Literature DB >> 25699039

On the dark side of therapies with immunoglobulin concentrates: the adverse events.

Peter J Späth1, Guido Granata2, Fabiola La Marra2, Taco W Kuijpers3, Isabella Quinti2.   

Abstract

Therapy by human immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrates is a success story ongoing for decades with an ever increasing demand for this plasma product. The success of IgG concentrates on a clinical level is documented by the slowly increasing number of registered indication and the more rapid increase of the off-label uses, a topic dealt with in another contribution to this special issue of Frontiers in Immunology. A part of the success is the adverse event (AE) profile of IgG concentrates which is, even at life-long need for therapy, excellent. Transmission of pathogens in the last decade could be entirely controlled through the antecedent introduction by authorities of a regulatory network and installing quality standards by the plasma fractionation industry. The cornerstone of the regulatory network is current good manufacturing practice. Non-infectious AEs occur rarely and mainly are mild to moderate. However, in recent times, the increase in frequency of hemolytic and thrombotic AEs raised worrying questions on the possible background for these AEs. Below, we review elements of non-infectious AEs, and particularly focus on hemolysis and thrombosis. We discuss how the introduction of plasma fractionation by ion-exchange chromatography and polishing by immunoaffinity chromatographic steps might alter repertoire of specificities and influence AE profiles and efficacy of IgG concentrates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVIG; SCIG; adverse events; complement; cytokines; hemolysis; thrombosis

Year:  2015        PMID: 25699039      PMCID: PMC4318428          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


Introduction – The Tinge of the Dark Side of Therapies with Immunoglobulin Concentrates

Since the initial clinical use of immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrates of human origin, transmission of pathogens and non-infectious adverse events (AEs) were reported (1–7). Before the mid 90s, transmission of pathogens depended on the pool size and the fractionation methods used, particularly the polishing steps of an IgG concentrate (8). Mode of fractionation, i.e., cold-ethanol or ion-exchange chromatography, contaminants, route of application, i.e., intra muscular (IMIG), intravenous (IVIG), or subcutaneous (SCIG), the rate of increase of the exogenous IgG in the circulation of the recipient over time and, last but not least an eventually existing risk factor from patients’ side (Figure 1) as well as incorrect handling of the concentrate are factors having a role in inducing non-infectious AEs related to administration of IgG concentrates (Table 1). IgG concentrates represent a defined part of the adaptive immune system, are isolated from pooled human plasma of at least 1000 donors, which contribute to the repertoire diversity in the final product. Therapies with IgG concentrates manufactured according to regulators requirements are acknowledged to be safe in general. This does not exclude the occurrence of AEs which in their majority are rare and clinically mild to moderate. Below, we like to give a few insights into various aspects and possible mechanisms of AEs.
Figure 1

Provoking the dark. AEs to therapeutic IgG concentrates might be evoked by several factors. These are listed in the introductory part and Table 1. Contemplating on the active ingredient of the concentrates, the administration of the IgG molecules inevitably results in the interactions of the exogenous IgG with the various parts of the immune system of the recipient and vice versa. This interaction in its principle generates an inflammatory condition. A key parameter deciding on the intensity of such a condition is the rate of increase over time of exogenous IgG in the circulation of the recipient. Insert to figure (shadowed): ΔIgG in the circulation over Δtime is dependent on the combination of infusion rate (IR) and the strength of the solution applied. Main figure: the mode of application, i.e., intravenous or subcutaneous, are additional factors being decisive for kinetics and the area under the curve of generation of pro-inflammatory mediators and for passing the individual threshold (short-dashed line) for a clinically noticeable AE. The threshold in turn depends on eventually exiting risk factors form the patient side. Although the area under the curve might be the same for low (long-dashed line) and high (solid line) IRs, at high IR, the system might not be able to cope with the extent of reactions. At low IR (long-dashed line), all the events might remain below the threshold of clinically observable AE. Subcutaneously applied IgG concentrate reaches the circulation slowly and systemic AEs are less frequent than with IVIG. In contrast, local mild to moderate AEs are more frequent with SCIG.

Table 1

The tinge of the dark.

Symptoms and signsFrequencyIRR or total dosePRRSystemClass, severity, and durationPart of the product likely being involved in AEs
FatigueCommon (SCIG as well)NoConstitutional or systemic (generalized)Immediate, mild, transient
MalaiseCommonNoYesConstitutional or systemic (generalized)Immediate, mild, transient
FeverCommonYesYesConstitutional or systemic (generalized)Immediate, mild, transient
FlushingCommonYesYesConstitutional or systemic (generalized)Immediate, mild, transient
ChillsCommonYesYesConstitutional or systemic (generalized)Immediate, mild, transient
AnorexiaCommonNoConstitutional or systemic (generalized)Immediate, mild, transient
MyalgiaCommonYesYesConstitutional or systemic (generalized)Immediate, mild, transient
ArthralgiaCommonYesYesConstitutional or systemic (generalized)Immediate, mild, transient
Joint swellingCommonYesYesConstitutional or systemic (generalized)Mild, transient
“Flu-like” symptomsCommonYesYesConstitutional or systemic (generalized)Immediate, mild, transientIncrease in A (dimers)
Anaphylactoid symptomsRareComplement activationImmune complexes (presence of acute infection)NoYesConstitutional or systemic (generalized)IgA: acute to immediate; other late, severe transientI: IgA, very rare immune complexes
Full blown anaphylaxisRare Complement activation (in the presence of acute infection)NoYesConstitutional or systemic (generalized)Late, severe, hopefully transient (ICU)I: IgA, very rare immune complexes
HeadacheCommonYesYesNeurologicImmediate, mild, transientIncrease in A
MigraineCommonYesYesNeurologicTransientIncrease in A
DizzinessCommonYesYesNeurologicTransientIncrease in A
Aseptic meningitisRareNoNoNeurologicDelayed, moderate, transientIncrease in A
Diffuse pain, muscle painRareYesYesNeurologicTransientIncrease in A
DysesthesiaRareContributesNeurologicIncrease in A
WeaknessRareContributesNeurologicIncrease in A
Persistent headacheRareYesNeurologicDelayed, moderateIncrease in A
Shortness of breathCommonDoseYesRespiratory
BronchospasmCommonYesYesRespiratory
Pleural effusionRareDoseContributesRespiratorySevere, transient
TRALIRareDoseLikelyRespiratoryLate, severe, transient (ICU)
HypotensionCommonYesYesCardiovascularImmediate, mild, transient
HypertensionCommonYesContributesCardiovascularImmediate, mild, transient
TachycardiaCommonYesYesCardiovascularImmediate, mild, transient
Chest/back painCommonYesYesCardiovascularImmediate, mild, transient
ArrhythmiaRareDoseContributesCardiovascularSevere, hopefully transient
Myocardial infarctionRareDoseContributesCardiovascularSevere to fatalIncrease in A
AnorexiaCommonGastrointestinal
NauseaCommonYesYesGastrointestinalImmediate, mild, transient
VomitingCommonYesYesGastrointestinalImmediate, mild, transient
CrampingCommonYesContributesGastrointestinal
DiarrheaCommonContributesGastrointestinal
ColitisRareContributesGastrointestinalLate, severe
Tubular swellingRareDoseContributesRenalSevere, reversible; scars might remainE: sucrose > > other sugars
Renal failureRareContributesRenalDelayed. severe, ICUIncrease in A (Complement deposition)
Infusion site pain, swelling, erythemaCommon (SCIG more frequent)CutaneousImmediate, mild, transientSCIG: volume
UrticariaCommonYesCutaneousIncrease in A
Non-specific macular or maculopapular eruptions/eczemaCommonYesCutaneousIncrease in A
PruritusCommonContributesCutaneous
Erythema multiformeRareContributesCutaneousIncrease in A
Cutaneous vasculitisRareDoseContributesCutaneousDelayed, severe
Hemolysis (clinically not significant)CommonYesContributesHematologicDelayed, moderate, transient
Acute hemolysis/hemolytic anemiaRareYesYesHematologicDelayed, severeIncrease in A
Thrombotic phenomena (DVT, stroke, cardial infarction)RareYesYesHematologicSevere, ICUIncrease in A
HyperviscosityRareYesContributesHematologicImmediateIncrease in A
NeutropeniaRareYesHematologicDelayed, mild, transientIncrease in A
Blood borne infectious diseaseRareNoNoMicrobiologicalLate, severeI: blood borne viruses, spongiform encephalopathy agent
Inappropriate handling before infusionNoImmediate, mild to severeA: incomplete dissolution of lyophilized product; denaturation and aggregate formation due to foam
E: lyophilized product dissolved to result in too high concentrations; lyophilized product dissolved to result in too high osmolality; low temperature of concentrate at the time of infusion

The various manifestations of AEs in recipients of polyvalent immunoglobulins. Frequency, severity, duration, timing, possible causes, risk factors.

A, active ingredient = IgG; I, impurities; E, excipients/stabilizers; “immediate”, immediate reaction – within 6 h from the onset of infusion; “delayed”, delayed reaction – 6 h to 1 week after infusion; “late”, late reaction: weeks to months after infusion; IRR, infusion rate-related; PRR, patient-related risk factors (acute infection at the time of infusion); ICU, intensive care unit; SCIG, IgG concentrate for subcutaneous application.

Provoking the dark. AEs to therapeutic IgG concentrates might be evoked by several factors. These are listed in the introductory part and Table 1. Contemplating on the active ingredient of the concentrates, the administration of the IgG molecules inevitably results in the interactions of the exogenous IgG with the various parts of the immune system of the recipient and vice versa. This interaction in its principle generates an inflammatory condition. A key parameter deciding on the intensity of such a condition is the rate of increase over time of exogenous IgG in the circulation of the recipient. Insert to figure (shadowed): ΔIgG in the circulation over Δtime is dependent on the combination of infusion rate (IR) and the strength of the solution applied. Main figure: the mode of application, i.e., intravenous or subcutaneous, are additional factors being decisive for kinetics and the area under the curve of generation of pro-inflammatory mediators and for passing the individual threshold (short-dashed line) for a clinically noticeable AE. The threshold in turn depends on eventually exiting risk factors form the patient side. Although the area under the curve might be the same for low (long-dashed line) and high (solid line) IRs, at high IR, the system might not be able to cope with the extent of reactions. At low IR (long-dashed line), all the events might remain below the threshold of clinically observable AE. Subcutaneously applied IgG concentrate reaches the circulation slowly and systemic AEs are less frequent than with IVIG. In contrast, local mild to moderate AEs are more frequent with SCIG. The tinge of the dark. The various manifestations of AEs in recipients of polyvalent immunoglobulins. Frequency, severity, duration, timing, possible causes, risk factors. A, active ingredient = IgG; I, impurities; E, excipients/stabilizers; “immediate”, immediate reaction – within 6 h from the onset of infusion; “delayed”, delayed reaction – 6 h to 1 week after infusion; “late”, late reaction: weeks to months after infusion; IRR, infusion rate-related; PRR, patient-related risk factors (acute infection at the time of infusion); ICU, intensive care unit; SCIG, IgG concentrate for subcutaneous application.

Pathogen Safety of IgG Concentrates – How to Exclude the Menaces from a Dark and Frightening Environment

Manufacturing of modern IgG concentrates has to occur in a regulatory framework and the quality standards implemented by the plasma fractionating industry (Figure 2). The cornerstone of the regulatory framework is current good manufacturing practice (cGMP). A pillar of pathogen safety is the validation of virus inactivation and virus elimination methods by validating an already performed step of the fractionation process or by introduction of dedicated steps (Figure 3). A hallmark of virus elimination introduced in the late 90s in Berne by the team of Christoph Kempf is the large-scale virus filtration technique (formerly also termed “nanofiltration”) (8). Meanwhile, virus filtration became a versatile tool to eliminate a variety of pathogens, the suspected agent of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease included. Thanks to the tightly implemented regulatory framework, pathogen safety of plasma products is at a level never reached before. This is well supported by the fact of reports missing in the last decade of transmission by IgG concentrates of emerging viruses (SARS coronavirus, West Nile Virus, MERS coronavirus, and others), zoonotic pathogens, or the agent of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD). Furthermore, the development of specific mass screening techniques might help to eradicate in any blood product the transmission of vCJD in the future (9).
Figure 2

Staying within a regulatory network is mandatory for remaining at the sunny side of the moon. Handling of blood/plasma products to obtain therapeutic goods has to be performed within a regulatory framework. Manufacturing of stable blood product has to adhere strictly to current good manufacturing practice (cGMP). Application of cGMP starts from the moment of collecting whole blood and isolation of plasma thereof (R = recovered plasma) or the machine-supported collection of plasma (S = source plasma, apheresis plasma). Application of cGMP ends at delivery of blood/plasma products to health care professionals. Not following cGMP can lead to withdrawal of a plasma product from the market from one to the other day.

Figure 3

Active measures in fractionation to stay on the sunny side of the moon. (*) depicts possible sites for validating the efficiency of already established fractionation steps or for introducing dedicated pathogen reduction and/or inactivation measures. Histo-blood group antibodies were made responsible for hemolytic AEs. Reduction of these during the manufacturing process is possible by introduction of an immunoaffinity chromatographic step in order to reduce anti-A and anti-B titers.

Staying within a regulatory network is mandatory for remaining at the sunny side of the moon. Handling of blood/plasma products to obtain therapeutic goods has to be performed within a regulatory framework. Manufacturing of stable blood product has to adhere strictly to current good manufacturing practice (cGMP). Application of cGMP starts from the moment of collecting whole blood and isolation of plasma thereof (R = recovered plasma) or the machine-supported collection of plasma (S = source plasma, apheresis plasma). Application of cGMP ends at delivery of blood/plasma products to health care professionals. Not following cGMP can lead to withdrawal of a plasma product from the market from one to the other day. Active measures in fractionation to stay on the sunny side of the moon. (*) depicts possible sites for validating the efficiency of already established fractionation steps or for introducing dedicated pathogen reduction and/or inactivation measures. Histo-blood group antibodies were made responsible for hemolytic AEs. Reduction of these during the manufacturing process is possible by introduction of an immunoaffinity chromatographic step in order to reduce anti-A and anti-B titers.

How the Shadow Might Grow – Some Basic Insights into Possible Mechanisms of Non-Infectious Adverse Events

The human immune system is in charge of controlling invading organisms and mediates homeostasis. The immunoglobulin pools in mammals (IgM, IgG, and IgA) to its smaller part provide defense and to the larger part homeostasis. Human IgG has a role in both. Efficient host defense is supported by “immune antibodies.” These have undergone somatic hypermutations and have in their vast majority narrow specificities and high affinities. Antibodies, generated in absence of external stimuli are termed “natural antibodies” (NAbs). They occasionally recognize self structures. In general, the V(D)J genes of NAbs are in germ-line configuration or have undergone a few somatic hypermutations only. Furthermore, they have broad specificity, are of low affinity (with exceptions) and high avidity (10). These NAbs can participate in primary host defense, i.e., at a time point when an immunologic reaction has not provided the specific antibodies, react, e.g., with repetitive structures which can be found on bacteria or viruses (11). The self-reactive NAbs, which we like to term physiologic autoantibodies, comprises various populations of antibodies such as (i) those able to interact through their complementary variable regions (V-regions) with the V-regions of circulating and membrane-bound (BCR) immunoglobulins and the T cell receptor (TCR) β-chain variable region, providing a peripheral immune network (V-connected network) (10); (ii) the NAbs reacting in a non-idiotypic manner with the hinge region of immunoglobulins (12, 13); (iii) populations of NAbs showing a wide variety of specificities toward growth factors, cytokines, or anaphylatoxin (10); (iii) and the population reacting with the soluble or membrane-bound forms of cell surface molecules having immunological importance, the last described being the Fc receptors CD16 and CD32 (14). Antibodies reacting with docking structures for viruses or bacteria can have additional first-line defense potential (15). These populations of NAbs were described having a peripheral immune network homeostatic and anti-inflammatory function (16, 17). Although the primordial humoral proteins comprising the complement and lectin-like proteins in the plasma play a definite role, another population of self-reactive NAbs reacting with, e.g., epitopes conserved over the evolution apparently has tissue homeostatic function and might support the efficient removal of roughly 1012 altered/senescent cells of the body per day (for references see below). The signal for research on NAbs in IVIG was the description of IgG autoantibody-mediated immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) being corrected by infusion of a polyclonal, polyspecific IgG concentrate (18, 19). This research has expanded ever since. The populations of immune antibodies and NAbs in IgG concentrates upon infusion/injection inevitably react with occasional pathogens, toxins, or superantigens and concomitantly infusion/injection also results in recognition of a wide array of tissue antigens and V-regions of the recipient’s immune system. Reactions with tissue antigens and V-regions are conveyed by the self-reactive antibodies of the many donors in the IgG concentrate. Vice versa, the recipient’s immune system reacts with the infused IgG. A bewildering wide range of possible reactions can occur which primarily are dependent on the immune status of the recipient at the time of therapy and to a smaller part on the IgG concentrate(s). The therapeutic effect achieved depends on the disease treated, and can depend on the concentration reached locally, i.e., can have agonistic or antagonistic effects (17, 20–22). In summary, it is our opinion that IgG concentrates always provide more or less the same “bouquet” of IgG specificities (similarity); however, it is the recipient’s actual immune condition which decides from which IgG specificities the patient’s derailed immune system is profiting (diversity). Parameters of IgG-mediated AEs are: (i) the content in the product of biologically highly active likely beneficial ingredients that have to be kept under control (e.g., content of “dimers” devoid of remarkable complement activation in vivo; see below), and the content in unwanted active ingredients that have to be discarded during manufacturing (alloantibodies); (ii) impurities such as IgA (anaphylactoid reaction); (iii) activated coagulation and contact activation factors (thromboembolic events) and; (iv) excipients such as sucrose (osmotic nephrosis). Below, we like to add and contemplate on how fully native IgG molecules not harmed by the manufacturing process might add to AEs. The above mentioned inevitable interaction of the exogenous IgG with the immune system of the recipient and vice versa in its principle might evoke an inflammatory condition. The sum of the potentially beneficial reactions might overshoot and lead to AEs (Figure 1). The principle of induction of mild inflammatory conditions upon each infusion of a well-tolerated IVIG was confirmed when several dozen normogammaglobulinemic volunteers in all cases except one, showed a more or less moderate inflammatory reaction as indicated by the increase of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) at 2.5 h post initiation of infusion. The only person in the cohort not showing a measurable TNFα increase was a woman caring at home for her brother with full blown AIDS (22). Subcutaneously applied IgG concentrate reaches the circulation slowly and systemic AEs are less frequent compared to IVIG but they are not absent (23–28) (a case of unintentional i.v. application of SCIG is not considered). In contrast, local mild to moderate AEs are more frequent with SCIG (29). In summary, the intensity of the resulting AEs is depending on the immune status of the recipient, the infusion rate (IR), e.g., how rapidly the active ingredients (the various IgG specificities), the impurities, and the excipients reach the circulation of the recipient. Thus, the i.v. application has the highest chance for the occurrence of AEs. In the early days of IVIG therapy, complement-mediated “anaphylactoid” (i.e., immediate) and “phlogistic” (i.e., inflammatory) AEs were distinguished (30, 31). The complement-mediated AEs were considered to be caused by aggregates in the product (“spontaneous complement activation” or anti-complementary activity or ACA) or by in vivo formation of immune complexes (ICs, patient’s condition related; e.g., subclinical infections or the unnoticed presence of anti-IgA antibodies) and therefore only IgG concentrates with low or absent ACA is accepted by authorities for human use. Below, we present one instructive case of each type of reaction.

Immediate adverse events – the rapid onset of darkness

The first reports of rapid onset AEs concerned either the application of complement-activating fractions in an IgG concentrate or the in vivo formation of complement-activating ICs (2–4). A very rare but potentially fatal condition is the formation of IgA/anti-IgA complexes in patients being initiated on replacement therapy and having serum IgG antibodies against infused IgA not recognized before the start of the IVIG infusion (32). Prerequisite for the presence of anti-IgA antibodies is the most common primary immunoglobulin defect, i.e., selective IgA deficiency (sIgAD) or IgAD associated with diminution of other immunoglobulin classes. IgAD is defined by serum levels of <0.05 or <0.07 g/L (depending on laboratories). A marked diminution of serum IgA consistent with IgAD in various ethnic groups is estimated being 1:155 to 1:18,550 (33). The mean frequency in Caucasians is approximately 1:700 (34). Up to 40% of patients with IgAD have been reported having anti-IgA antibodies in the serum with titers ranging between 1:4 and 1:262,144. In approximately 10% of patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), and occasionally in patients with other primary immunodeficiency diseases, measurable anti-IgA can be detected (35, 36). These antibodies are predominantly of the IgG class, but anti-IgA antibodies of other immunoglobulin classes have been described as well (37, 38). The reason for their emergence remains unknown. Taken the above numbers, the infusion of human-derived products containing IgA resulting in severe anaphylactoid type AEs should be considerable. This is not the case (39). Questions about the clinical relevance of above numbers emerge as soon as blood banks (i) estimate the theoretical risk of IgA anaphylactic reactions (32); (ii) assess the relation of severe IgAD with the presence or absence of anti-IgA antibodies (40); (iii) screen donors for very low IgA levels in order to become able to provide blood and plasma-derived products free of IgA and find a considerably lower frequency than expected (41). Alternatively, the test systems may not reliably detect anti-IgA antibodies being as yet insensitive and inaccurate or – at least – do not correspond to the clinically relevant fraction of antibodies. This comes to mind when a more close look to “anti-IgA” gives “unexpected” results, including “anti-IgA” in blood donors with normal serum IgA level or “anti-IgA” that cannot be neutralized with purified IgA (42); or when blood products containing proven anti-IgA do not elicit severe AEs (43). Among patients on replacement therapy, those with CVID may rarely develop severe immediate AEs (32). The discrepancy between anti-IgA positive patients and frequency of AEs raises the question about the nature of the many reported anti-IgA antibodies and also raises the question about the immunologic condition which allows the formation of anaphylactoid anti-IgA antibodies. There might be some logic in supposing that anaphylactoid anti-IgA cannot evolve at IgA levels otherwise fulfilling the definition of IgAD. Such a condition would constantly generate ICs which in turn could activate complement, react with immune cells, and be deposited in lung and kidney. Indeed, Horn et al. found anti-IgA antibodies in CVID patients missing IgA+ B cells and presenting with IgA levels <0.0009 g/L, a level which is more than 50- to 70-fold lower than the threshold for IgAD (44). However, a possibility for an IgA-mediated anaphylactoid reaction at measurable IgA serum levels might exist. Serum IgA contains approximately 85% subclass 1 of IgA (IgA1) and only 15% subclass 2 of IgA (IgA2). Selective deficiency of IgA2 and – although evidence is lacking – the presence of a highly specific anti-IgA2 antibody theoretically could elicit a severe AE. The kinetics of anti-IgA after infusion of blood products have been studied in a few cases. In these patients, a fall in anti-IgA titers has been noticed followed by an increase during subsequent weeks or months. This suggests that at appropriate proportions, IgA of the infused material and anti-IgA present in the patients’ serum combine with each other to form ICs. In turn, ICs activate complement that are bound and eliminated by macrophages most likely leading to cytokine release. The increase in anti-IgA titers over time indicates that the infused IgA-containing product has a booster effect (36, 37, 45). Such boosting effect together with the presence of anti-IgA before the application of an IgG concentrate can be taken as the ultimate confirmation of a supposed IgA/anti-IgA reaction. Figure 4 depicts a well-documented case of IgA/anti-IgA reaction in a patient who progressed from sIgAD to CVID. The events during the first 12 h at occasion of the first infusion of IVIG were as follows (shadowed area in Figure 4): 2 min after the start of the infusion, having received eight drops of an IgG solution (IgA < 1.2 g/L; 3% solution), she experienced a flush, back pain, rigors, difficulty in breathing, and hypotension. The infusion was immediately stopped. After approximately 1 h, the reaction has weaned, and 2 h later the patient felt well again, and the infusion of total 6 g IgG could be continued without further complications. Although the patient fairly assured having never received any blood or plasma product in the past, the follow-up of her anti-IgA titers from before infusion to 1 year later confirmed a true anaphylactoid reaction mediated by anti-IgA, as the anti-IgA became undetectable immediately after the infusion and showed a boosting phenomenon during the following months. True anaphylactoid reaction was further confirmed by follow-up of total complement hemolytic activity (CH50) on the day of infusion. Interestingly enough, the CH50 value reached its nadir at the end of the infusion when the patient had no complains. Although a single case only, the events during the first infusion call for the following remarks: (i) severe AEs most likely occur at concomitant complement and cell activation with cytokine release; (ii) infusion of minute to low amounts of IVIG hours before the main infusion can “anergize” cells and stop release of pro-inflammatory cytokines; (iii) “anergized” cells loose reactivity toward ongoing formation of ICs and complement activation products.
Figure 4

An individual’s slithering into the dark. A female patient has been suffering from recurrent airway infections since adolescence, occasionally complicated by pneumonia. At age 34, selective IgA deficiency was diagnosed. Ten years later, she was hospitalized with pneumonia. Within these 10 years, her serum IgG had dropped from 7 to 0.87 g/L (long-dashed line) and IgA was undetectable. The diagnosis was corrected into CVID, and IVIG replacement therapy was initiated (shadowed area). Two minutes after the start of the infusion of a 3% IgG solution (IgA < 1.2 g/L; 3% solution), she experienced a flush, back pain, rigors, difficulty in breathing, and hypotension. The infusion was immediately stopped and later continued without further complications (see text). The confirmation of a true anaphylactoid reaction due to anti-IgA in the serum of the patient was achieved by follow-up of anti-IgA (solid line) and CH50 (short-dashed line).

An individual’s slithering into the dark. A female patient has been suffering from recurrent airway infections since adolescence, occasionally complicated by pneumonia. At age 34, selective IgA deficiency was diagnosed. Ten years later, she was hospitalized with pneumonia. Within these 10 years, her serum IgG had dropped from 7 to 0.87 g/L (long-dashed line) and IgA was undetectable. The diagnosis was corrected into CVID, and IVIG replacement therapy was initiated (shadowed area). Two minutes after the start of the infusion of a 3% IgG solution (IgA < 1.2 g/L; 3% solution), she experienced a flush, back pain, rigors, difficulty in breathing, and hypotension. The infusion was immediately stopped and later continued without further complications (see text). The confirmation of a true anaphylactoid reaction due to anti-IgA in the serum of the patient was achieved by follow-up of anti-IgA (solid line) and CH50 (short-dashed line). A non-complement-mediated anaphylactoid reaction was ascribed to the unforeseen release of elastase and other pro-inflammatory substances from neutrophils activated by the formation of in vivo IgA/anti-IgA complexes. Complement activation or mast cell-dependent release of vasoactive substances was excluded as pathogenic mechanisms. Although the IgA/anti-IgA complexes usually do not cause clinically relevant neutrophil degranulation within the circulation, the presence of a rare genotype encoding a novel gain-of-function IgG receptor on neutrophils may provoke premature degranulation by these complexes. This phenomenon was only relevant in hypogammaglobulinemic patients in the presence of in vivo IgA/anti-IgA complexes (46). The low prevalence of this genotype combined with an IgAD or CVID may add how to explain the rarity of serious anaphylactoid reactions in newly IVIG-treated patients. Authors share the opinion of Janne Björkander who at occasion of a discussion panel “Dilemmas in Diagnosis and Management of Antibody Deficiencies: Ask the Experts” held at occasion of the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI), New York City, March 1–6, 2002 came to the following conclusion: a clinician has to be aware of the risk, particularly at occasion of first infusions, but otherwise IgA is not a major concern (from tape record).

Pro-inflammatory cytokines – the phlogiston of the dark

In the early days of Ig-therapy, the nature of the “phlogistic” AEs was obscure. However, it was already known that an AE can be prevented or its evolution halted when the patient receives a low dose of IVIG first or the infusion is stopped early and is continued several hours later. Hours later the infusion can be (re)started at high rates without further problems (Figure 5). One of the authors had a particular opportunity to get an insight into what a “phlogistic reaction” might be. At the occasion of a voluntary infusion of an investigational liquid IVIG, he encountered a severe flu-like AE of more than 12 h duration. Before injection, the investigational liquid preparation had passed all release criteria for human use, including spontaneous complement activation assessed by ACA and was free of prekallikrein activator (PKA). In those days, assays for cytokines in biological samples just began to become available and were included into the parameters assessed in the study. Infusion was stopped after 1 h because of a drop of pulse rate and heavy discomfort provoking the laconic comment by the proband’s technician who was taking samples: “you look green.” The infusion was continued after another 90 min when the heart rate had almost normalized. The infusion could be completed within an additional 3.25 h (a total of 0.4 g/kg b.w.) without further aggravation of malaise. The leukocyte count transiently had dropped to a nadir of 40% at 2 h followed by a leukocytosis peak at 8 h. Complement activation, as assessed by generation of C3a/C3a[desArg] and the formation of the terminal complement complex C5b-9, apparently did not occur: the C3a/C3a[desArg] value reached a maximum of 260 ng/mL (norm: <200 ng/mL) at 7 h while the C5b-9 value never moved outside the normal range. Instead, a sequence of rapid transient massive increases of pro-inflammatory cytokines was observed: (i) TNFα started to increase 30 min post initiation of infusion from a value of 20 pg/mL to a peak value at 2 h which was above the calibration range of the test kit of 1500 pg/mL; (ii) interleukin 8 (IL-8) increase started after 1 h from 29 pg/mL and peaked at 2.5 h with 4400 pg/mL post initiation of infusion; (iii) interleukin 6 (IL-6) secretion started after 1 h with an undetectable level and peaked at 4 h with 345 pg/mL. All pro-inflammatory cytokines fell sharply while the second part of the infusion was still ongoing. The day after infusion, the pro-inflammatory cytokine profiles were back to normal and the flu-like syndrome was gone. In contrast, interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) values started increasing at 1.5 h (300 pg/mL), peaked at 4 h (>32,000 pg/mL), and decreased slowly to reach a value of 10,500 pg/mL 24 h after initiation of the infusion. Soluble TNF receptor p75 level started at 2.25 ng/mL, reached a peak with 16.5 ng/mL at the same time as IL-1ra, and 24 h after initiation of infusion was still at 10.5 ng/mL. Thus, in this normogammaglobulinemic subject similar cytokine profiles and leukocyte number changes were observed as reported for hypogammagobulinemia under replacement therapy (47, 48).
Figure 5

Clinical signs of the “phlogiston” of the dark. A CVID patient received his first infusion of IVIG (a 3% solution). Despite the start of the infusion at an infusion rate [IR, (C)] of only 10 drops per minute and incremental increase by five drops every 30 min, rise of heart rate [HR, (A)], and of body temperature [BT, (B)] after 2 h of the initiation of infusion indicated the onset of a “phlogistic” reaction and infusion was stopped. Stop of the infusion for 30 min immediately let drop HR and BT. Restarting the infusion showed some negative effect and infusion was stopped after application of 9 g IgG [dashed line, (C)]. The next day the rapid infusion of additional 9 g of IgG was without consequence on BT and HR, indicating silencing of cells releasing mediators of inflammation.

Clinical signs of the “phlogiston” of the dark. A CVID patient received his first infusion of IVIG (a 3% solution). Despite the start of the infusion at an infusion rate [IR, (C)] of only 10 drops per minute and incremental increase by five drops every 30 min, rise of heart rate [HR, (A)], and of body temperature [BT, (B)] after 2 h of the initiation of infusion indicated the onset of a “phlogistic” reaction and infusion was stopped. Stop of the infusion for 30 min immediately let drop HR and BT. Restarting the infusion showed some negative effect and infusion was stopped after application of 9 g IgG [dashed line, (C)]. The next day the rapid infusion of additional 9 g of IgG was without consequence on BT and HR, indicating silencing of cells releasing mediators of inflammation. A series of further experiments with investigational and marketed IVIGs was performed. All IgG concentrates were analyzed for their molecular weight (MW) distribution. The most remarkable differences emerged in the MW range of dimers while the presence of minute amounts of higher oligomers could not be excluded with certainty. Below, we will use the term “dimers” for that fraction of IgG with higher MW. Subsequent findings indicated that levels of “dimers” >12% were responsible for complement-independent cell activation and cytokine release. The TNFα peaks assessed at 2.5 h post initiation of infusions correlated with “dimer” content of the IVIGs and mirrored a clinical score of AEs (49–51). A few years before a complement-independent induction of a hypotensive factor by IgG di- and oligomers was reported in animal experiments (52). A key role for macrophages in the generation of the hypotensive lipid factor was identified as platelet-activating factor, being induced by dimers and polymers (53, 54). Several years later, the dimer-mediated AEs in animal experiments were confirmed (55, 56). Yet, at the same time, the dimer content of IVIG apparently correlated with the clinical efficacy in a murine ITP model (55, 57). Variables such as “IR,” “genetic background,” “endogenous immunoglobulin levels,” or “proportional fraction of polymers versus dimers” may impact on the balance between the phlogiston (being cytokines, active lipid substances, or a combination of factors) and the therapeutic efficacy (blocking IgG receptors on liver/spleen macrophages to prevent clearance of “opsonized” material such as platelets in ITP). As of today, reports on release of cytokines in humans in association with AEs or tolerability toward dimers remain scarce and to the best of our knowledge studies in humans of causative factors/fraction in an IgG concentrate has not been adequately addressed (47, 48, 58–61). In IgG preparations, various forms of dimers might be present: formed through covalent binding (62) by denaturation, hydrophobic interactions of the Fc-parts, and by idiotype/anti-idiotype interactions, as part of the V-connected network of peripheral immune homeostasis (63). For a commercially viable fractionation process, pooling of donated plasma is mandatory in order to obtain a volume of starting material large enough to cover ever increasing costs for documentation, in-process, and batch-release testing as it is required by cGMP. Pooling also intends smoothing the batch-to-batch differences in antibody titers, a goal apparently difficult to achieve to levels as theory might imply (64). Consequences of pooling are on the one hand the enrichment of public/common immune antibodies while diluting out individual specificities; on the other hand, the antibodies of the immune network of an individual donor are exposed to those of many other donors. The more individuals contribute to the pool, the more complex the possible “immune-network” interactions among IgA, IgG, and IgM will become. The subsequent fractionation process has far-reaching effects on immunoglobulins from a given pool: only trace amounts of IgA and IgM are retained in the final product, i.e., IgG is deprived of its counterparts of the V-connected immune network. The IgG molecules of the homeostatic network “naked” at their V-regions can interact with each other at random combining site-interactions of single donor-derived monomeric IgG (65), otherwise not existing in vivo. This interaction is largely reversible. With increasing numbers of donors included into the pool, the immune network recognition among the “naked” IgG molecules of the V-connected network becomes more and more complex, and the dimer and lower oligomer content in the resulting IgG concentrate increases (66–68). In lyophilized IgG concentrates, the dimer formation is “frozen” at a low level while in liquid preparations an equilibrium between monomers and dimers is achieved over time reaching a dimer content of 12% or more if not hampered by stabilizers. Specificities, as far as they have been addressed, in the dimer fraction considerably differ from the monomeric fraction (69–73). In conclusion, the immunomodulatory efficacy of IgG concentrates in part depends on the capacity and extent to form “dimer” fractions devoid of remarkable complement activation in vivo. The “art” of manufacturing a liquid IgG concentrate is not to eliminate the monomeric IgG having potential for “dimer” formation but to inhibit extensive “dimerization.” In summary, AEs might be associated with the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines in absence of measurable complement activation in vivo where all regulatory mechanisms and removal processes of a body are at disposition. At reasonable IRs in the open system of the human body, clinically relevant systemic complement activation apparently needs oligomers formed of three or more IgG molecules.

The Missing Oxygen on the Dark Side – Immunoglobulin-Induced Hemolysis

There are multiple reports of Ig-induced hemolytic anemia (HA) in patients receiving high doses of IVIG (60, 74–110) (Table 2; Figure 6; www.adrreports.eu). By spontaneous reporting, risk factors recognized for Ig-induced hemolysis include beside high doses (more than 100 g IVIG over 2–4 days), female gender and histo-blood group type A, B, or AB of recipients.
Table 2

The missing oxygen on the dark side – Ig-induced hemolysis in recipients of polyvalent immunoglobulins.

PublicationNumber of patientsBlood groupMonthly Ig dosage (mg/kg)DATEluted antibodyAlloantibody passively administeredHemoglobin drop (g/L)Outcome
Quinti et al. (110)8A+ (5), A- (1), O+ (2)LowIgG (2), IgG and C3d (4)anti-A (5), anti-C (1), anti-C and anti-D (1)anti-A, anti-C, anti-D6.4, 1.5, 5.1, 1.4, 6.9, 1.1, 1, 1Recovery (7), death (1)
Desbourouh et al. (76)1AB+HighIgG and C3anti-A and anti-Banti-A and anti-B and anti-D6.5Recovery
Mohamed et al. (77)1A+HighIgGanti-And4Recovery
Rink et al. (78)3A+ (2)HighIgGndnd1.2, 3.8, 4.4Recovery
Berard et al. (79)4A+ (2), B+ (1), AB+ (1)HighIgGanti-A (1), anti-B (1), anti-A and anti- B (1)nd2.9, 5.8, 5.8, 3.7Recovery
Michelis et al. (60)1A+HighIgGanti-And3.5Recovery
Pintova et al. (80)2AB+, A+LowIgGanti-And6.6, 7.2Recovery
Morgan et al. (81)3AB+(1), A- (1), A- (1)HighIgGanti-A (2), anti-A and anti-B (1)anti-A (2), anti-A and anti-B (1)4.8, 5.0, 1.8Recovery
Welles et al. (82)1ndHighIgGndnd4.3Death
Canadian Group (83)20A (14), AB (6)HighIgGndnd3.2, 2.8, 5.1, 5, 5.6, 5, 3.5, 4.1, 7, 3.2, 5.6, 3.2, 6.6, 2.9, 3.1, 4, 3.9, 7.8, 4.9, 4.8Recovery (10), death (1), unknown (8)
Gordon et al. (84)4A+ (3), AB+ (1)HighIgGndnd5.3, 5.5, 4.8, 4.8Recovery
Kahwaji et al. (85)16A+ (10), A- (2), B+ (3), AB+ (1)HighIgGndanti-A, anti-B5.3, 4.7, 5.6, 4.9, 5.8, 5.7, 3.3, 2.4, 3.1, 4.0, 3.6, 2.1, 2.2, 2.8, 5.3, 1.9, 2.6, 3.0Recovery
Daw et al. (86)16A+ (7), AB+ (1), AB- (1), B+ (6), O- (1)HighIgGanti-A (6), anti-B (4)anti-A, anti-B1.4, 3.6, 4.3, 3.6, 3.2, 3.4, 3, 4.7, 5.1, 5, 2.4, 8, 5.2, 1.3, 3nd
Yin et al. (87)1AB+HighNegativendanti-A and anti-B and anti-DndRecovery
Coghil et al. (88)1A+HighIgGanti-Aanti-A4Recovery
Chamouni et al. (90)1AB+HighIgGndnd8Recovery
Karaaslan et al. (91)1ndHighIgGndnd3.9Recovery
Trifa et al. (92)1AB+HighIgGanti-A and anti-Banti-A and anti-B7.8Recovery
Nagakawa et al. (94)1A+HighIgGndnd2Recovery
Wilson et al. (95)12A+ (11), O+ (1)High (10), low (2)IgGanti-A (9), anti-A and anti-D (2), anti D (1)nd3.7, 3.8, 1, 1.6, 1.9, 2.9, 1.4, 1.9, 3, 1.8, 1, 0.9nd
Tamada et al. (97)2ndHighIgGanti-A, anti-Bndndnd
Thomas et al. (99)1A+HighIgGanti-Aanti-A6.3Recovery
Comenzo et al. (100)1ndHighndndndndRecovery
Okubo et al. (102)1A+HighIgGanti-Aanti-Andnd
Hillyer et al. (103)1AB+HighIgGanti-A, anti-BndndRecovery
Nicholls et al. (104)2ndHighIgGanti-A, anti-A and anti-Dndndnd
Kim et al. (105)2B+HighIgGanti-Bndndnd
Brox et al. (106)1ndHighIgGanti-Andndnd

Clinical and immunological characteristics of patients described in case reports. Numbers in parenthesis indicate the number of patients with the given condition.

Figure 6

The missing oxygen on the dark side: Ig-induced hemolysis in patients on Ig treatment. Black bars indicate the number of patients with a given clinical condition.

The missing oxygen on the dark side – Ig-induced hemolysis in recipients of polyvalent immunoglobulins. Clinical and immunological characteristics of patients described in case reports. Numbers in parenthesis indicate the number of patients with the given condition. The missing oxygen on the dark side: Ig-induced hemolysis in patients on Ig treatment. Black bars indicate the number of patients with a given clinical condition. A significant proportion of patients receiving IVIG develop a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) detectable after 24 h for up to 10 days after the IVIG infusion (109, 110). However, it should be underlined that the DAT positivity due to the factors mentioned above (111, 112) is not sufficient per se to diagnose hemolysis and DAT positivity does not necessarily imply the presence of active hemolysis. DAT-positive mild hemolytic reactions can be easily missed and the true incidence of such reactions is difficult to document without careful clinical and laboratory follow-up. In the majority of reports on HA, intravascular red blood cell (RBC) destruction via complement activation or extravascular RBC sequestration and removal by the reticulo-endothelial system was proposed to result from IgG alloantibodies with specificity for RBC antigens A, B, D, or C. Hemolytic anemia induced by high-dose IVIG has an average incidence of 5.8% (85). Low-dose IgG replacement therapy is considered universally as safe, and only few cases of hemolysis following low-dose IVIG or SCIG administration have been described (80, 95, 110). A baseline WBC and RBC count prior to IVIG initiation and a close clinical and laboratory follow-up was suggested as a useful tool for early diagnosis and treatment. A possible work up might be to check hemoglobin (Hb) level prior and 48–78 h after Ig infusion. In case of a drop of Hb, the presence of DAT, an increase in unconjugated bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and reduced haptoglobin level, followed by a rise in reticulocyte count should be assessed (Figure 7). We systematically reviewed case reports related to IVIG-induced hemolysis from 1987 to 2014 and identified 29 articles containing reports of 109 patients. Baseline characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 2. When available, blood group, DAT, Hb drop, and outcome are indicated. All reports showed positive DAT, except for a case of Yin et al. (87); in this case, DAT was performed 10 days after IVIG administration and the DAT negativity might have been due to a rapid removal of sensitized RBCs.
Figure 7

Monitoring for evidence of oxygen missing at the dark side. Diagnostic algorithm for Ig-induced hemolysis according to criteria elaborated by the Canadian Group (83).

Monitoring for evidence of oxygen missing at the dark side. Diagnostic algorithm for Ig-induced hemolysis according to criteria elaborated by the Canadian Group (83). In the majority of patients, the outcome was positive: 106 out of 109 patients recovered with or without packed RBC transfusions; three patients died after HA, with the hemolytic episode representing a precipitating factor of a severe underlying condition. Elution experiments were performed and the search for blood group antibodies revealed anti-A and anti-B specificity in the majority of cases; anti-D specificity was assessed in four reports, often associated with other specificities (95, 106, 110). A search for other specificities such as anti-band 3 or anti-Gal was not performed. Only one report detected anti-C specificity in three patients; in one of them associated with anti-D irregular antibodies (110). Although studies were restricted to blood group antibodies, this finding demonstrated that polyvalent IgG preparations might contain clinically significant non-blood group antibodies, which are not part of the lot-release criteria in that their titration is not yet required by the European Pharmacopeia. Antibodies in HA, such as anti-C, may have unexpected hemolytic consequences (113–117). Beside passive transfer of alloantibodies, IgG administration also has been demonstrated to lead to unspecific enhanced erythrocyte sequestration, in particular, in patients with underlying inflammatory disorders (109, 118). In 2009, the Canadian IVIG Hemolysis Pharmacovigilance Group elaborated criteria to define an “IVIG-induced hemolysis” (83). They included a reduction of Hb levels ≥1 g within 10 days after Ig administration, with appearance of a positive DAT and, at least, two of the following criteria: increase in the reticulocyte count, elevation of LDH and unconjugated bilirubin serum levels, low haptoglobin, hemoglobinuria, hemoglobinemia, presence of significant spherocytosis, in the absence of alternative causes of anemia. The passive transfer of IgG alloantibodies through IgG concentrates is difficult to explain as polyvalent IgG is prepared from plasma of thousands of donors. Since immunization to RBC alloantigens can occur because of past transfusions or pregnancy, the hypothetical numbers of alloimmunized plasma donors should be rather low. Recently, other mechanisms underlying alloimmunization related to molecular mimicry have been demonstrated (119). The mechanism of high-dose IVIG-induced HA is complex and it might vary from patient to patient. IVIG cause hemolysis due to: (i) disease-associated pre-coating of RBCs; (ii) IgG with hemolysis triggered by passive transfer of IgG binding to blood group antigens; (iii) transfer of high levels of alloantibodies to RBC pre-coated at a low level only; or (iv) transfer of clinically tolerable levels of isoagglutinins plus transfer of additional RBC-reacting physiological autoantibodies. Indeed, hemolytic reactions could not be related exclusively to transfer of alloantibodies. Hence, antibodies other than histo-blood group alloantibodies (pre-)coated to RBCs might contribute to hemolysis in IgG recipients need to be identified. In addition, hemolytic episodes may possibly be precipitated by some sort of complexed/denatured IgG that co-purify with other IgG in the product (76, 109, 118, 120). Recently, a two hit mechanism for IVIG-induced hemolysis has been proposed: the passive transfer of alloantibodies through IVIG representing the first hit and the underlying inflammatory state representing the second hit (121). Nowadays all commercial Ig products have to undergo anti-A and anti-B testing and regulatory requirement ask for respective IgG antibody titers of ≤1:64 at 5% solution strength (w/v) (103, 104). Nevertheless, hemolysis might occur even in recipients of IgG products that meet these specifications (76). Consequently, it has been suggested that IgG recipients should be monitored for clinical signs and symptoms of hemolysis (122).

Reduction of histo-blood group A and B alloantibodies in IgG concentrates raises the chance for staying on the sunny side of the moon

With the detection of the immunomodulatory potential of IgG concentrates, their clinical use has continuously increased (123). To cover the need, at a first glance, an increase of the volume of plasma fractionated seems to be the most convenient option. However, this might economically not be viable because fractionation of plasma products is interconnected (124) and before increasing output of one product (e.g., IVIG), the market absorbance of the other products as well (e.g., albumin) must be ascertained. On a longer-run, a more viable option is to improve recovery. Considering recovery, the cold-ethanol fractionation apparently has reached its limits. As of today, four manufactures have invested into a “modern” fractioning technique on the basis of ion-exchange chromatography. Ion-exchange chromatography allows elevated recovery at high purity. As of today, five IVIGs, one SCIG, and one anti-D concentrate are fractionated by ion-exchange chromatography. Pharmacovigilance has shown that all chromatographically fractionated IVIG and SCIG, more or less prominently, show a tendency for elevated frequencies of hemolytic AEs. Anti-A and anti-B alloantibody titers are now lot-release criteria (see above) as they constitute the major risk parameter for hemolytic reactions mediated by IgG concentrates. To overcome the threat of end up on the dark side of the moon, two manufacturers have taken measures to reduce anti-A and anti-B titers in their IgG products. One measure chosen was adsorption of the alloantibodies by affinity chromatography (125). Reported reduction in both alloantibodies was significant and levels were similar to those in cold-ethanol fractionated immunoglobulins (126). The other measure chosen was reduction in anti-A using an automated indirect agglutination test for donor screening and exclusion of high-titer donations (approximately 5.1%) from plasma pooling and fractionation (127). This measure reduced anti-A in the IgG concentrate by one titer step. To ensure staying on the safe and sunny side, the manufacturer has announced the introduction of an alloanti-A and alloanti-B immune-affinity chromatography step into the manufacturing process (128). Preliminary results indicate depletion in anti-A and anti-B by >80% in investigational lots. Subsequently, we want to discuss possible consequences of (extensive) removal of antibodies reacting with histo-blood group antigens A and B.

Reasoning about antibodies reacting with terminal sugars of the major histo-blood group antigens A and B

Three facts have initiated our thinking about possible consequences of removal of histo-blood group A and B reacting antibodies from IgG concentrates. (I) In collaboration with Hans U. Lutz, formerly Biochemistry ETH Zurich, we have observed the non-intended removal of natural anti-C3 autoantibodies regulating complement activation by large-scale immune-affinity adsorption of IgA from an IgG concentrate (129). Anti-C3 antibodies belong to the family of “NAbs” and have a particular role in homeostasis: they control activation of complement, among others, in the frame of NAb-mediated opsono-phagocytosis of altered or senescent cells, including RBCs (130–132). Thus, the intention to target one particular antibody by affinity chromatography might reduce that antibody specificity but at the same time affect other specificities as well. (II) It should be kept in mind that the blood groups A and B are in fact “histo-blood group” antigens, i.e., they are also found on white blood cells, T lymphocytes, and proteins and also can be found in soluble form (133). Alloantibodies reacting with histo-blood group antigens A and B thus have much broader tissue recognition than RBCs only. In addition, alloanti-A and alloanti-B belong to the population of NAbs recognizing non-self and most likely participate in primary host defense (134). (III) In contrast to cold-ethanol fractionation, where low titers of alloanti-A and alloanti-B are achieved on basis of their isoelectric points (IEPs), the (extensive) immune-affinity removal might affect a much wider IEP range, thereby removing broadly reacting antibodies and impairing some desirable functions of the IgG concentrate. Thus, the struggle for staying on the sunny side of the moon might have consequences for the antibody repertoire in an IgG concentrate. Antibodies reacting with terminal di-, tri-, and tetra-saccharides belong to the large family of human anti-glycan NAbs. Histo-blood group A and B epitopes in terminal position are tetra-saccharides. Alloantibodies to these tetra-saccharides are found in the plasma of healthy individuals depending on the blood group they have. A considerable body of research into the nature of these NAbs has been performed so far, all using for isolation the corresponding terminal di- or tri-saccharides (135–137). Recently, the repertoire and epitope specificity of such immunoglobulins was addressed in depth by including the tetra-saccharide as well (138, 139). It proved that serum of healthy individuals contain respectable amounts of di- or tri-saccharide-reacting NAbs. These NAbs proved to be pseudo-anti-A and pseudo-anti-B NAbs as they are not reacting with the tetra-saccharide of histo-blood groups A and B. In contrast, alloanti-A and -B antibodies able to react with tetra-saccharides are reacting with the corresponding terminal di- and tri-saccharides. Reasoning about the biological role of these “high-titer and population conservative” anti-di- and anti-tri-saccharide NAbs and the consequence of their potential removal by immunoaffinity is outlined below. A population of the anti-glycan NAbs are the anti-αGal NAbs which recognize Galα1-3Gal and Galα1-3(Fucα1-2)Gal epitopes. Anti-αGal NAbs have been described being xenoreactive, recognizing bacterial Galα1-3Gal (140) and having tissue homeostatic function. The daily removal of altered/senescent cells of the body is ~1012. Removal is mainly mediated by apoptosis (no inflammation, no necrosis). RBCs, when they do not encounter a pathological condition, over their life span of 100–120 days remain intact although they shrink, do not undergo apoptosis but progressively become senescent, mainly due to cumulative oxidative stress. Removal of intact RBCs with a daily turnover of ~2 × 1011, corresponding to ~20 g cell mass, is effectuated by increased exposure of otherwise cryptic structures such as spectrin, band 3, or αGal epitopes. These exposed structures are recognized by low affinity, high avidity, C3-bearing NAbs, which promote the efficient removal of intact senescent RBCs (130, 141, 142). Immunoaffinity adsorption by tri-saccharides columns of di- and tri-saccharide reacting NAbs from IgG concentrates can eliminate anti-histo-blood A and B alloantibodies while it also eliminates αGal and this might have a Janus effect. The face directed to the sun tells that adsorbing αGal NAbs reacting with altered and senescent self on RBC might prevent an increase in the IgG load of RBCs over the threshold level of relevant hemolysis in individuals at risk. The face directed to the dark indicate that adsorption of tissue homeostatic antibodies might deprive an IgG concentrate of potentially beneficial antibodies. Although they are NAbs, tri-saccharide reacting antibodies can be induced by feeding bacteria bearing the corresponding carbohydrate epitopes (134). These inducible NAbs are considered to participate in primary host defense. Other antibodies possibly involved in primary host defense are the anti-αGal NAbs. They show a broad specificity and can react with a number of related αGal-terminated oligosaccharides, including those on bacteria (143). Thus, the immunoadsorption of di-and tri-saccharide reacting NAbs might diminish the potential of an IgG concentrate to mediate primary host defense. Therefore, when choosing affinity resins for immunoadsorption, there might be some aspects worth to consider. In summary, the principles of avoiding co-fractionation through cold-ethanol fractionation (144) versus immune-affinity removal of histo-blood group alloantibodies can have an impact on the presence of homeostatic and first-line defense antibodies. According to present knowledge, only resins coated with the corresponding tetra-saccharides can ascertain the selective removal of histo-blood group alloantibodies presumably involved in HA. Resins coated with the corresponding di- and tri-saccharides also remove blood group alloantibodies, however not selectively. Such resins in addition might remove a broad range of NAbs present in IgG concentrates at relative high amounts. In the literature, the use of tri-saccharide-coated resin was reported (145–147). We have found no information available in the public domain indicating which type of resin is/will be used for reduction of the histo-blood group alloantibodies in large-scale fractionation of IgG. Furthermore, we suggest that the effect of reduction of anti-A and ant-B reacting antibodies by immune-affinity on the antibody repertoire of IgG concentrates can only be assessed by, e.g., using pathogens/commensals, which share the saccharide epitopes, that have been used to coat the affinity resins or alternatively by exposing senescent RBCs stripped off the IgGs coated in vivo. Finally, techniques are required, which allow detection of low affinity, high avidity NAbs.

Thrombosis – Falling into a Dark Lunar Crater

IVIG administration-related AEs, including thrombosis, have been extensively described (148). Thrombotic AEs are severe AEs and patients with risk factors require a special care. Reported average incidence of IVIG-induced thrombosis ranges from 3 to 13% (149). Recognized risk factors for IVIG-induced thrombosis include male gender; age >60; diabetes; renal insufficiency, dyslipidemia; hypertension; immobility; coronary disease; pre-existing vascular disease, family history of early thromboembolic disease; atrial fibrillation, high-dose and high-speed IVIG infusions. IVIG-induced thrombosis is reported both as venous events such as thrombosis stroke, pulmonary embolism (PE), deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and arterial ischemia events such as myocardial infarct and stroke. The mechanisms leading to IVIG-associated thrombosis are still not completely clear; three main mechanisms have been proposed, emphasizing the role of an increased blood viscosity causing a hypercoagulable state (150), the role of anticardiolipin antibodies passively transferred through IVIG (151), and the role of factor XIa or other biologically highly active factors passively transferred via IgG concentrates, such as PKA. Avoiding activated coagulation factors in IgG concentrates starts with appropriate anticoagulation of donated blood/plasma, i.e., careful mixing of anticoagulant and sample over the whole donation process. Alterations in an established manufacturing process neglecting appropriate controls can also lead to increased risk of transmission of activated coagulation factors. High MW proteins passively transferred by IVIG are probably contributing to this phenomenon (152). In patients with other risk factors, such as vascular disease, the increase in blood viscosity can precipitate thromboembolic events. As elderly individuals are prone for such AEs, we like to point to the possibility of elevated altered/senescent self-reacting with infused homeostatic NAbs being a possible factor facilitating thrombotic events as well. A relationship between IVIG administration and cerebral vasospasm has also been suggested by Sztajzel et al. (153); blood viscosity is a determinant for oxygen delivery to the tissues, and changes in viscosity can lead to a reduction in cerebral or myocardial perfusion. We systematically reviewed case reports related to IVIG-induced thrombosis from 1986 to 2014 (Figure 8). Literature search identified 35 articles containing reports concerning 65 patients (6, 24, 149, 154–183). When data were available, diagnosis, risk factors, the number of IVIG infusion prior to thrombosis event, and outcome have been indicated. Baseline characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 3. High-dose IVIG induced thromboembolic events in 59 patients at low to medium IVIG doses. Marie et al. (163) observed that the frequency and type of arterial events was inversely related to the time elapsed from IVIG infusion; almost 50% (23 versus 21 reports) of arterial ischemic events occurred within 12 h following IVIG, while about 75% of venous thrombosis occurred after more than 24 h. No correlation between number of infusions and occurrence of AE was observed. The main risk factors observed in this review were hypertension (19 cases, 33% of prevalence), previous vascular disease (18%), and dyslipidemia (17%). Average mortality for thrombotic events was 10% (arterial ischemia 9% versus venous thrombosis 11%, PE representing the main venous fatal event). Predicting IVIG-induced thrombosis is difficult. Risk factors should be assessed for each patient including instrumental exams when needed. Doppler ultrasound can be useful as early diagnostic tool for thrombosis or to detect the presence of abnormal blood flow especially after prolonged immobility. IVIG should be administered at low IR to reduce the risk. The administration of antiplatelet or anticoagulant prophylaxis was suggested in patients with several risk factors (162). However, thrombotic events have been reported even after several previous uncomplicated courses of treatment. In such cases, patients should be examined for signs and symptoms of thrombosis during each courses of IVIG.
Figure 8

Falling into a dark lunar crater while being on Ig treatment. Bars indicate the number of patients with a given clinical condition and Ig-mediated thrombosis.

Table 3

Falling into a deep lunar crater – Ig-induced thrombosis in recipients of polyvalent immunoglobulins.

PublicationNumber of patientsAgeDiagnosisIg dosagePredisposing factorsNumber of IVIG infusion prior to thrombosis eventThrombosis (arterial or venous)Time from the last infusionOutcome
Vinod et al. (154)1>65Guillain-BarrèHighFirstArterial72 hRecovery
Sin et al. (157)1<65Solid organ transplantationHighFirstArterial48 hRecovery post-emergency renal transplant
Min et al. (24)1<65CVIDLow (SCIG)Hypercoagulability (oral contraceptive)SeveralVenousnd
Rajabally et al. (149)5<65 (2), >65 (3)CIDPHighDiabetes (2), hypertension (2), immobility (4), coronary disease (2), arrhythmia (1)First (3), several (2)Arterial (3), venous (2)14 daysRecovery (4), death (1)
Al-Riyami et al. (156)111ITPHighSeveralVenous10 daysRecovery
Iroh et al. (155)113ITPHighEstrogen treatmentFirstVenous12 hDeath
Barada et al. (158)111XLALowSeveralVenousndnd
Lee et al. (159)156ITPHighFirstVenous72 hRecovery
White et al. (160)143DermatomyositisHighFirstArterial2 hRecovery
Feuillet et al. (161)138Multiple sclerosisHighOral contraceptivesSeventhVenous6 daysRecovery
Marie et al. (162)251, 55Polyarteritis nodosa (1), polymyositis (1)HighThird, 15thVenous (2)2 h, 7 daysRecovery
Marie et al. (163)676, 49, 63, 45, 64, 64AHA (1), polymyositis (5)HighHypertension (3), hypercholesterolemia (3)Second, sixth, several (4)Venous (3), arterial (3)2 days, 6 h (5)Recovery
Geller et al. (165)128Streptococcal toxic shock syndromeHighFirstVenous8 daysRecovery
Sheehan et al. (167)143Pemphigus vulgarisHighImmobility, hypertensionFirstVenous16 daysRecovery
Hefer et al. (164)185ITPHighHypertension, chronic myelogenous leukemiaSecondArterial3 hRecovery
Feuillet et al. (166)138Multiple sclerosisHighOral contraceptivesFirstVenousndRecovery
Vucic et al. (168)757, 69, 75, 81, 79, 62, 80CIPD (4), anti-MAG neuropathy (1), multifocal motor neuropathy (1)HighHypertension (3), hypercholesterolemia (3), previous stroke (2), arrhythmia (1)Second (1), third (2), several (5)Arterial (6), venous (1)1 h (2), 2 days (3), 2 weeks (2)Recovery (5)
Stamboulis et al. (169)136CIPDHighHeavy smokerFirstArterialndRecovery
Katz et al. (170)267, 65Pemphigus vulgaris, dermatomyositisHighHypertensionSecond, firstArterial (1), venous (1)6 hRecovery
Zaidan et al. (171)347, 65, 70GBS (1), CIDP (2)HighHypercholesterolaemia (1), diabetes (2)Third (1), several (2)Arterial (3)1 h (2), 1 day (1)Recovery (2)
Brown et al. (172)370, 91, 42CVIDLowDiabetes (1), myocardial infarction (2)Arterial (3)6 hRecovery
Evangelou et al. (173)154CVIDLowHigh platelets countSeveralVenous24 hnd
Emerson et al. (174)254, 33ITP, Evans SyndromeHighObesity (1)SecondArterial (2); venous (1)2 h, 2 daysDeath (1), recovery (1)
Alliot et al. (175)163ITPHighHypertensionFifthVenous3 daysDeath
Sherer et al. (176)2HighVenous
Elkayam et al. (177)460, 41, 67, 67ITP, polymyositis, connective disease, CIPDHighHypercholesterolemia (2), hypertension (2)several (3), first (1)Arterial4 daysRecovery
Go et al. (178)152ITPHighFirstVenous1 dayRecovery
Turner et al. (179)160Miller-Fisher syndromeHighFifthArterial5 daysRecovery
Harkness et al. (180)140CIDPHighHypercholesterolemiaArterial and venous7 daysRecovery
Paolini et al. (181)178ITPHighHypercholesterolemiaFirstArterial7 daysRecovery
Rosenbaum et al. (182)176Miller-Fisher syndromeHighFirstArterial12 hRecovery
Oh et al. (183)117HighSeveralVenous1 dayRecovery
Dalakas et al. (150)262, 52HighSecondVenous (1), arterial (2)7 days, 2 daysDeath (1), recovery (1)
Woodruff et al. (6)472, 73, 62, 83ITPHighHypertension (3), obesity (3), previous stroke (2), previous myocardial infarction (1)Several (4)Arterial (4)2 h (3), 2 days (1)Death (3)

Clinical and immunological characteristics of patients described in case reports.

Numbers in parenthesis indicate the number of patients with the given condition.

Falling into a dark lunar crater while being on Ig treatment. Bars indicate the number of patients with a given clinical condition and Ig-mediated thrombosis. Falling into a deep lunar crater – Ig-induced thrombosis in recipients of polyvalent immunoglobulins. Clinical and immunological characteristics of patients described in case reports. Numbers in parenthesis indicate the number of patients with the given condition. Immunoglobulin G concentrates are widely acknowledged to offer a safe, high-dose, long-term therapy option for a variety of diseases. AEs occur rarely and mainly are mild to moderate. Deviations from this rule of thumb are addressed by authorities and the plasma fractionation industry to achieve corrections. Above, we have reviewed two types of AE which have shown elevated frequency in the near past. We tried to give some insights which might help in reducing frequencies of AEs bed side.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  153 in total

1.  Normal human serum contains natural antibodies reactive with autologous ABO blood group antigens.

Authors:  S H Spalter; S V Kaveri; E Bonnin; J C Mani; J P Cartron; M D Kazatchkine
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Severe hemolytic anemia following high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin administration in a patient with Kawasaki disease.

Authors:  M Nakagawa; N Watanabe; M Okuno; M Kondo; H Okagawa; T Taga
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 10.047

3.  Haemolytic anaemia associated with high dose intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in a child with Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  M Trifa; L Simon; J Hamza; F Bavoux; N Burin des Roziers
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  Deep vein thrombosis after intravenous immunoglobulins associated with methylprednisolone.

Authors:  Lionel Feuillet; Eric Guedj; Nadia Laksiri; Emmanuel Philip; Gilbert Habib; Jean Pelletier; André Ali Cherif
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  Repertoire of human natural anti-glycan immunoglobulins. Do we have auto-antibodies?

Authors:  Nicolai Bovin; Polina Obukhova; Nadezhda Shilova; Evgenia Rapoport; Inna Popova; Maksim Navakouski; Carlo Unverzagt; Marko Vuskovic; Margaret Huflejt
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-02-21

6.  Screening of Canadian Blood Services donors for severe immunoglobulin A deficiency.

Authors:  Douglas S Palmer; Joan O'Toole; Therese Montreuil; Vito Scalia; Qi-Long Yi; Mindy Goldman; Dale Towns
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Hemolytic anemia following high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin administration.

Authors:  K Tamada; M Kohga; H Masuda; K Hattori
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Jpn       Date:  1995-06

8.  Hemoglobinuria and acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis following intravenous immunoglobulin infusion.

Authors:  Christine C Welles; Shouieb Tambra; Richard A Lafayette
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  Hypotension with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy: importance of pH and dimer formation.

Authors:  Monika Kroez; Ernst Jürgen Kanzy; Peter Gronski; Gerhard Dickneite
Journal:  Biologicals       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.856

10.  Hemolytic anemia following intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in patients treated for Kawasaki disease: a report of 4 cases.

Authors:  Roberta Berard; Blair Whittemore; Rosie Scuccimarri
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.054

View more
  15 in total

1.  Multispecialty Rating of Evidence-Based Conditions for Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy Using a 3-Axis Prioritization Algorithm.

Authors:  Jordan S Orange; Matt Johnson; Barb Lennert; Katarzyna Shields; Michael Eaddy
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2017-05

2.  Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia in a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia receiving nivolumab and intravenous immunoglobulin.

Authors:  Sandra D Algaze; Wungki Park; Thomas J Harrington; Raja Mudad
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-03-09

3.  Treatment-associated hemolysis in Kawasaki disease: association with blood-group antibody titers in IVIG products.

Authors:  Christine W Bruggeman; Sietse Q Nagelkerke; Wendy Lau; Cedric Manlhiot; Masja de Haas; Robin van Bruggen; Brian W McCrindle; Rae S M Yeung; Taco W Kuijpers
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-07-28

4.  Risk and safety requirements for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in allergology: World Allergy Organization Statement.

Authors:  Marek L Kowalski; Ignacio Ansotegui; Werner Aberer; Mona Al-Ahmad; Mubeccel Akdis; Barbara K Ballmer-Weber; Kirsten Beyer; Miguel Blanca; Simon Brown; Chaweewan Bunnag; Arnaldo Capriles Hulett; Mariana Castells; Hiok Hee Chng; Frederic De Blay; Motohiro Ebisawa; Stanley Fineman; David B K Golden; Tari Haahtela; Michael Kaliner; Connie Katelaris; Bee Wah Lee; Joanna Makowska; Ulrich Muller; Joaquim Mullol; John Oppenheimer; Hae-Sim Park; James Parkerson; Giovanni Passalacqua; Ruby Pawankar; Harald Renz; Franziska Rueff; Mario Sanchez-Borges; Joaquin Sastre; Glenis Scadding; Scott Sicherer; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn; James Tracy; Vera van Kempen; Barbara Bohle; G Walter Canonica; Luis Caraballo; Maximiliano Gomez; Komei Ito; Erika Jensen-Jarolim; Mark Larche; Giovanni Melioli; Lars K Poulsen; Rudolf Valenta; Torsten Zuberbier
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.084

Review 5.  Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy: a snapshot for the internist.

Authors:  Gianfranco Vitiello; Giacomo Emmi; Elena Silvestri; Gerardo Di Scala; Boaz Palterer; Paola Parronchi
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 5.472

6.  Editorial: Immunoglobulin Therapy in the 21st Century - the Dark Side of the Moon.

Authors:  Albert Farrugia; Marcella Visentini; Isabella Quinti
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Reduction of Isoagglutinin in Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) Using Blood Group A- and B-Specific Immunoaffinity Chromatography: Industry-Scale Assessment.

Authors:  Simon Gerber; Annette Gaida; Nicole Spiegl; Sandra Wymann; Adriano Marques Antunes; Ibrahim El Menyawi; Brigitte Zurbriggen; Alphonse Hubsch; Martin Imboden
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.807

8.  II Brazilian Consensus on the use of human immunoglobulin in patients with primary immunodeficiencies.

Authors:  Ekaterini Simões Goudouris; Almerinda Maria do Rego Silva; Aluce Loureiro Ouricuri; Anete Sevciovic Grumach; Antonio Condino-Neto; Beatriz Tavares Costa-Carvalho; Carolina Cardoso Prando; Cristina Maria Kokron; Dewton de Moraes Vasconcelos; Fabíola Scancetti Tavares; Gesmar Rodrigues Silva Segundo; Irma Cecília Barreto; Mayra de Barros Dorna; Myrthes Anna Barros; Wilma Carvalho Neves Forte
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017

9.  A Pilot Study to Assess Safety and Feasibility of Intrathecal Immunoglobulin for the Treatment of Adults with Tetanus.

Authors:  Huynh Thi Loan; Lam Minh Yen; Evelyne Kestelyn; Nguyen Van Hao; Nguyen Thi Hoang Mai; Duong Bich Thuy; Ha Thi Hai Duong; Nguyen Thi Phuong Dung; Nguyen Hoan Phu; Pham Thi Lieu; Tran Tan Thanh; Ronald Geskus; H Rogier van Doorn; Le Van Tan; Duncan Wyncoll; Nicholas P J Day; Tran Tinh Hien; Guy E Thwaites; Nguyen Van Vinh Chau; C Louise Thwaites
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 10.  Human immune globulin infusion in the management of multifocal motor neuropathy.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jovanovich; Chafic Karam
Journal:  Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis       Date:  2015-12-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.