Literature DB >> 25697194

Comparative immunogenicity assessment: a critical consideration for biosimilar development.

Patrick M Liu1, Linglong Zou, Chanchal Sadhu, Wenyan D Shen, Steffen Nock.   

Abstract

An appropriate assessment strategy with validated anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays is critical for comparative evaluation of immunogenicity between a proposed biosimilar and its reference product. The strategy should aim to identify potential differences in immune responses between these products. While an ADA assay employing the proposed biosimilar product as the detecting reagent has been generally recommended for such evaluation, a product-specific assay using the product of interest may be of use as it offers a capability of detecting antibodies against specific epitopes from the respective product. Regardless of assay strategy, the performance of the assay must be fully assessed and method needs to be validated to meet the comparative purpose of immunogenicity assessment.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25697194     DOI: 10.4155/bio.14.311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioanalysis        ISSN: 1757-6180            Impact factor:   2.681


  9 in total

1.  Recommendations for the Development and Validation of Immunogenicity Assays in Support of Biosimilar Programs.

Authors:  Francesca Civoli; Aparna Kasinath; Xiao-Yan Cai; Meenu Wadhwa; Andrew Exley; Philip Oldfield; Safa Alvandkouhi; Gregor Schaffar; John Chappell; Ronald Bowsher; Viswanath Devanarayan; Joseph Marini; Shannon Rebarchak; Michael Anderson; Vera Koppenburg; Todd Lester
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  A Phase I, Randomized, Single-Dose Study to Evaluate the Biosimilarity of QL1206 to Denosumab Among Chinese Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Min Wu; Xiaoxue Zhu; Cuiyun Li; Xiaojiao Li; Jixuan Sun; Chengjiao Liu; Quan Liu; Wei Wei; Junqi Niu; Yanhua Ding
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 3.  Biosimilars: Key regulatory considerations and similarity assessment tools.

Authors:  Carol F Kirchhoff; Xiao-Zhuo Michelle Wang; Hugh D Conlon; Scott Anderson; Anne M Ryan; Arindam Bose
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Sensitivity of Pegfilgrastim Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Parameters to Product Differences in Similarity Studies.

Authors:  Ari Brekkan; Luis Lopez-Lazaro; Elodie L Plan; Joakim Nyberg; Suresh Kankanwadi; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  A randomized phase-I pharmacokinetic trial comparing the potential biosimilar tocilizumab (QX003S) with the reference product (Actemra®) in Chinese healthy subjects.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Xiaojiao Li; Jingrui Liu; Cuiyun Li; Min Wu; Xiaoxue Zhu; Jixuan Sun; Min Fang; Yanhua Ding
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

Review 6.  Assessing the Immunogenicity of Biopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Carlos Pineda; Gilberto Castañeda Hernández; Ira A Jacobs; Daniel F Alvarez; Claudio Carini
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 7.  Reviewing the evidence for biosimilars: key insights, lessons learned and future horizons.

Authors:  Till Uhlig; Guro L Goll
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 7.580

8.  Barriers to Oncology Biosimilars Uptake in the United States.

Authors:  Chadi Nabhan; Amy Valley; Bruce A Feinberg
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-07-26

Review 9.  Integrating Biosimilars Into Oncology Practice: Implications for the Advanced Practitioner.

Authors:  Christopher J Campen
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2017-11-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.