Literature DB >> 31792633

Recommendations for the Development and Validation of Immunogenicity Assays in Support of Biosimilar Programs.

Francesca Civoli1, Aparna Kasinath2, Xiao-Yan Cai3, Meenu Wadhwa4, Andrew Exley5, Philip Oldfield6, Safa Alvandkouhi7, Gregor Schaffar8, John Chappell9, Ronald Bowsher10, Viswanath Devanarayan11, Joseph Marini12, Shannon Rebarchak12, Michael Anderson13, Vera Koppenburg14, Todd Lester7.   

Abstract

For biosimilar drug development programs, it is essential to demonstrate that there are no clinically significant differences between the proposed biosimilar therapeutic (biosimilar) and its reference product (originator). Based on a stepwise comprehensive comparability exercise, the biosimilar must demonstrate similarity to the originator in physicochemical characteristics, biological activity, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety, including immunogenicity. The goal of the immunogenicity assessment is to evaluate potential differences between the proposed biosimilar product and the originator product in the incidence and severity of human immune responses. Establishing that there are no clinically meaningful differences in the immune response between the products is a key element in the demonstration of biosimilarity. An issue of practical, regulatory, and financial importance is to establish whether a two-assay (based on the biosimilar and originator respectively) or a one-assay approach (based on the biosimilar) is optimal for the comparative immunogenicity assessment. This paper recommends the use of a single, biosimilar-based assay for assessing immunogenic similarity in support of biosimilar drug development. The development and validation of an ADA assay used for a biosimilar program should include all the assessments recommended for an innovator program (10-16, 29). In addition, specific parameters also need to be evaluated, to gain confidence that the assay can detect antibodies against both the biosimilar and the originator. Specifically, the biosimilar and the originator should be compared in antigenic equivalence, to assess the ability of the biosimilar and the originator to bind in a similar manner to the positive control(s), as well as in the confirmatory assay and drug tolerance experiments. Practical guidance for the development and validation of anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays to assess immunogenicity of a biosimilar in comparison to the originator, using the one-assay approach, are described herein.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADA; Anti-drug antibodies; Biosimilar; Immunogenicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31792633     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-019-0386-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  25 in total

1.  An acid dissociation bridging ELISA for detection of antibodies directed against therapeutic proteins in the presence of antigen.

Authors:  Aaron Patton; Michael C Mullenix; Steven J Swanson; Eugen Koren
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 2.  Recommendations and requirements for the design of bioanalytical testing used in comparability studies for biosimilar drug development.

Authors:  Xiao-Yan Cai; Dominique Gouty; Sharon Baughman; Ms Ramakrishnan; Constance Cullen
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Report on the AAPS Immunogenicity Guidance Forum.

Authors:  Heather Myler; Boris Gorovits; Kelli Phillips; Viswanath Devanarayan; Adrienne Clements-Egan; George R Gunn; Susan Kirshner; Binodh DeSilva; Vinod P Shah
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  Demonstrating biosimilar and originator antidrug antibody binding comparability in antidrug antibody assays: a practical approach.

Authors:  Janka Ryding; Michael Stahl; Martin Ullmann
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Feedback from the European Bioanalysis Forum: focus workshop on current analysis of immunogenicity: best practices and regulatory hurdles.

Authors:  Joanne Goodman; Simon Cowen; Viswanath Devanarayan; David Egging; Thomas Emrich; Michaela Golob; Daniel Kramer; Jim McNally; James Munday; Robert Nelson; João A Pedras-Vasconcelos; Timo Piironen; Denise Sickert; Venke Skibeli; Marianne Scheel Fjording; Philip Timmerman
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Drug levels, anti-drug antibodies, and clinical efficacy of the anti-TNFα biologics in rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  C C Mok; D van der Kleij; G J Wolbink
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  A breakthrough novel method to resolve the drug and target interference problem in immunogenicity assays.

Authors:  Jad Zoghbi; Yuanxin Xu; Ryan Grabert; Valerie Theobald; Susan Richards
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  2016 White Paper on recent issues in bioanalysis: focus on biomarker assay validation (BAV): (Part 3 - LBA, biomarkers and immunogenicity).

Authors:  Susan Richards; Lakshmi Amaravadi; Renuka Pillutla; Herbert Birnboeck; Albert Torri; Kyra J Cowan; Apollon Papadimitriou; Fabio Garofolo; Christina Satterwhite; Steven Piccoli; Bonnie Wu; Corinna Krinos-Fiorotti; John Allinson; Flora Berisha; Laurent Cocea; Stephanie Croft; Stephanie Fraser; Fabrizio Galliccia; Boris Gorovits; Swati Gupta; Vinita Gupta; Sam Haidar; Charles Hottenstein; Akiko Ishii-Watabe; Darshana Jani; John Kadavil; John Kamerud; Daniel Kramer; Virginia Litwin; Gustavo Mendes Lima Santos; Robert Nelson; Yan Ni; João Pedras-Vasconcelos; Yongchang Qiu; Paul Rhyne; Afshin Safavi; Yoshiro Saito; Natasha Savoie; Kara Scheibner; Eginhard Schick; Patricia Y Siguenza; John Smeraglia; Roland F Staack; Meena Subramanyam; Giane Sumner; Theingi Thway; David Uhlinger; Martin Ullmann; Alessandra Vitaliti; Jan Welink; Chan C Whiting; Li Xue; Rong Zeng
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 9.  Immunogenicity assessment of biotherapeutic products: An overview of assays and their utility.

Authors:  Meenu Wadhwa; Ivana Knezevic; Hye-Na Kang; Robin Thorpe
Journal:  Biologicals       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 1.856

10.  "Cytokine storm" in the phase I trial of monoclonal antibody TGN1412: better understanding the causes to improve preclinical testing of immunotherapeutics.

Authors:  Richard Stebbings; Lucy Findlay; Cherry Edwards; David Eastwood; Chris Bird; David North; Yogesh Mistry; Paula Dilger; Emily Liefooghe; Isabelle Cludts; Bernard Fox; Gill Tarrant; Jane Robinson; Tony Meager; Carl Dolman; Susan J Thorpe; Adrian Bristow; Meenu Wadhwa; Robin Thorpe; Stephen Poole
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.422

View more
  2 in total

1.  Candidate Bevacizumab Biosimilar CT-P16 versus European Union Reference Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Claire Verschraegen; Zoran Andric; Fedor Moiseenko; Tamta Makharadze; Sergii Shevnya; Alona Oleksiienko; Eduardo Yañez Ruiz; SungHyun Kim; KeumYoung Ahn; TaeHong Park; Sijin Park; Hana Ju; Yuichiro Ohe
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 7.744

2.  Immunogenicity of LY2963016 insulin glargine and Lantus® insulin glargine in Chinese patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Weimin Wang; Xiang Song; Ying Lou; Liying Du; Dalong Zhu; Zhiguang Zhou
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 6.408

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.