Literature DB >> 25701247

Identifying promising practices for evaluation: the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Amy DeGroff1, Karen Cheung, Nicola Dawkins-Lyn, Mary Ann Hall, Stephanie Melillo, Rebecca Glover-Kudon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted a systematic screening and assessment process to identify promising practices implemented by grantees of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program and its partners that were appropriate for rigorous evaluation.
METHODS: The systematic screening and assessment (SSA) process was conducted from September 2010 through March 2012 and included five steps: (1) nominations of promising practices; (2) a first rating by subject matter experts; (3) field-based evaluability assessments; (4) a second rating by experts; and (5) use of results. Nominations were sought in three program areas including health education and promotion, quality assurance and quality improvement, and case management/patient navigation.
RESULTS: A total of 98 practices were nominated of which 54 % were eligible for the first review by the experts. Fifteen practices were selected for evaluability assessment with ten forwarded for the second review by the experts. Three practices were ultimately recommended for rigorous evaluation, and one evaluation was conducted. Most nominated practices were based on evidence-based strategies rather than representing new, innovative activities. Issues were identified through the process including inconsistent implementation and lack of implementation fidelity.
CONCLUSION: While the SSA was successful in identifying several programs for evaluation, the process also revealed important shortcomings in program implementation. Training and technical assistance could help address these issues and support improved programming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25701247      PMCID: PMC4618325          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-015-0538-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  10 in total

1.  Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Edward Lichtenstein; Alfred C Marcus
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Public health asks of systems science: to advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence?

Authors:  Lawrence W Green
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  External validity: we need to do more.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Lawrence W Green; Lisa M Klesges; David B Abrams; Edwin B Fisher; Michael G Goldstein; Laura L Hayman; Judith K Ockene; C Tracy Orleans
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2006-04

Review 4.  Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation.

Authors:  Joseph A Durlak; Emily P DuPre
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2008-06

5.  A framework for public health action: the health impact pyramid.

Authors:  Thomas R Frieden
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The Colorectal Cancer Control Program: partnering to increase population level screening.

Authors:  Djenaba A Joseph; Amy S DeGroff; Nikki S Hayes; Faye L Wong; Marcus Plescia
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Using data to effectively manage a national screening program.

Authors:  Brandie Yancy; Janet E Royalty; Steve Marroulis; Cindy Mattingly; Vicki B Benard; Amy DeGroff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program in the era of health reform: a vision forward.

Authors:  Marcus Plescia; Faye Wong; Jennifer Pieters; Djenaba Joseph
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  When performance management works: a study of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Amy DeGroff; Janet E Royalty; Will Howe; Dennis W Buckman; James Gardner; Theodore Poister; Nikki Hayes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Seeking best practices: a conceptual framework for planning and improving evidence-based practices.

Authors:  Lorine M Spencer; Michael W Schooley; Lynda A Anderson; Chris S Kochtitzky; Amy S DeGroff; Heather M Devlin; Shawna L Mercer
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.830

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Preventing premature deaths from breast and cervical cancer among underserved women in the United States: insights gained from a national cancer screening program.

Authors:  Mary C White; Faye L Wong
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Forward. The reach and health impacts of the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program.

Authors:  Gery P Guy; Florence K L Tangka; Ingrid J Hall; Jacqueline W Miller; Janet Royalty
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Using Evidence-Based Interventions to Improve Cancer Screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Amy DeGroff; Aundrea Carter; Kristy Kenney; Zachary Myles; Stephanie Melillo; Janet Royalty; Ketra Rice; Lindsay Gressard; Jacqueline W Miller
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct

Review 4.  Cancer Prevention: Obstacles, Challenges and the Road Ahead.

Authors:  Frank L Meyskens; Hasan Mukhtar; Cheryl L Rock; Jack Cuzick; Thomas W Kensler; Chung S Yang; Scott D Ramsey; Scott M Lippman; David S Alberts
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  A nationally quasi-experimental study to assess the impact of partial organized breast and cervical cancer screening programme on participation and inequalities.

Authors:  Heling Bao; Limin Wang; Matthew Brown; Mei Zhang; Katherine Hunt; Jiangli Di; Zhenping Zhao; Shu Cong; Jing Fan; Liwen Fang; Linhong Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.