Literature DB >> 25694616

Independent evolution of the sexes promotes amphibian diversification.

Stephen P De Lisle1, Locke Rowe2.   

Abstract

Classic ecological theory predicts that the evolution of sexual dimorphism constrains diversification by limiting morphospace available for speciation. Alternatively, sexual selection may lead to the evolution of reproductive isolation and increased diversification. We test contrasting predictions of these hypotheses by examining the relationship between sexual dimorphism and diversification in amphibians. Our analysis shows that the evolution of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is associated with increased diversification and speciation, contrary to the ecological theory. Further, this result is unlikely to be explained by traditional sexual selection models because variation in amphibian SSD is unlikely to be driven entirely by sexual selection. We suggest that relaxing a central assumption of classic ecological models-that the sexes share a common adaptive landscape-leads to the alternative hypothesis that independent evolution of the sexes may promote diversification. Once the constraints of sexual conflict are relaxed, the sexes can explore morphospace that would otherwise be inaccessible. Consistent with this novel hypothesis, the evolution of SSD in amphibians is associated with reduced current extinction threat status, and an historical reduction in extinction rate. Our work reconciles conflicting predictions from ecological and evolutionary theory and illustrates that the ability of the sexes to evolve independently is associated with a spectacular vertebrate radiation.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive radiation; diversification; extinction; macroevolution; sexual conflict; sexual dimorphism

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25694616      PMCID: PMC4345436          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  32 in total

1.  Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

Authors:  A F Agrawal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Michael Doebeli
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism.

Authors:  J E Lovich; J W Gibbons
Journal:  Growth Dev Aging       Date:  1992

4.  Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in mammals.

Authors:  Edward H Morrow; Claudia Fricke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide.

Authors:  Simon N Stuart; Janice S Chanson; Neil A Cox; Bruce E Young; Ana S L Rodrigues; Debra L Fischman; Robert W Waller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Correlated evolution of allometry and sexual dimorphism across higher taxa.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Global patterns of diversification in the history of modern amphibians.

Authors:  Kim Roelants; David J Gower; Mark Wilkinson; Simon P Loader; S D Biju; Karen Guillaume; Linde Moriau; Franky Bossuyt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Ecological speciation by sexual selection.

Authors:  R Lande; M Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1988-07-08       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  The reconstructed evolutionary process.

Authors:  S Nee; R M May; P H Harvey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1994-05-28       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language.

Authors:  Emmanuel Paradis; Julien Claude; Korbinian Strimmer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  5 in total

1.  Chemical antipredator defence is linked to higher extinction risk.

Authors:  Kevin Arbuckle
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.963

2.  Microhabitat change drives diversification in pholcid spiders.

Authors:  Jonas Eberle; Dimitar Dimitrov; Alejandro Valdez-Mondragón; Bernhard A Huber
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.260

3.  Examining the relationship between sexual dimorphism in skin anatomy and body size in the white-lipped treefrog, Litoria infrafrenata (Anura: Hylidae).

Authors:  Collin S Vanburen; David B Norman; Nadia B Fröbisch
Journal:  Zool J Linn Soc       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.286

4.  Complex community-wide consequences of consumer sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; Sebastian J Schrieber; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Disruptive natural selection predicts divergence between the sexes during adaptive radiation.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.