Literature DB >> 25695792

Ultrasound modalities and quantification: developments of multiparametric ultrasonography, a new modality to detect, localize and target prostatic tumors.

Arnoud Postema1, Tim Idzenga, Massimo Mischi, Peter Frinking, Jean de la Rosette, Hessel Wijkstra.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: An imaging tool providing reliable prostate cancer (PCa) detection and localization is necessary to improve the diagnostic pathway with imaging targeted biopsies. This review presents the latest developments in existing and novel ultrasound modalities for the detection and localization of PCa. RECENT
FINDINGS: The ultrasound modalities that were very promising on introduction (HistoScanning and Doppler) have shown a wane in performance when tested in larger patient populations. In the meantime, novel ultrasound modalities have emerged in the field of PCa detection. Modalities, such as shear wave elastography (SWE) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) show very promising results. SWE produces an absolute elasticity measure and removes the need for manual compression of the tissue. The former allows comparison between scans and patients, the latter reduces the interoperator variability. Quantification of CEUS enables easily interpretable and accurate imaging of the microvascular changes associated with clinically significant prostate tumors.
SUMMARY: The novel ultrasound modalities of SWE and CEUS imaging open the door for taking targeted biopsies based on the detection and localization of PCa by these novel modalities. This potentially improves PCa detection wherein significantly reducing the number of biopsy cores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25695792     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  6 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with dispersion analysis for the localization of prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Arnoud W Postema; Maudy C W Gayet; Ruud J G van Sloun; Rogier R Wildeboer; Christophe K Mannaerts; C Dilara Savci-Heijink; Stefan G Schalk; Amir Kajtazovic; Henk van der Poel; Peter F A Mulders; Harrie P Beerlage; Massimo Mischi; Hessel Wijkstra
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  [Ultrasonography of the prostate gland : From B‑image through multiparametric ultrasound to targeted biopsy].

Authors:  F Steinkohl; A Luger; J Bektic; F Aigner
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  A Review of Imaging Methods for Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Saradwata Sarkar; Sudipta Das
Journal:  Biomed Eng Comput Biol       Date:  2016-03-02

4.  Contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound for prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness: The role of normal peripheral zone time-intensity curves.

Authors:  Hui Huang; Zheng-Qiu Zhu; Zheng-Guo Zhou; Ling-Shan Chen; Ming Zhao; Yang Zhang; Hong-Bo Li; Li-Ping Yin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The prostate cancer detection rates of CEUS-targeted versus MRI-targeted versus systematic TRUS-guided biopsies in biopsy-naïve men: a prospective, comparative clinical trial using the same patients.

Authors:  A W Postema; M J V Scheltema; C K Mannaerts; R J G Van Sloun; T Idzenga; M Mischi; M R E Engelbrecht; J J M C H De la Rosette; H Wijkstra
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Correlation between portal vein diameter and craniocaudal length of the spleen.

Authors:  Shah Zaman; Syed Amir Gilani; Raham Bacha; Iqra Manzoor; Zain Ul Hasan
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2019-12-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.