Literature DB >> 25695978

Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report.

Philipp von Roth1, Matthew P Abdel2, W Scott Harmsen2, Daniel J Berry2.   

Abstract

Uncemented jumbo cups are commonly used for acetabular revision because they are technically straightforward to implant and provide good intermediate-term results. Understanding long-term survival is particularly important because this method is common and because jumbo cups do not provide notable bone stock restoration. The purpose of the present study was to determine the twenty-year results of jumbo cup use during revision total hip arthroplasty. In the original publication, we reported on eighty-nine patients who underwent revision with an uncemented jumbo cup with a single design (Harris-Galante) prior to 1993. The Harris Hip Score (HHS), radiographic results, and Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were evaluated. Mean follow-up was twenty years. The mean postoperative HHS was 71 compared with 56 preoperatively (p=0.001). A total of five jumbo cups were revised for aseptic loosening; one, for infection; and one, for recurrent dislocation. Eight liners were revised with retention of the metal acetabular component: six during femoral component revision, one for wear, and one for recurrent dislocations. Twenty-year survivorship was 88% free from aseptic loosening of the metal acetabular component, 85% free from aseptic loosening or radiographic evidence of definite loosening of the metal acetabular component, and 83% free from revision of the metal acetabular component for any reason. The twenty-year results of revision with uncemented jumbo acetabular components demonstrated acceptable clinical outcomes and radiographic stability. These results justify the use of jumbo cups as a common method of acetabular revision.
Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25695978     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  14 in total

1.  [Treatment of acetabular defects with the trabecular metal revision system].

Authors:  G I Wassilew; V Janz; C Perka; M Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Cementless jumbo cups for revision of failed Furlong prosthesis. A case series.

Authors:  Ahmed Salem Eid; Ahmed Kotb; Waleed Elshabrawy
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-08-11

3.  Excellent long-term results of the Müller acetabular reinforcement ring in primary cup revision.

Authors:  Pascal Mueller Greber; Isabella Manzoni; Peter E Ochsner; Thomas Ilchmann; Lukas Zwicky; Martin Clauss
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Acetabular Cup Revision.

Authors:  Young-Ho Kim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2017-09-06

5.  Mid-term outcomes of uncemented or cemented arthroplasty revision following metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty failure: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Zhao Chen; Wenli Chen; Weiguang Yu; Mingdong Zhao; Jinluan Lin; Chaoming Zhou; Hui Chen; Junxing Ye; Xianshang Zeng; Jintao Zhuang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 6.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium.

Authors:  Peter K Sculco; Timothy Wright; Michael-Alexander Malahias; Alexander Gu; Mathias Bostrom; Fares Haddad; Seth Jerabek; Michael Bolognesi; Thomas Fehring; Alejandro Gonzalez DellaValle; William Jiranek; William Walter; Wayne Paprosky; Donald Garbuz; Thomas Sculco
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-09-28

7.  Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Based on 3-Dimensional Reconstruction Technology Using Jumbo Cups.

Authors:  Xianyue Shen; Hao Tian; Yang Li; Jianlin Zuo; Zhongli Gao; Jianlin Xiao
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-05

Review 8.  Pelvic discontinuity: a challenge to overcome.

Authors:  George C Babis; Vasileios S Nikolaou
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-06-28

9.  Cemented versus uncemented total hip replacement for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a retrospective, multicentre study with a mean 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Shuai Mao; Baomin Chen; Ying Zhu; Liang Qian; Jinluan Lin; Xinchao Zhang; Weiguang Yu; Guowei Han
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Acetabular revision in total hip arthroplasty with tantalum augmentation and lyophilized bovine xenograft.

Authors:  Cristiano Valter Diesel; Tiango Aguiar Ribeiro; Marcelo Reuwsaat Guimarães; Carlos Alberto de Souza Macedo; Carlos Roberto Galia
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.