Literature DB >> 25695583

Intrathecal RGS4 inhibitor, CCG50014, reduces nociceptive responses and enhances opioid-mediated analgesic effects in the mouse formalin test.

Seo-Yeon Yoon1, Jiwan Woo, Joon-Oh Park, Eui-Ju Choi, Hee-Sup Shin, Dae-Hyun Roh, Key-Sun Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The regulator of G-protein signaling protein type 4 (RGS4) accelerates the guanosine triphosphatase activity of G(αi) and G(αo), resulting in the inactivation of G-protein-coupled receptor signaling. An opioid receptor (OR), a G(αi)-coupled receptor, plays an important role in pain modulation in the central nervous system. In this study, we examined whether (1) spinal RGS4 affected nociceptive responses in the formalin pain test, (2) this RGS4-mediated effect was involved in OR activation, and (3) the µ-OR agonist-induced antinociceptive effect was modified by RGS4 modulation.
METHODS: Formalin (1%, 20 µL) was injected subcutaneously into the right hindpaws of male 129S4/SvJae×C57BL/6J (RGS4(+/+) or RGS4(-/-)) mice, and the licking responses were counted for 40 minutes. The time periods (seconds) spent licking the injected paw during 0 to 10 minutes (early phase) and 10 to 40 minutes (late phase) were measured as indicators of acute nociception and inflammatory pain response, respectively. An RGS4 inhibitor, CCG50014, and/or a µ-OR agonist, [D-Ala², N-MePhe⁴, Gly-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO), were intrathecally injected 5 minutes before the formalin injection. A nonselective OR antagonist, naloxone, was intraperitoneally injected 30 minutes before the CCG50014 injection.
RESULTS: Mice that received the formalin injection exhibited typical biphasic nociceptive behaviors. The nociceptive responses in RGS4-knockout mice were significantly decreased during the late phase but not during the early phase. Similarly, intrathecally administered CCG50014 (10, 30, or 100 nmol) attenuated the nociceptive responses during the late phase in a dose-dependent manner. The antinociceptive effect of the RGS4 inhibitor was totally blocked by naloxone (5 mg/kg). In contrast, intrathecal injection of DAMGO achieved a dose-dependent reduction of the nociceptive responses at the early and late phases. This analgesic effect of DAMGO was significantly enhanced by the genetic depletion of RGS4 or by coadministration of CCG50014 (10 nmol).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrated that spinal RGS4 inhibited the endogenous or exogenous OR-mediated antinociceptive effect in the formalin pain test. Thus, the inhibition of RGS4 activity can enhance OR agonist-induced analgesia. The enhancement of OR agonist-induced analgesia by coadministration of the RGS4 inhibitor suggests a new therapeutic strategy for the management of inflammatory pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25695583     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  12 in total

1.  Natural Products Discovered in a High-Throughput Screen Identified as Inhibitors of RGS17 and as Cytostatic and Cytotoxic Agents for Lung and Prostate Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Christopher R Bodle; Duncan I Mackie; Michael P Hayes; Josephine H Schamp; Michael R Miller; Michael D Henry; Jonathan A Doorn; Jon C D Houtman; Michael A James; David L Roman
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.050

Review 2.  Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins as drug targets: Progress and future potentials.

Authors:  Joseph B O'Brien; Joshua C Wilkinson; David L Roman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  RGS4 Maintains Chronic Pain Symptoms in Rodent Models.

Authors:  Kleopatra Avrampou; Kerri D Pryce; Aarthi Ramakrishnan; Farhana Sakloth; Sevasti Gaspari; Randal A Serafini; Vasiliki Mitsi; Claire Polizu; Cole Swartz; Barbara Ligas; Abigail Richards; Li Shen; Fiona B Carr; Venetia Zachariou
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Development of a bimolecular luminescence complementation assay for RGS: G protein interactions in cells.

Authors:  Christopher R Bodle; Michael P Hayes; Joseph B O'Brien; David L Roman
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  Mixed-solvent molecular dynamics simulation-based discovery of a putative allosteric site on regulator of G protein signaling 4.

Authors:  Wallace K B Chan; Debarati DasGupta; Heather A Carlson; John R Traynor
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.672

Review 6.  R4 Regulator of G Protein Signaling (RGS) Proteins in Inflammation and Immunity.

Authors:  Zhihui Xie; Eunice C Chan; Kirk M Druey
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Evaluation of the Selectivity and Cysteine Dependence of Inhibitors across the Regulator of G Protein-Signaling Family.

Authors:  Michael P Hayes; Christopher R Bodle; David L Roman
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 8.  RGS proteins as targets in the treatment of intestinal inflammation and visceral pain: New insights and future perspectives.

Authors:  Maciej Salaga; Martin Storr; Kirill A Martemyanov; Jakub Fichna
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.345

9.  Synthesis and Antinociceptive Effect of Some Thiazole-Piperazine Derivatives: Involvement of Opioidergic System in the Activity.

Authors:  Nazlı Turan Yücel; Derya Osmaniye; Ümmühan Kandemir; Asaf Evrim Evren; Özgür Devrim Can; Ümide Demir Özkay
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Screen Targeting Lung and Prostate Cancer Oncogene Identifies Novel Inhibitors of RGS17 and Problematic Chemical Substructures.

Authors:  Christopher R Bodle; Josephine H Schamp; Joseph B O'Brien; Michael P Hayes; Meng Wu; Jonathan A Doorn; David L Roman
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.341

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.