Literature DB >> 25696433

Dutch guidelines for interventional cardiology: institutional and operator competence and requirements for training.

W R M Aengevaeren, G J Laarman, M J Suttorp, J M Ten Berg, A J van Boven, M J de Boer, J J Piek, G V A van Ommen, J G F Bronzwaer, P Smits, J W Deckers.   

Abstract

Interventional cardiology is an expanding field within cardiovascular medicine and today it is generally accepted that cardiologists require specific training, knowledge and skills. Hospitals where coronary interventions are performed must be properly equipped and able to provide specialised care. Percutaneous coronary interventions are frequently used for coronary revascularisation. The public should have confidence in the uniformity of high quality care. Therefore, such quality of care should be maintained by certification of the individual operators, general guidelines for institutional requirements and formal audits. The Netherlands Society of Cardiology (NVVC) will be implementing a new registration system for cardiologists with a subspecialisation that will include registration for interventional cardiology. The NVVC asked the Working Group of Interventional Cardiology (WIC) to update the 1994 Dutch guidelines on operator and institutional competence, and requirements for training in interventional cardiology in order to incorporate them into the official directives. The present guidelines represent the expert opinion of the Dutch interventional cardiology community and are in accordance with international regulations. After two rounds of discussion, the NVVC approved the guidelines in November 2004 during the autumn meeting.

Keywords:  cardiovascular medicine; guidelines; interventional cardiology

Year:  2005        PMID: 25696433      PMCID: PMC2497356     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth Heart J        ISSN: 1568-5888            Impact factor:   2.380


  16 in total

Review 1.  American College of Cardiology training statement on recommendations for the structure of an optimal adult interventional cardiology training program: a report of the American College of Cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus documents.

Authors:  J W Hirshfeld; J S Banas; B H Brundage; M Cowley; G J Dehmer; S G Ellis; G A Ewy; D P Faxon; D R Holmes; A K Jacobs; W C Little; R D Magorien; M A Nocero; S Oesterle; C J Pepine; M Taubman; C Tommaso; R E Vlietstra; R Vogel; J S Forrester; P S Douglas; D P Faxon; J D Fischer; G Gregoratos; M J Wolk
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  T M Bashore; E R Bates; P B Berger; D A Clark; J T Cusma; G J Dehmer; M J Kern; W K Laskey; M P O'Laughlin; S Oesterle; J J Popma; R A O'Rourke; J Abrams; E R Bates; B R Brodie; P S Douglas; G Gregoratos; M A Hlatky; J S Hochman; S Kaul; C M Tracy; D D Waters; W L Winters
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.

Authors:  S C Smith; J T Dove; A K Jacobs; J W Kennedy; D Kereiakes; M J Kern; R E Kuntz; J J Popma; H V Schaff; D O Williams; R J Gibbons; J P Alpert; K A Eagle; D P Faxon; V Fuster; T J Gardner; G Gregoratos; R O Russell; S C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Rationale for on-site cardiac surgery for primary angioplasty: a time for reappraisal.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh; Henry H Ting; Peter B Berger; Kirk N Garratt; David R Holmes; Bernard J Gersh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Coronary intervention at hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery: are we pushing the envelope too far?

Authors:  Gregory J Dehmer; D Scott Gantt
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Identification of variables needed to risk adjust outcomes of coronary interventions: evidence-based guidelines for efficient data collection.

Authors:  P C Block; E D Peterson; R Krone; K Kesler; E Hannan; G T O'Connor; K Detre; E C Peterson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Relation of time to treatment and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  David Antoniucci; Renato Valenti; Angela Migliorini; Guia Moschi; Maurizio Trapani; Piergiovanni Buonamici; Giampaolo Cerisano; Leonardo Bolognese; Giovanni Maria Santoro
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Relation between operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of the coronary stent.

Authors:  P D McGrath; D E Wennberg; J D Dickens; A E Siewers; F L Lucas; D J Malenka; M A Kellett; T J Ryan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-12-27       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Relation between hospital primary angioplasty volume and mortality for patients with acute MI treated with primary angioplasty vs thrombolytic therapy.

Authors:  D J Magid; B N Calonge; J S Rumsfeld; J G Canto; P D Frederick; N R Every; H V Barron
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-12-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial--PRAGUE-2.

Authors:  P Widimský; T Budesínský; D Vorác; L Groch; M Zelízko; M Aschermann; M Branny; J St'ásek; P Formánek
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  1 in total

1.  Percutaneous coronary intervention without onsite surgical backup.

Authors:  Gregory J Dehmer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.931

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.