muhammad A Jawad Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 4.129