Literature DB >> 25700701

Effects of method of administration on oral health-related quality of life assessment using the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ-G11-14).

Sandra Malter1, Christian Hirsch1, Daniel R Reissmann2,3, Oliver Schierz4, Katrin Bekes5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Questionnaires that measure oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in children and adolescents have emerged in recent years as an important source of patient-reported outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate potential effects of the method of administration (face-to-face interview, telephone interview, or self-administered questionnaire) in 11- to 14-year-old children and adolescents on OHRQoL information obtained using the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: OHRQoL was measured using the German version of the CPQ (CPQ-G11-14). The instrument was administered to 42 children and adolescents aged 11 to 14 years using the three different methods in a randomized order with an interval of 1 week between each administration. Test-retest reliability for the repeated CPQ-G11-14 assessments across the three methods of administration, internal consistency, and convergent validity were determined.
RESULTS: The CPQ-G11-14 mean summary scores did not vary statistically significantly across the three administration methods (P = 0.274). Test-retest reliability was moderate to good (ICC 0.69-0.82), internal consistency was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha 0.85-0.88), and CPQ-G11-14 mean summary scores were correlated in the expected direction with a global measure of self-reported oral health for all the three administration methods.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the method of administration (face-to-face interview, telephone interview, or self-administered questionnaire) did not influence CPQ-G11-14 scores in 11- to 14-year-old children and adolescents to a significant extent. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Investigators in German-speaking countries can choose between all three methods of administration to obtain valid and reliable OHRQoL information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Administration methods; Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ); Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL)

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25700701     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1434-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  19 in total

1.  Health status assessments using the Veterans SF-12 and SF-36: methods for evaluating otucomes in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  D Jones; L Kazis; A Lee; W Rogers; K Skinner; L Cassar; N Wilson; A Hendricks
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2001-07

Review 2.  Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria.

Authors:  Neil Aaronson; Jordi Alonso; Audrey Burnam; Kathleen N Lohr; Donald L Patrick; Edward Perrin; Ruth E Stein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments.

Authors:  Robert G Marx; Alia Menezes; Lois Horovitz; Edward C Jones; Russell F Warren
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  A comparison of costs and data quality of three health survey methods: mail, telephone and personal home interview.

Authors:  B I O'Toole; D Battistutta; A Long; K Crouch
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.

Authors:  C A McHorney; M Kosinski; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Level of agreement between self-administered and interviewer-administered CPQ₈₋₁₀ and CPQ₁₋₁₄.

Authors:  Maria Letícia Ramos-Jorge; Raquel G Vieira-Andrade; Paulo A Martins-Júnior; Mabel M R Cordeiro; Joana Ramos-Jorge; Saul Martins Paiva; Leandro S Marques
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.383

8.  SF-36 scores vary by method of administration: implications for study design.

Authors:  R A Lyons; K Wareham; M Lucas; D Price; J Williams; H A Hutchings
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1999-03

9.  A comparison of OHIP 14 and OIDP as interviews and questionnaires.

Authors:  P G Robinson; B Gibson; F A Khan; W Birnbaum
Journal:  Community Dent Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.349

10.  Changes in parent-assessed oral health-related quality of life among young children following dental treatment under general anaesthetic.

Authors:  P E Malden; W M Thomson; A Jokovic; D Locker
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.383

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation in spanish of the malocclusion impact questionnaire (MIQ).

Authors:  Bárbara Hope; Carlos Zaror; Paulo Sandoval; Mario Garay; David L Streiner
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.186

2.  Effect of method of administration on the oral health-related quality of life assessment using the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS-G).

Authors:  Katrin Bekes; Cia Solanke; Tessa Waldhart; Julia Priller; Tanja Stamm
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.573

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.