| Literature DB >> 28000769 |
K Horst1,2, T P Simon3, R Pfeifer1,2, M Teuben1,2, K Almahmoud1,2, Q Zhi2, S Aguiar Santos4, C Castelar Wembers4, S Leonhardt4, N Heussen5,6, P Störmann7, B Auner7, B Relja7, I Marzi7, A T Haug8, M van Griensven8, M Kalbitz9, M Huber-Lang9, R Tolba10, L K Reiss11, S Uhlig11, G Marx3, H C Pape1, F Hildebrand1.
Abstract
Chest trauma has a significant relevance on outcome after severe trauma. Clinically, impaired lung function typically occurs within 72 hours after trauma. However, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are still not fully elucidated. Therefore, we aimed to establish an experimental long-term model to investigate physiological, morphologic and inflammatory changes, after severe trauma. Male pigs (sus scrofa) sustained severe trauma (including unilateral chest trauma, femur fracture, liver laceration and hemorrhagic shock). Additionally, non-injured animals served as sham controls. Chest trauma resulted in severe lung damage on both CT and histological analyses. Furthermore, severe inflammation with a systemic increase of IL-6 (p = 0.0305) and a local increase of IL-8 in BAL (p = 0.0009) was observed. The pO2/FiO2 ratio in trauma animals decreased over the observation period (p < 0.0001) but not in the sham group (p = 0.2967). Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) revealed differences between the traumatized and healthy lung (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, a clinically relevant, long-term model of blunt chest trauma with concomitant injuries has been developed. This reproducible model allows to examine local and systemic consequences of trauma and is valid for investigation of potential diagnostic or therapeutic options. In this context, EIT might represent a radiation-free method for bedside diagnostics.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28000769 PMCID: PMC5175194 DOI: 10.1038/srep39659
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Mean values (±SD) of hemodynamic and physiologic parameters for the Polytrauma (PT) and Sham groups of animals.
| 0 min | 90 min | 3.5 h | 5.5 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | p-valuea | p-valueb | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71 ± 12 | 170 ± 39c | 86 ± 18c | 97 ± 22c | 74 ± 18c | 79 ± 24 | 84 ± 23 | 0.0035a | 0.0072b | ||
| 78 ± 14 | 82 ± 23 | 85 ± 18 | 84 ± 18 | 64 ± 9 | 64 ± 8 | 70 ± 16 | 0.2312a | |||
| MAP | ||||||||||
| 67 ± 6 | 43 ± 6 | 78 ± 14 | 74 ± 11 | 64 ± 13 | 80 ± 16 | 77±16 | 0.0019a | 0.0009b | ||
| 67 ± 6 | 65 ± 6 | 74 ± 10 | 68 ± 5 | 70 ± 9 | 82 ± 10a | 81 ± 15 | 0.0286a | |||
| LAC | ||||||||||
| 1.54 ± 0.71 | 4.44 ± 1.42c | 1.38 ± 0.37c,d | 1.33 ± 1.64c | 0.67 ± 0.19c | 0.73 ± 0.19 | 0.90 ± 0.56 | <0.0001a | <0.0001b | ||
| 1.68 ± 1.14 | 1.63 ± 0.99 | 0.97 ± 0.21 | 0.72 ± 0.13 | 0.63 ± 0.15 | 0.60 ± 0.06 | 0.75 ± 0.19 | 0.1635a | |||
| pH | ||||||||||
| 7.46 ± 0.03 | 7.42 ± 0.03 | 7.49 ± 0.05d | 7.47 ± 0.08 | 7.48 ± 0.04 | 7.50 ± 0.04 | 7.50 ± 0.04 | 0.0020a | 0.0025b | ||
| 7.47 ± 0.06 | 7.48 ± 0.05 | 7.47 ± 0.03 | 7.48 ± 0.04 | 7.51 ± 0.01 | 7.51 ± 0.01 | 7.50 ± 0.04 | 0.1060a | |||
| BE | ||||||||||
| 3.81 ± 1.88 | 0.38 ± 2.25 | 5.75 ± 1.53d | 4.83 ± 2.84 | 5.23 ± 2.46 | 4.97 ± 1.57 | 4.31 ± 1.76 | 0.0902a | 0.2189b | ||
| 2.83 ± 1.87 | 2.57 ± 2.94 | 4.02 ± 1.81 | 3.90 ± 1.64 | 4.55 ± 0.69 | 3.85 ± 0.49 | 3.43 ± 1.06 | 0.6938a | |||
ap-value for changes over time per group, bp-value for comparison between polytrauma (PT) and sham over time, cp < 0.05 for PT vs. sham, dn = 11 due to temporary technical restrictions with the blood gas analysis device; HR (beats/min), MAP (mmHg), LAC/BE (mmol/l).
Figure 1Progressive decrease in the pO2/FiO2 ratio in the Polytrauma (PT) but not in the Sham group approximated by a cubic spline function with mean values as nodes.
Black dots indicate individual values of PT animals at each measurement moment, grey dots indicate individual values of sham animals at each measurement moment.
Figure 2(a) CT of right lung (coronary view) with signs of lung contusion (white arrows). (b) CT of right lung (horizontal view) with signs of lung contusion (white arrows).
Figure 3Levels of systemic interleukin (IL)-6 over time ratio in the Polytrauma (PT) and the Sham group approximated by a cubic spline function with mean values as nodes.
Black dots indicate individual values of PT animals at each measurement moment, grey dots indicate individual values of sham animals at each measurement moment.
Figure 4IL-8 Concentrations of IL-8 in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in logarithmic scale before (0 h) and 72 h after induction of trauma.
Black dots indicate individual values of PT animals at each measurement moment, grey dots indicate individual values of sham animals at each measurement moment.
Figure 5(a) Lung from Sham group. (b) Traumatized lung. (c) Rib fractures (white arrows).
Figure 6(a) Sham animal. (b) Polytrauma animal.
Figure 7Tidal impedance variation (%) in traumatized (right lung) and non-traumatized (left lung) parenchyma before shock (0 h) and up to 72 h thereafter, approximated by a cubic spline function with mean values as nodes.
Black dots indicate individual values of PT animals at each measurement moment, grey dots indicate individual values of sham animals at each measurement moment.
Mean tidal variation (in % ±SD) in the various regions of interest.
| Time Point | Ventral Lung | Dorsal Lung | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| trauma | healthy | trauma | healthy | |
| ROI 1 | ROI 2 | ROI 3 | ROI 4 | |
| 0 h (n = 12) | 30.9 ± 4.7 | 32.6 ± 4.1 | 17.0 ± 2.6 | 19.4 ± 2.9 |
| 4 h (n = 11) | 16.5 ± 7.9 | 37.4 ± 9.9 | 18.8 ± 6.6 | 27.2 ± 7.4 |
| 24 h (n = 11) | 17.9 ± 12.0 | 37.3 ± 8.6 | 17.7 ± 6.9 | 27.1 ± 9.5 |
| 48 h (n = 11) | 22.8 ± 11.7 | 34.5 ± 11.7 | 18.9 ± 6.8 | 23.8 ± 5.9 |
| 72 h (n = 10) | 27.5 ± 9.2 | 33.1 ± 5.7 | 18.8 ± 4.3 | 20.5 ± 5.1 |
Figure 8Regions of interest and tidal variation before trauma (a), and at 4 h (b), 24 h (c), 48 h (d) and 72 h after trauma (e) in a representative animal, see also82.
Figure 9Time line of the study.
BAL = bronchoalveoar lavage; EIT = electrical impedance tomography; OP = operative stabilization; BGA = blood gas analysis; Volume-Res. = volume resucitation.
Figure 10(a) shows the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) measurement device. (b) placement of the electrodes for EIT.
Figure 11Regions of interest in a typical EIT image. 1: ventral right lung, 2: ventral left lung, 3: dorsal right lung, and 4: dorsal left lung.