Literature DB >> 25695442

Online Patient Resources for Liposuction: A Comparative Analysis of Readability.

Christina R Vargas1, Joseph A Ricci, Danielle J Chuang, Bernard T Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As patients strive to become informed about health care, inadequate functional health literacy is a significant barrier. Nearly half of American adults have poor or marginal health literacy skills and the National Institutes of Health and American Medical Association have recommended that patient information should be written at a sixth grade level. The aim of this study is to identify the most commonly used online patient information about liposuction and to evaluate its readability relative to average American literacy.
METHODS: An internet search of "liposuction" was performed and the 10 most popular websites identified. User and location data were disabled and sponsored results excluded. All relevant, patient-directed articles were downloaded and formatted into plain text. Articles were then analyzed using 10 established readability tests. A comparison group was constructed to identify the most popular online consumer information about tattooing. Mean readability scores and specific article characteristics were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 80 articles were collected from websites about liposuction. Readability analysis revealed an overall 13.6 grade reading level (range, 10-16 grade); all articles exceeded the target sixth grade level. Consumer websites about tattooing were significantly easier to read, with a mean 7.8 grade level. These sites contained significantly fewer characters per word and words per sentence, as well as a smaller proportion of complex, long, and unfamiliar words.
CONCLUSIONS: Online patient resources about liposuction are potentially too difficult for a large number of Americans to understand. Liposuction websites are significantly harder to read than consumer websites about tattooing. Aesthetic surgeons are advised to discuss with patients resources they use and guide patients to appropriate information for their skill level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25695442     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  6 in total

1.  Making Cancer Health Text on the Internet Easier to Read for Deaf People Who Use American Sign Language.

Authors:  Poorna Kushalnagar; Scott Smith; Melinda Hopper; Claire Ryan; Micah Rinkevich; Raja Kushalnagar
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  SUFE and the internet: are healthcare information websites accessible to parents?

Authors:  Andrea Mc Carthy; Colm Taylor
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2020-10-20

3.  Quality and Health Literacy Demand of Online Heart Failure Information.

Authors:  Maan Isabella Cajita; Tamar Rodney; Jingzhi Xu; Melissa Hladek; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  Readability of Online Materials for Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Pauline Joy F Santos; David A Daar; Keyianoosh Z Paydar; Garrett A Wirth
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01

5.  Health Literacy in Plastic Surgery: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ekaterina Tiourin; Natalie Barton; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-04-13

6.  An Analysis of the Readability of Phacoemulsification Online Resources.

Authors:  David F Santos; Gabriel F Santos Malave; Nasir Asif; Natalio Izquierdo
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.