Literature DB >> 1349992

Effects of dual-chamber pacing in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

X Jeanrenaud1, J J Goy, L Kappenberger.   

Abstract

Although attempts have been made to treat hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy with right ventricular pacing, the usual treatment for those refractory to medical therapy is open heart surgery. To assess in detail the value of non-surgical therapy the effects of acute and long-term dual-chamber pacing were investigated in 13 patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy refractory to medical treatment. In the first part of the study, atrioventricular (AV) sequential pacing was found to reduce peak subaortic pressure gradient in 12 of the 13 patients, from 82 (SD 42) to 47 (34) mm Hg (p less than 0.002), without concomitantly reducing aortic blood pressure or cardiac output. This effect was related to AV interval. In the second part of the study, a dual-chamber pacemaker was implanted in 8 patients and programmed to the optimum AV interval for the individual (50-90 ms). Patients were followed up for up to 62 months. Pacing resulted in a significant and long-lasting reduction in severity of angina pectoris (from NYHA class 3 to 1) and dyspnoea (from NYHA class 3 to 2). Echocardiography showed no significant change in septal thickness or left ventricular contractility but there was a trend to a spontaneous decrease in obstruction. In patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, synchronised and ventricular pacing at optimum AV interval for the individual reduces the intraventricular pressure gradient and improves functional tolerance. Since the effect is longlasting, such pacing should be deemed an alternative therapy to surgery in selected cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1349992     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91961-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  32 in total

Review 1.  Developing clinical indication for multisite pacing.

Authors:  L Kappenberger; X Lyon; N Cox; G Girod; J Schlaepfer
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  An equation to predict the changes in peak left ventricular pressure in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy after treatment: application to the administration of disopyramide.

Authors:  K Niki; M Sugawara; S Tanino; K Iwade; S Hosoda; H Kasanuki
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Analysis of dual-chamber pacing as a treatment for refractory limiting symptoms in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  B J Maron
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Implantable dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillator-pacemaker.

Authors:  D Pfeiffer; M Mende; A Hagendorff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Emerging indications for permanent pacing.

Authors:  D L Wolbrette; G V Naccarelli
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Pacing for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy does it work?

Authors:  Q Zaidi; H Zaky; O Aljassim
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2009-08-05

7.  Pacing for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  L Kappenberger
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-02

Review 8.  Potential mechanisms of improvement after various treatments for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  R D Leachman
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1995

9.  Reversible ischaemia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  H Thomson; W Fong; W Stafford; M Frenneaux
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-09

10.  Surgical management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in 2007: what is new?

Authors:  Morgan L Brown; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.