Literature DB >> 25697051

Analysis of implant-failure predictors in the posterior maxilla: a retrospective study of 1395 implants.

Andreas Max Pabst1, Christian Walter2, Sebastian Ehbauer2, Isabella Zwiener3, Thomas Ziebart2, Bilal Al-Nawas2, Marcus Oliver Klein4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze predictors for dental implant failure in the posterior maxilla. A database was created to include patients being treated with dental implants posterior to the maxillary cuspids. Independent variables thought to be predictive of potential implant failure included (1) sinus elevation, (2) implant length, (3) implant diameter, (4) indication, (5) implant region, (6) timepoint of implant placement, (7) one-vs. two-stage augmentation, and (8) healing mode. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of predictors 1-3 on implant failure as dependent variable. The predictors 4-9 were analyzed strictly descriptively. The final database included 592 patients with 1395 implants. The overall 1- and 5-year implant survival rates were 94.8% and 88.6%, respectively. The survival rates for sinus elevation vs. placement into native bone were 94.4% and 95.4%, respectively (p = 0.33). The survival rates for the short (<10 mm), the middle (10-13 mm) and the long implants (>13 mm) were 100%, 89% and 76.8%, respectively (middle-vs. long implants p = 0.62). The implant survival rates for the small- (<3.6 mm), the middle- (3.6-4.5 mm) and the wide diameter implants (>4.5 mm) were 92.5%, 87.9% and 89.6%, respectively (p = 0.0425). None of the parameters evaluated were identified as predictor of implant failure in the posterior maxilla.
Copyright © 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implant; Implant diameter; Implant failure predictor; Implant length; Posterior maxilla; Sinus elevation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25697051     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  10 in total

1.  Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Novel Transalveolar Sinus Floor Elevation Technique.

Authors:  Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Anahita Moscowchi; Zeinab Zamani; Reza Amid
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-08-27

2.  Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants-a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs.

Authors:  Ricardo de Oliveira Silva; Fabrício Passador; Paulo Henrique Ferreira Caria
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-11-25

3.  The factors that influence postoperative stability of the dental implants in posterior edentulous maxilla.

Authors:  Yun-Ho Kim; Na-Rae Choi; Yong-Deok Kim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-01-05

4.  Clinical and radiological evaluation of implants placed with osteotome sinus lift technique: 19-month follow-up.

Authors:  Bijan Movahedian Attar; Samaneh Alaei; Hamid Badrian; Amin Davoudi
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec

5.  Retrospective study to identify associations between clinician training and dental implant outcome and to compare the use of MATLAB with SAS.

Authors:  Jyoti Sonkar; Pooja Maney; Qingzhao Yu; Archontia Palaiologou
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2019-08-09

6.  Influence of length, diameter and position of the implant in its fracture incidence: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Agda Marobo Andreotti; Daniela Micheline Dos Santos; Adhara Smith Nobrega; Fernanda Pereira de Caxias; Lisiane Cristina Bannwart
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2019-08-14

7.  Implant-Supported Prosthesis Is a Viable Treatment Alternative for American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status 3 Individuals-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Daya Masri; Hiba Masri-Iraqi; Sarit Naishlos; Evgeny Weinberg; Vadim Reiser; Liat Chaushu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  A new concept for implant-borne dental rehabilitation; how to overcome the biological weak-spot of conventional dental implants?

Authors:  Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Björn Rahlf; Rüdiger Zimmerer; Philipp-Cornelius Pott; Majeed Rana
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  Clinical outcome of implants placed in grafted maxillary sinus via lateral approach: A 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Jinhee Ha; Jang-Ho Son; Iel-Yong Sung; Yeong-Cheol Cho; Jong-Ho Choi
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.080

10.  Long-Term Comparison of Survival and Marginal Bone of Implants with and without Sinus Augmentation in Maxillary Molars within the Same Patients: A 5.8- to 22-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Won-Bae Park; Ji-Young Han; Kyung-Lhi Kang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.