| Literature DB >> 25694748 |
K Horst1, D Eschbach2, R Pfeifer1, S Hübenthal1, M Sassen3, T Steinfeldt3, H Wulf3, S Ruchholtz2, H C Pape1, F Hildebrand1.
Abstract
Background. Previous studies showed significant interaction between the local and systemic inflammatory response after severe trauma in small animal models. The purpose of this study was to establish a new combined trauma model in pigs to investigate fracture-associated local inflammation and gain information about the early inflammatory stages after polytrauma. Material and Methods. Combined trauma consisted of tibial fracture, lung contusion, liver laceration, and controlled hemorrhage. Animals were mechanically ventilated and under ICU-monitoring for 48 h. Blood and fracture hematoma samples were collected during the time course of the study. Local and systemic levels of serum cytokines and diverse alarmins were measured by ELISA kit. Results. A statistical significant difference in the systemic serum values of IL-6 and HMGB1 was observed when compared to the sham. Moreover, there was a statistical significant difference in the serum values of the fracture hematoma of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and HMGB1 when compared to the systemic inflammatory response. However a decrease of local proinflammatory concentrations was observed while anti-inflammatory mediators increased. Conclusion. Our data showed a time-dependent activation of the local and systemic inflammatory response. Indeed it is the first study focusing on the local and systemic inflammatory response to multiple-trauma in a large animal model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25694748 PMCID: PMC4324980 DOI: 10.1155/2015/126060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
Laboratory parameters: hemoglobin (Hb), base excess (BE), lactate (Lac), and not significant (n.s.).
| 0 h | 2.5 h | 14 h | 24 h | 48 h | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hb trauma (mg/dL) | 91.27 ± 8.35 | 46.36 ± 8.03 | 54.38 ± 7.98 | 54.62 ± 11.07 | 48.23 ± 6.43 |
| Hb sham (mg/dL) | 97.6 ± 13.61 | 90.4 ± 4.56 | 88.2 ± 5.85 | 84.8 ± 4.6 | 71.2 ± 9.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| BE trauma (mmol/L) | 4.09 ± 2.66 | 2.14 ± 3.75 | 6.38 ± 0.89 | 5.73 ± 2.89 | 6.28 ± 1.52 |
| BE sham (mmol/L) | 5.58 ± 1.96 | 6.44 ± 1.64 | 6.03 ± 0.9 | 5.8 ± 1.19 | 7.28 ± 2.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Lac trauma (mmol/L) | 0.89 ± 0.39 | 2.64 ± 2.14 | 0.66 ± 0.21 | 0.9 ± 0.47 | 1.08 ± 1.25 |
| Lac sham (mmol/L) | 1.26 ± 0.46 | 0.84 ± 0.15 | 0.52 ± 0.08 | 0.44 ± 0.11 | 0.56 ± 0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 1Serum IL-6 levels, ∗ = P < 0.05 compared to sham group.
Comparison of serum and fracture hematoma concentrations on 14 h, 24 h, and 48 h.
| 14 h | 24 h | 48 h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serum IL-6 (pg/mL) | 62.35 ± 38.12 | 71.95 ± 54.76 | 79.69 ± 58.59 |
| Hematoma IL-6 (pg/mL) | 3631.65 ± 2992.31 | 2725.91 ± 2370.57 | 1120.99 ± 1561.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Serum IL-8 (pg/mL) | 148.90 ± 25.85 | 161.78 ± 32.92 | 139.71 ± 34.44 |
| Hematoma IL-8 (pg/mL) | 658.29 ± 84.11 | 676.30 ± 181.66 | 877.69 ± 491.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Serum IL-10 (pg/mL) | 64.56 ± 41.83 | 64.55 ± 37.31 | 59.50 ± 30.24 |
| Hematoma IL-10 (pg/mL) | 245.57 ± 131.97 | 262.10 ± 163.15 | 271.47 ± 193.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Serum HMGB1 (ng/mL) | 2.2 ± 1.54 | 4.8 ± 3.9 | 3.01 ± 3.21 |
| Hematoma HMGB1 (ng/mL) | 573.5 ± 504.35 | 351.89 ± 152.79 | 246.79 ± 135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Serum HSP70 (ng/mL) | 47.04 ± 40.07 | 56.06 ± 42.95 | 75.96 ± 59.36 |
| Hematoma HSP70 (ng/mL) | 87.17 ± 95.82 | 84.75 ± 99.81 | 130.61 ± 256.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 2(a) Decreasing fracture hematoma concentration of IL-6, ∗ = P < 0.05 between 14 h and 48 h. (b) Increasing fracture hematoma concentration of IL-8, ∗ = P < 0.05 between 14 h and 48 h.
Figure 3HMGB1 & HSP70 serum concentrations, ∗ = P < 0.05 compared to baseline values and sham animals.
Figure 4(a) Decreasing fracture hematoma concentrations of HMBG1, ∗ = P < 0.05 between 14 h and 48 h. (b) Stable fracture hematoma concentrations of HSP70, ∗ = P < 0.05 between 14 h and 48 h.