Literature DB >> 25696108

DDDR pacing for symptomatic patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: The first experience in the Netherlands with pacing in HOCM.

H J Achterberg, M G Scheffer, R van Mechelen, M J M Kofflard, F J Ten Cate.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is a primary cardiac disorder with a heterogeneous expression. When medical therapy fails in patients with symptomatic HOCM, three additional therapeutic strategies exist: ventricular septal myectomy, alcohol-induced percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation (PTSMA) of the first septal branch of the anterior descending artery and pacemaker implantation. In this paper we present the results of seven patients in whom a dual-chamber pacemaker was implanted to reduce the gradient in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and to relieve their symptoms.
METHODS: In patients with drug refractory symptomatic HOCM, not eligible for surgery, pacemaker therapy was recommended. Symptomatic HOCM was defined as symptoms of angina and dyspnoea, functional class NYHA 3-4 and a resting LVOT gradient during Doppler echocardiography of more than 2.75 m/s (30 mmHg). In these patients, a dual-chamber pacemaker was implanted with a right ventricular lead positioned in the right ventricular apex and an atrial lead positioned in the right atrial appendage. In all patients the AV setting was programmed between 50 and 100 ms, using Doppler echocardiography to determine the optimal filling and to ensure ventricular capture.
RESULTS: A statistically significant reduction of the LVOT gradient was observed in all patients. The pre-implantation gradient in the LVOT measured by Doppler echocardiography varied from 3-5.8 m/s with a mean of 4.7±1.1 m/s. The post-implantation gradient varied from 1.4-2.6 m/s with a mean of 1.9±0.4 m/s (p<0.001). Symptomatic improvement was present in all patients. NYHA functional class went from 3-4 (mean 3.1±0.5) pre-implantation to 1-2 mean (1.3±0.4) after implantation (p<0.001). During a mean follow-up of 2.3±1.1 years, the improvement in functional class was maintained.
CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results demonstrate that dual-chamber pacing is an effective and safe treatment for symptomatic patients with HOCM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DDDR pacing; hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

Year:  2002        PMID: 25696108      PMCID: PMC2499779     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth Heart J        ISSN: 1568-5888            Impact factor:   2.380


  22 in total

Review 1.  Cardiomyopathy: The diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  E D Wigle
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Therapeutic options in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and severe drug-refractory symptoms.

Authors:  L Fananapazir; D McAreavey
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Decreased coronary flow reserve in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is related to remodeling of the coronary microcirculation.

Authors:  R Krams; M J Kofflard; D J Duncker; C Von Birgelen; S Carlier; M Kliffen; F J ten Cate; P W Serruys
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-01-27       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: acute results and 3-month follow-up in 25 patients.

Authors:  H Seggewiss; U Gleichmann; L Faber; D Fassbender; H K Schmidt; S Strick
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a discussion of nomenclature.

Authors:  B J Maron; S E Epstein
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Electromechanical left ventricular behavior after nonsurgical septal reduction in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  M Y Henein; C A O'Sullivan; I S Ramzy; U Sigwart; D G Gibson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Non-surgical myocardial reduction for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  U Sigwart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-07-22       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Impact of dual-chamber permanent pacing in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with symptoms refractory to verapamil and beta-adrenergic blocker therapy.

Authors:  L Fananapazir; R O Cannon; D Tripodi; J A Panza
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Effects of dual-chamber pacing in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  X Jeanrenaud; J J Goy; L Kappenberger
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-05-30       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Results of permanent dual-chamber pacing in symptomatic nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  R O Cannon; D Tripodi; V Dilsizian; J A Panza; L Fananapazir
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  1 in total

1.  Right ventricular pacing for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: meta-analysis and meta-regression of clinical trials.

Authors:  Ahran D Arnold; James P Howard; Kayla Chiew; William J Kerrigan; Felicity de Vere; Hannah T Johns; Leonid Churlilov; Yousif Ahmad; Daniel Keene; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Graham D Cole; Prapa Kanagaratnam; S M Afzal Sohaib; Amanda Varnava; Darrel P Francis; Zachary I Whinnett
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2019-10-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.