BACKGROUND: Profiling of donor's antibodies using glycan arrays demonstrated presence of antibodies capable of binding to >100 mammalian glycans or their fragments. For example, relatively high binding to Galα1-4Galβ1-4GlcNAc (P(1)), Galα1-4Galβ1-4Glc (P(k)), Galβ1-3GlcNAc (Le(c)), 4-O-SuGalβ1-4GlcNAc, and GalNAcα1-3GalNAc (Fs) was found in all tested individuals. Affinity isolation using hapten-specific chromatography in combination with epitope mapping revealed their glycotopes. Notably, a significant part of the antibodies was capable of recognizing a fragment of larger glycans, for example, -Galβ1-4Glc of glycolipids, or Fucα1-3GlcNAc motif of Le(X)/Le(Y) antigens. Their epitope specificity did not vary between different healthy individuals. Nominally, all the mentioned immunoglobulins could be classified as auto-antibodies. METHODS: In this work we re-evaluated results published earlier and analyzed new data to address the question why autologous antibodies found in healthy individuals do not cause severe auto-immune reactions. RESULTS: In all cases the presumably "auto" antibodies were found to bind short fragments "subtracted" from larger glycans whereas recognition of the same fragment in the context of the whole natural chain was completely abolished. Thus, in spite of numerous formally positive signals observed on the printed glycan array, we are yet unable to identify in blood serum of healthy individuals true auto-antibodies capable of binding carbohydrate chains in their naturally occurring form. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: The identified natural anti-glycan antibodies were found to be specific, high-titer and population conservative immunoglobulins - all of this suggesting as yet unknown biological role(s) of the studied proteins. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Glycoproteomics.
BACKGROUND: Profiling of donor's antibodies using glycan arrays demonstrated presence of antibodies capable of binding to >100 mammalianglycans or their fragments. For example, relatively high binding to Galα1-4Galβ1-4GlcNAc (P(1)), Galα1-4Galβ1-4Glc (P(k)), Galβ1-3GlcNAc (Le(c)), 4-O-SuGalβ1-4GlcNAc, and GalNAcα1-3GalNAc (Fs) was found in all tested individuals. Affinity isolation using hapten-specific chromatography in combination with epitope mapping revealed their glycotopes. Notably, a significant part of the antibodies was capable of recognizing a fragment of larger glycans, for example, -Galβ1-4Glc of glycolipids, or Fucα1-3GlcNAc motif of Le(X)/Le(Y) antigens. Their epitope specificity did not vary between different healthy individuals. Nominally, all the mentioned immunoglobulins could be classified as auto-antibodies. METHODS: In this work we re-evaluated results published earlier and analyzed new data to address the question why autologous antibodies found in healthy individuals do not cause severe auto-immune reactions. RESULTS: In all cases the presumably "auto" antibodies were found to bind short fragments "subtracted" from larger glycans whereas recognition of the same fragment in the context of the whole natural chain was completely abolished. Thus, in spite of numerous formally positive signals observed on the printed glycan array, we are yet unable to identify in blood serum of healthy individuals true auto-antibodies capable of binding carbohydrate chains in their naturally occurring form. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: The identified natural anti-glycan antibodies were found to be specific, high-titer and population conservative immunoglobulins - all of this suggesting as yet unknown biological role(s) of the studied proteins. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Glycoproteomics.
Authors: Andreas Geissner; Anika Reinhardt; Christoph Rademacher; Timo Johannssen; João Monteiro; Bernd Lepenies; Michel Thépaut; Franck Fieschi; Jana Mrázková; Michaela Wimmerova; Frank Schuhmacher; Sebastian Götze; Dan Grünstein; Xiaoqiang Guo; Heung Sik Hahm; Jeyakumar Kandasamy; Daniele Leonori; Christopher E Martin; Sharavathi G Parameswarappa; Sandip Pasari; Mark K Schlegel; Hidenori Tanaka; Guozhi Xiao; You Yang; Claney L Pereira; Chakkumkal Anish; Peter H Seeberger Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nina S Prasanphanich; Xuezheng Song; Jamie Heimburg-Molinaro; Anthony E Luyai; Yi Lasanajak; Christopher E Cutler; David F Smith; Richard D Cummings Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: J Sebastian Temme; Jennifer A Crainic; Laura M Walker; Weizhun Yang; Zibin Tan; Xuefei Huang; Jeffrey C Gildersleeve Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2022-09-08 Impact factor: 5.486
Authors: Sharad Purohit; Daron G Ferris; Manual Alvarez; Paul M H Tran; Lynn K H Tran; David P Mysona; Diane Hopkins; Wenbo Zhi; Boying Dun; John J Wallbillich; Richard D Cummings; Peng George Wang; Jin-Xiong She Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2020-01-17 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Yoshihide Nanno; Eric Sterner; Jeffrey C Gildersleeve; Bernhard J Hering; Christopher Burlak Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2019-11-24 Impact factor: 3.788