Colin J Henderson1, Amy R Cameron1, Lynsey Chatham1, Lesley A Stanley1, Charles Roland Wolf2. 1. Division of Cancer Research, Medical Research Institute, Jacqui Wood Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK. 2. Division of Cancer Research, Medical Research Institute, Jacqui Wood Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK c.r.wolf@dundee.ac.uk.
Abstract
Many drugs and environmental chemicals which are not directly mutagenic have the capacity to increase the incidence of tumors in the liver and other tissues. For this reason, such compounds are known as nongenotoxic carcinogens. The mechanisms underlying their effects remain unclear; however, their capacity to induce oxidative stress is considered to be a critical step in the carcinogenic process, although the evidence that this is actually the case remains equivocal and sparse. We have exploited a novel heme oxygenase-1 reporter mouse to evaluate the capacity of nongenotoxic carcinogens with different mechanisms of action to induce oxidative stress in the liver in vivo. When these compounds were administered at doses reported to cause liver tumors, marked differences in activation of the reporter were observed. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene and nafenopin were strong inducers of oxidative stress, whereas phenobarbital, piperonyl butoxide, cyproterone acetate, and WY14,643 were, at best, only very weak inducers. In the case of phenobarbital and thioacetamide, the number of LacZ-positive hepatocytes increased with time, and for the latter also with dose. The data obtained demonstrate that although some nongenotoxic carcinogens can induce oxidative stress, it is not a dominant feature of the response to these compounds. Therefore in contrast to the current models, these data suggest that oxidative stress is not a key determinant in the mechanism of nongenotoxic carcinogenesis but may contribute to the effects in a compound-specific manner.
Many drugs and environmental chemicals which are not directly mutagenic have the capacity to increase the incidence of tumors in the liver and other tissues. For this reason, such compounds are known as nongenotoxic carcinogens. The mechanisms underlying their effects remain unclear; however, their capacity to induce oxidative stress is considered to be a critical step in the carcinogenic process, although the evidence that this is actually the case remains equivocal and sparse. We have exploited a novel heme oxygenase-1 reporter mouse to evaluate the capacity of nongenotoxic carcinogens with different mechanisms of action to induce oxidative stress in the liver in vivo. When these compounds were administered at doses reported to cause liver tumors, marked differences in activation of the reporter were observed. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene and nafenopin were strong inducers of oxidative stress, whereas phenobarbital, piperonyl butoxide, cyproterone acetate, and WY14,643 were, at best, only very weak inducers. In the case of phenobarbital and thioacetamide, the number of LacZ-positive hepatocytes increased with time, and for the latter also with dose. The data obtained demonstrate that although some nongenotoxic carcinogens can induce oxidative stress, it is not a dominant feature of the response to these compounds. Therefore in contrast to the current models, these data suggest that oxidative stress is not a key determinant in the mechanism of nongenotoxic carcinogenesis but may contribute to the effects in a compound-specific manner.
The identification and control of carcinogens is central to chemical safety assessment.
Genotoxic carcinogens are relatively easy to distinguish by means of tests for DNA
damage and mutagenesis, but nongenotoxic carcinogens (NGCs) induce tumors by various
alternative mechanisms and can be difficult to identify, other than through classic
rodent bioassays. Mammalian bioassays are used to identify chemical carcinogens, but are
limited by their length (≥2 years) and cost in terms of time, money, animals, and
resources.We are currently engaged in a collaborative European Union (EU) program whose aim is to
speed up the process for identifying NGCs by identifying biomarkers of effect, which can
be detected following short-term administration. This program, the EU Innovative
Medicines Initiative-funded MARCAR project (http://www.imi-marcar.eu/), aims to
identify early biomarkers for nongenotoxic carcinogenesis using a range of
transcriptomic and epigenetic approaches (Braeuning ; Eichner ; Jonker ;
Lempiainen , 2013; Schaap ;
Thomson , 2013, 2014).It is now generally accepted that oxidative stress is a key feature of the mechanism of
action of NGCs (Block and Gorin, 2012;
Klaunig and Kamendulis, 2004; Mena ).
Environmental agents, including NGCs, can directly generate or indirectly induce
increases in cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) concentrations as a consequence of
increased oxidative phosphorylation, cytochrome P450 (P450) activity, peroxisomal
metabolism, and inflammatory cell activation. Such increases in ROS concentrations can
lead to genotoxicity (via the formation of oxidative DNA adducts) and alter gene
expression via interactions with growth factor receptors, signaling pathways, and
transcription factors. Direct interactions with DNA can induce changes in methylation
patterns or oxidative adduct formation. The consequences include cell proliferation,
apoptosis, or necrosis depending on the insult sustained.Oxidative stress leading to continuous release of ROS, possibly associated with P450
induction and activation of nuclear receptors such as the constitutive androstane
receptor (CAR), has been identified as a central feature in the mechanism of action of
NGCs (Kobliakov, 2010). Indeed, uncoupled
oxidation by P450 oxidoreductase and P450s may be a major source of ROS. Cellular ROS
concentrations are tightly regulated by endogenous defense systems including catalase,
superoxide dismutase, and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), the latter being one of the proteins
most highly regulated in vivo and in vitro
by the oxidative stress pathway and a key participant in heme metabolism (Son ).The nature of oxidative stress and the fact that in vivo, it may
be transient make it very difficult to measure. To circumvent this problem, we have
created a novel oxidative stress reporter mouse where the HO-1 promoter is used to drive
the expression of LacZ. We have exploited this system to establish the capacity of a
range of NGCs with different mechanisms of action to induce oxidative stress
in vivo and demonstrate that, although certain of these
compounds have this capacity, it is not a universal feature.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals
Nafenopin (NAF) and WY14,643 (WY) were kind gifts from Bettina Grasl-Kraupp,
Medical University of Vienna, and Michael Schwarz, University of Tübingen,
respectively. All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Poole,
UK).
Generation of the HOD reporter line
The heme oxygenase-1 dual (HOD) reporter mouse line, distinct from that
previously published (Young
), was generated on a C57BL/6J
background by random integration of 2 independent reporter transgenes
constructed by recombination cloning. LacZ-SV40polyA and β-human chorionic
gonadotrophin (βhCG)-SV40polyA mini-gene cassettes were engineered to
contain regions homologous to exons 1 and 2 of the HO-1 gene and substituted
for the endogenous HO-1 exon 1 and intron 1 sequences of a bacterial artificial
chromosome (BAC) clone containing the mouseHO-1 locus (clone RPCI-23 290L07)
(Fig. 1). The resulting HO-1
reporter loci contain most of the HO-1 gene together with 16.5 kb of
upstream promoter and 8 kb of 3′ sequence. Correct positioning of
the LacZ-SV40polyA and βhCG-SV40polyA mini-gene cassettes was confirmed by
sequencing their 5′ and 3′ junction regions and the HOD mouse line
was maintained by random crossing with wild-type C57BL/6J mice, generating
reporter hemizygotes.
FIG. 1.
Transgenic constructs for the heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) dual reporter
with β-galactosidase or β-human chorionic gonadotrophin
(βhCG). Reporter genes shown - LacZ and hCG - are driven by the
HO-1 promoter. Exon 1 and intron 1 of the murine HO-1 gene are
replaced by an ampicillin-resistance (AmpR) cassette; 16.5 kb
of 5′ untranslated sequence, exons 2–5, and 8 kb of
3′ untranslated sequence remain intact. Regulatory elements in
the promoter are shown as follows: AP-2, activator protein-2; C/EBP,
CAAT/enhancer binding protein binding site; HSE, heat shock element;
STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; StRE, stress
response element, structurally and functionally similar to the
antioxidant and TPA response elements, responding to (among others)
AP-1 and Nrf2 transcription factors; UTR, untranslated region; pA,
polyadenylation; EpA signal, early polyadenylation signal; AmpR,
ampicillin-resistance cassette. Adapted from: Ryter
et al. (2006). Physiol. Rev.
86, 563.
Transgenic constructs for the heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) dual reporter
with β-galactosidase or β-human chorionic gonadotrophin
(βhCG). Reporter genes shown - LacZ and hCG - are driven by the
HO-1 promoter. Exon 1 and intron 1 of the murineHO-1 gene are
replaced by an ampicillin-resistance (AmpR) cassette; 16.5 kb
of 5′ untranslated sequence, exons 2–5, and 8 kb of
3′ untranslated sequence remain intact. Regulatory elements in
the promoter are shown as follows: AP-2, activator protein-2; C/EBP,
CAAT/enhancer binding protein binding site; HSE, heat shock element;
STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; StRE, stress
response element, structurally and functionally similar to the
antioxidant and TPA response elements, responding to (among others)
AP-1 and Nrf2 transcription factors; UTR, untranslated region; pA,
polyadenylation; EpA signal, early polyadenylation signal; AmpR,
ampicillin-resistance cassette. Adapted from: Ryter
et al. (2006). Physiol. Rev.
86, 563.For reasons that remain unclear, the βhCG reporter was not secreted in
amounts sufficient to enable detection in either blood or urine, although it
was expressed in the liver (data not shown). This reporter was therefore not
used in the course of this study and will not be discussed further.All animal work was carried out in accordance with the Animals (Scientific
Procedures) Act (1986) and with local ethical approval. Mice were housed in
open-top caging under standard animal house conditions, with ad
libitum access to standard rodent diet (RM1 Special Diet Services,
Essex, UK) and water, and a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle. The HOD
line bred normally exhibited no overt phenotype and yielded genotypes at the
expected Mendelian frequencies.
Animal experiments
Male mice aged between 8 and 22 weeks were assigned randomly to experimental
and control groups (3 per group) and dosed by oral gavage with a heterogeneous
set of compounds. The compounds, their Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS)
numbers, vehicles, and doses are listed in Table 1. Compounds were selected after extensive
discussion by the MARCAR collaborators (Eichner ). Doses reported to
induce tumors in mice in vivo were chosen from publicly
available databases (eg, the Carcinogenic Potency Database: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cpdb/ and the NTP carcinogenicity
database: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/) (Gold ).
Time-matched control groups were treated with the corresponding vehicles, PBS
or corn oil (CO).
TABLE 1.
Compounds and Dosing Regimens Used in This Study
Compound (CAS No.)
Dose/Route (Vehicle)
Dosing Schedule
Rationale for Dosing Regimen Used (All Studies in Mice, Except
*)
CdCl2 (10108-64-2)
4 mg/kg ip (PBS)
Single dose, harvest after 12 h
Induces HO-1 in vivo in *rats and mice
(Alam,
1994)
Ethoxyquin (91-53-2)
350 mg/kg po (corn oil)
Daily for 3 days, harvest after 5 days
Activates Nrf2 as a consequence of metabolism to toxic
electrophile and induces oxidative stress (Hayes et al.,
2000)
1,4-Dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)
600 mg/kg po (corn oil)
Daily for 2 day, harvest after 3 days
Dose used to induce tumors in NGC studies (Kossler
et al., 2015)
Thioacetamide (62-55-5)
20, 62.5, or 125 mg/kg ip (PBS)
Single dose, harvest after 2 days
Higher dose reflects that used to induce tumors
long-term in *rats (Cascales
et al., 1991)
Lower doses were used due to overt toxicity, but used
to induce tumors in NGC studies (Kossler
et al., 2015)
20 mg/kg ip (PBS)
Daily for 7 or 14d, harvest d8 or d15
Nafenopin (3771-19-5)
125 mg/kg po (corn oil)
Single dose, harvest after day 2
Dose used to induce tumors in NGC studies (Reddy
et al., 1976)
WY14,643 (50892-23-4)
200 mg/kg po (corn oil)
Daily for 2 days, harvest after day 3
Dose used to induce tumors in NGC studies (Reddy and Rao,
1978)
Cyproterone acetate (427-51-0)
160 mg/kg po (corn oil)
Single dose, harvest after day 2
Dose used to induce tumors in NGC studies (Kossler
et al., 2015)
Daily for 6 days, harvest after day 7
Piperonyl butoxide (51-03-6)
1200 mg/kg ip (corn oil)
Single dose, harvest after day 2
Dose used to induce tumors in NGC studies (Kossler
et al., 2015)
Reduced dose used due to excess toxicity
600 mg/kg ip (corn oil)
Daily for 7 days, harvest after day 8
Phenobarbital (57-30-7)
80 mg/kg ip (PBS)
Daily for 3 days, harvest after day 4
Conventional dosing regimen used to study CAR
interactions and hyperplastic responses associated with
NGCs (Ross
et al., 2010)
Dose used to induce tumors in C57BL/6 mice (Braeuning
et al., 2014)
0.05% in drinking water
For 28 or 56 days
Compounds and Dosing Regimens Used in This StudyHigher dose reflects that used to induce tumors
long-term in *rats (Cascales
)Lower doses were used due to overt toxicity, but used
to induce tumors in NGC studies (Kossler
)Dose used to induce tumors in NGC studies (Kossler
)Reduced dose used due to excess toxicityConventional dosing regimen used to study CAR
interactions and hyperplastic responses associated with
NGCs (Ross
)Dose used to induce tumors in C57BL/6 mice (Braeuning
)Following exposure of the appropriate duration, mice were euthanized by a
rising concentration of CO2 and tissues were removed as rapidly as
possible. A section of liver was incubated in 1% paraformaldehyde for
4 h at 4°C and transferred to 30% sucrose (in PBS) overnight
at 4°C before being embedded in Shandon M-1 Embedding Matrix (Thermo Fisher
Scientific), frozen in a dry ice-isopentane bath and stored at −80°C
prior to cryosectioning for LacZ detection by histochemical staining. A further
section of the median lobe was fixed in a solution of 1%
paraformaldehyde and Gurr® (VWR International, Leicestershire, UK); the
remaining liver tissue was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at
−80°C for subsequent immunohistochemical analysis.
LacZ staining
Cryosectioning was performed using a Bright Microsystems cryostat with chamber
and sample temperatures set at −30°C. Samples were allowed to
equilibrate to the temperature of the cryostat for 1 h prior to
sectioning. Sections (15 µM) were cut and placed on
polylysine-coated microscope slides (VWR International). For the detection of
β-galactosidase (β-Gal) activity by means of LacZ staining, sections
were preincubated in a humidified chamber, washed twice with LacZ wash (2mM
MgCl2, 0.01% sodium deoxycholate, 0.02% Nonidet-P40
in PBS), covered with LacZ stain (X-gal
[5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside],
25 mg/ml in dimethylformamide, 5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 5mM
potassium ferricyanide-containing LacZ Wash), and placed in a humidified
chamber at 37°C overnight. The next day they were washed in PBS,
counterstained with Nuclear Fast Red, washed twice with distilled water, and
dehydrated in 70% ethanol followed by 95% ethanol. Coverslips
were applied using a water-based mounting gel and images were captured using a
Zeiss light microscope.
Immunohistochemistry and hematoxylin and eosin staining
Samples for immunohistochemical analysis and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)
staining were fixed in a solution of 1% paraformaldehyde and Gurr®.
After overnight fixation at room temperature, they were stored in 70%
ethanol. When required, they were processed using a Shandon Citadel 2000 tissue
processor (Thermo Scientific) and embedded in paraffin wax in a Shandon
HistoCentre 3 embedding center (Thermo Scientific). Sections
(5 µM) were cut using a Shandon Finesse 325 microtome (Thermo
Scientific). The DakoCytomation EnVision® Dual Link System-HRP (DAB+)
kit (Dako Ltd, High Wycombe, UK) was used to carry out immunohistochemical
analysis of 5-µM sections according to manufacturer’s instructions.
Sections were stained using antibodies against β-Gal (Promega z3781) or
HO-1 (AbCam, ab13243) at a dilution of 1:100, and counterstained with
hematoxylin.For H&E staining, 5-µM liver sections were deparaffinized in xylene,
rehydrated in decreasing alcohol concentrations, stained with H&E,
dehydrated in increasing alcohol concentrations, and mounted using DPX mounting
media (Sigma), all according to standard procedures. The sections were
photographed under bright field conditions on a Zeiss Axiocam microscope; the
resulting images were processed with AxioVision software (Zeiss).
Preparation of microsomes
Microsomal fractions were prepared from frozen liver tissue according to
standard procedures. Briefly, tissue samples were homogenized in 10-mM
potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and centrifuged 3 times (twice at 11
000 rpm, 4°C for 20 min then once at 41 000 rpm,
4°C for 80 min), collecting the supernatant into a fresh tube each
time. A sample of the supernatant from the first centrifugation step (lysate)
was retained. The supernatant from the ultracentrifugation step (cytosolic
fraction) was retained and the microsomal pellet was resuspended in 10-mM
potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.25 M sucrose. Protein
content was determined using the Bradford protein assay using bovine serum
albumin as standard and all fractions were stored at −80°C until
required.
Immunoblotting
Lysates and microsomal fractions were separated by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose
membranes according to standard procedures. Membranes were probed with
commercial antibodies against β-Gal (Promega z3781), HO-1 (AbCam,
ab13243), or in-house polyclonal antisera against rat P450s, CYP1A1, CYP2B1,
CYP3A1, and CYP4A1. These have previously been shown to cross-react
specifically with the murine counterparts of their target P450s. The antibody
for Nqo1 was obtained from Abcam (ab2346); the antibody for Gsta1/2 was a kind
gift from Professor John Hayes (Kelly
; O’Connor ).
Commercial antibodies against glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)
(Sigma G9545), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (Abcam, ab2101), and calrecticulin
(AbCam, ab2907) were used as loading controls. Immunoreactive bands were
visualized on x-ray film developed using an Xograph Compact X4 automatic film
processor (Xograph Imaging Systems, Gloucestershire, UK).
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
Snap-frozen liver tissue (50–100 mg) was homogenized in
1 ml of Trizol reagent and RNA was prepared according to the
manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). The resulting RNA
(1 µg) was treated with DNase I and complementary DNA (cDNA)
synthesis was carried out using the ImProm-II™ Reverse Transcription
System (Promega, Southampton, UK) according to the manufacturer’s
protocol. Expression of HO-1 messenger RNA (mRNA) and 18S rRNA = ribosomal RNA
(rRNA) was detected using Taqman Gene Expression primers and probes
Mm00516006_m1 and Hs03003631_g1, respectively (Applied Biosystems, Warrington,
UK). Reactions were carried out in triplicate on a 7500 real-time polymerase
chain reaction machine (Applied Biosystems) and HO-1 gene expression was
calculated in relative to 18S rRNA using the comparative CT method
(http://www3.appliedbiosystems.com/cms/groups/mcb_support/documents/generaldocuments/cms_041435.pdf).
Biochemical analysis of plasma
Blood was harvested at necropsy by cardiac puncture into heparinized tubes.
Plasma was prepared according to standard procedures, snap frozen, and stored
at −80°C. Biochemical analysis for creatinine, alanine
aminotransferase, total bilirubin, glucose, and lactate dehydrogenase was
conducted at the Clinical Pathology Service Laboratory, Medical Research
Council, Harwell, Oxford, UK (http://www.har.mrc.ac.uk/services/pathology/clinical-pathology)
according to standard procedures.
Statistical analysis
Numerical data were analyzed using Microsoft® Office Excel® 2007
(12.0.6683.5002) SP3 MSO (12.0.6683.5000) and are expressed as
mean ± standard deviation based on the entire population
(Excel® STDEVP function). Statistical significance was assessed using
Student’s t test in 2-tailed, 2-sample unequal variance
mode and p values are expressed as
*p ≤ .05,
**p ≤ .01,
***p ≤ .001.
RESULTS
Compounds Which Induce Oxidative Stress Induce HO-1 Reporter Expression in the
Liver
To validate the utility of the model, we investigated whether compounds which
induce oxidative stress activated the HO-1 reporter. The compounds chosen were
cadmium chloride (CdCl2) and ethoxyquin
(6-ethoxy-1,2-dihydro-2,2,4-trimethylquinoline; EQ). The heavy metalcadmium has
been reported to produce ROS via a Fenton-like reaction leading to the generation
of superoxide and hydroxyl radicals resulting in molecular damage and altered
homeostasis (Mena
). Although EQ is usually
considered an antioxidant, it is metabolized to a toxic electrophile by the
cytochrome P450 system (Burka
) and can exert pro-oxidant
effects, including cytotoxicity and oxidative DNA damage, as a result of redox
cycling and generation of free radicals (Skolimowski ).The oral dose of CdCl2 employed (4 mg/kg ip in PBS) was similar
to doses administered to mice in published studies indicating the induction of
oxidative stress at biochemical and transcriptional levels (Abu-Bakar ) and the
dose of EQ used (350 mg/kg po in CO) was similar to those previously
administered to rodents (Buckley and
Klaassen, 2009). Expression of the HO-1 reporter was visualized by
histochemical staining for LacZ activity and confirmed by immunohistochemical
staining for the expressed β-Gal enzyme; expression of the endogenous HO-1
enzyme was also visualized immunohistochemically and morphological effects were
visualized by H&E staining. EQ and CdCl2 induced high levels of
LacZ activity in the liver (Fig. 2A).
This was substantiated by immunohistochemical staining (Fig. 2A) and immunoblotting (Fig. 2B) for β-Gal. Quantitation of β-gal mRNA
expression indicated that CdCl2 and EQ increased β-Gal mRNA
expression compared with PBS (by 15 ± 2- and
10 ± 3-fold, respectively). Endogenous HO-1 protein and mRNA
were also increased by CdCl2 and EQ treatment (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table S1). Zonal expression of HO-1 reporter
expression was observed: Both LacZ staining and expression of HO-1 protein were
more evident in centrilobular regions of the liver after EQ treatment, and more
generally distributed following administration of CdCl2. The
CdCl2-induced changes in expression occurred in the absence of any
evidence of hepatotoxicity. Indeed, plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels
were unchanged after CdCl2 treatment (Supplementary Table S2). In the case of EQ, a slight increase in
ALT was observed, as well as some evidence of hepatocellular necrosis (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Table S2). Together, these data demonstrate that the
expression of the LacZ reporter mirrors that of the endogenous HO-1 gene, both in
terms of mRNA and protein and reporter activity can precede overt toxicity. In
unpublished experiments, we have also demonstrated that the HO-1 reporter is
functional in a number of other tissues such as kidney and brain (Sharkey
et al., unpublished data).
FIG. 2.
Validation of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) reporter using compounds which
induce oxidative stress. Adult male heme oxygenase-1 dual mice
(n = 3) were treated with PBS
(ip), corn oil (po), cadmium chloride (4 mg/kg ip in PBS), or
ethoxyquin (350 mg/kg po in corn oil) as described in Materials
and Methods and Table 1. A,
Histological appearance of liver sections from treated mice:
Histochemical staining for LacZ (cryosections); immunohistochemical
staining for β-galactosidase (β-Gal) (paraffin-embedded
sections); immunohistochemical staining for HO-1 (paraffin-embedded
sections), and hematoxylin and eosin staining (paraffin-embedded
sections)—all stained as described in Materials and Methods.
Representative photomicrographs are shown. B, Immunoblotting of pooled
liver cell lysates or microsomal samples for β-Gal and HO-1,
respectively; loading controls GAPDH (cell lysate) and calreticulin
(microsomal fraction).
Validation of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) reporter using compounds which
induce oxidative stress. Adult male heme oxygenase-1 dual mice
(n = 3) were treated with PBS
(ip), corn oil (po), cadmium chloride (4 mg/kg ip in PBS), or
ethoxyquin (350 mg/kg po in corn oil) as described in Materials
and Methods and Table 1. A,
Histological appearance of liver sections from treated mice:
Histochemical staining for LacZ (cryosections); immunohistochemical
staining for β-galactosidase (β-Gal) (paraffin-embedded
sections); immunohistochemical staining for HO-1 (paraffin-embedded
sections), and hematoxylin and eosin staining (paraffin-embedded
sections)—all stained as described in Materials and Methods.
Representative photomicrographs are shown. B, Immunoblotting of pooled
liver cell lysates or microsomal samples for β-Gal and HO-1,
respectively; loading controls GAPDH (cell lysate) and calreticulin
(microsomal fraction).
Structurally Diverse NGCs Have Compound-specific Effects on HO-1 Reporter
Expression
Having demonstrated induction of the HO-1 reporter by CdCl2 and EQ, we
used a panel of 7 NGCs which induce tumors via different mechanisms to
characterize their capacity to induce oxidative stress. The doses of NGCs were
chosen following extensive literature searches, consultation of databases, and
expert opinion within the MARCAR program on the basis that they induce liver
tumors in long-term carcinogenicity studies, and were the same doses as used in
other published studies using C57BL/6 mice (Braeuning ). No LacZ staining was
observed in liver sections from mice treated with vehicle (PBS or CO) (Figs. 3G and H). The common features of
the response to NGC treatment were that hepatocytes appeared to be the only cell
population affected and the induction of oxidative stress where observed, with one
exception (thioacetamide, TAA), occurred in the absence of toxicity (data not
shown).
FIG. 3.
Nongenotoxic carcinogens have compound-specific effects on hepatic heme
oxygenase-1 (HO-1) reporter induction. Adult male heme oxygenase-1 dual
mice (n = 3) were treated as
described in Materials and Methods and Table 1. A-H, Detection of LacZ in liver
sections by histochemical staining. A, 1,4-dichlorobenzene; B, nafenopin;
C, WY-14,643; D, cyproterone acetate; E, piperonyl butoxide; F,
thioacetamide (TAA), 20 mg/kg; G, corn oil; H. PBS. Arrows
indicate individual LacZ-positive cells; photomicrograph shown in D is
also shown in Figure 5 for
TAA. I, Immunoblotting of pooled liver cell lysates or microsomal samples
for β-galactosidase and HO-1, respectively, with GAPDH as loading
control. J, Immunoblotting of pooled microsomal samples for Cyp1a1,
Cyp2b10, Cyp3a, and Cyp4a10; loading control GAPDH. In I and J,
“Long” refers to a longer exposure of the immunoblot
above.
Nongenotoxic carcinogens have compound-specific effects on hepatic heme
oxygenase-1 (HO-1) reporter induction. Adult male heme oxygenase-1 dual
mice (n = 3) were treated as
described in Materials and Methods and Table 1. A-H, Detection of LacZ in liver
sections by histochemical staining. A, 1,4-dichlorobenzene; B, nafenopin;
C, WY-14,643; D, cyproterone acetate; E, piperonyl butoxide; F,
thioacetamide (TAA), 20 mg/kg; G, corn oil; H. PBS. Arrows
indicate individual LacZ-positive cells; photomicrograph shown in D is
also shown in Figure 5 for
TAA. I, Immunoblotting of pooled liver cell lysates or microsomal samples
for β-galactosidase and HO-1, respectively, with GAPDH as loading
control. J, Immunoblotting of pooled microsomal samples for Cyp1a1,
Cyp2b10, Cyp3a, and Cyp4a10; loading control GAPDH. In I and J,
“Long” refers to a longer exposure of the immunoblot
above.
FIG. 5.
Time response and dose response of hepatic heme oxygenase-1 reporter
expression in response to thioacetamide. Adult male heme oxygenase-1 dual
(HOD) mice (n = 3) were treated
with thioacetamide (TAA) at a fixed dose (20 mg/kg) for 1, 7, or
14 days, or at differing doses (20, 62.5, or 125 mg/kg) for a
fixed time (24 h), as described in the Materials and Methods.
Vehicle controls received PBS. A, Hepatic LacZ reporter expression in HOD
mice treated with TAA (20 mg/kg, ip) daily for 1, 7, or 14 days.
B, Hepatic LacZ reporter expression 24 hours after a single
administration of TAA at the doses indicated. C, Serum alanine
aminotransferase (ALT) levels (mean ± standard
deviation [SD]) in HOD mice treated with TAA (20 mg/kg, ip) daily
for 1, 7, or 14 days. D, Serum ALT levels
(mean ± SD) in HOD mice 24 h after a single
administration of TAA at the doses indicated.
*p ≤ .05,
**p ≤ .01,
***p ≤ .001.
Each NGC treatment yielded distinct patterns of LacZ reporter expression, both in
terms of intensity and localization within the liver. The most marked induction of
LacZ was observed in response to 1,4-dichlorobenzene (DCB). Liver:body weight
ratios remained unchanged after DCB treatment (Supplementary Table S1) and H&E staining was normal (data not
shown). Administration of this compound resulted in strong zonal induction of the
HO-1 promoter (Fig. 3A); centrilobular
hepatocytes stained intensely, while the staining in periportal hepatocytes was
much weaker. Expression of β-Gal and the endogenous HO-1 protein was
profoundly induced by DCB (Fig. 3I)
and the endogenous HO-1 mRNA level was elevated 6.3-fold in DCB-treated mice
compared with CO-treated controls (Supplementary Table S1). Little is known about the molecular mode
of action of DCB; however, we observed strong induction of Cyp2b10 after DCB
treatment (Fig. 3J) suggesting that it
is a CAR ligand. The weak induction of Cyp3a would also be consistent with this
(Fig. 3J, long exposure). This has
been subsequently confirmed by demonstrating the absence of Cyp2b10 induction in
Car null mice (unpublished).In addition to DCB, the only other compound to induce a marked level of HO-1
reporter expression at a dose equivalent to that used in long-term carcinogenicity
studies was NAF (Fig. 3B). Both NAF
and WY act through the same nuclear receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor α (PPARα). The livers of HOD mice treated with NAF exhibited
a distinctive centrilobular pattern of reporter expression (Fig. 3B), while only a few hepatocytes were positive
following WY administration (Fig. 3C).
Both NAF and WY induced immunochemically detectable β-Gal and endogenous HO-1
protein (Fig. 3I), but there was no
significant change in HO-1 mRNA expression with either compounds (Supplementary Table S1). This could be accounted for by the
observation that induction was observed in only a relatively small proportion of
hepatocytes. Alternatively, the increases in mRNA expression could well be
transient (Young
). In relation to their mode of
action, both WY and NAF caused markedly induced Cyp4a expression, consistent with
the activation of PPARα. Also, in the case of WY, an increased liver:body
weight ratio was observed (Supplementary Table S1).Treatment of HOD mice with the antiandrogen cyproterone acetate (CPA) or the
pesticide synergist piperonyl butoxide (PBO) resulted in no or very weak LacZ
staining in individual cells (Figs. 3D
and E). This agrees with the absence of HO-1 mRNA/protein induction (Fig. 3I and Supplementary Table S1). Consistent with reports that CPA is a
pregnane X receptor (PXR) ligand, Cyp3a and Cyp2b10 induction was observed in HOD
mice after short-term CPA treatment (Fig.
3J). None of the P450s examined was affected by PBO. TAA treatment
(20 mg/kg) also resulted in sporadic LacZ-positive hepatocytes (Fig. 3F).To study the effects of the classical NGC phenobarbital (PB), we investigated
changes in reporter activity in a time-dependent manner. PB was administered at
0.05% (wt/vol) in the drinking water, which is the same dose we recently
published induces liver tumors in C57BL/6 mice (Braeuning ). Very few
LacZ-positive hepatocytes were observed 4 days after exposure, but a greater
number was detected at 28 days. This change was not further increased, ie, after
56 days (Fig. 4). As expected, the
liver:body weight ratio was increased at all time points studied and no changes in
ALT were observed.
FIG. 4.
Hepatic heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) reporter expression in response to
phenobarbital depends on the duration of exposure. Adult male heme
oxygenase-1 dual mice (n = 5) were
treated with phenobarbital (PB) ip (80 mg/kg/day) for 4 days or
via drinking water (0.05%) for 28 or 56 days as described in the
Materials and Methods and Table
1. A-C, Detection of LacZ in liver sections by histochemical
staining. A, 4 days; B, 28 days; C, 56 days. Arrows indicate individual
LacZ-positive cells. Photomicrographs at ×20 magnification, bright
field, scale bar = 20µM. D, Liver:body weight
ratios for mice treated with PB as described above
(mean ± standard deviation). Black
bars = vehicle control; gray
bars = PB. Statistical comparison between PB and
vehicle groups at each time point:
*p < .5,
**p < .05,
***p < .001.
Hepatic heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) reporter expression in response to
phenobarbital depends on the duration of exposure. Adult male heme
oxygenase-1 dual mice (n = 5) were
treated with phenobarbital (PB) ip (80 mg/kg/day) for 4 days or
via drinking water (0.05%) for 28 or 56 days as described in the
Materials and Methods and Table
1. A-C, Detection of LacZ in liver sections by histochemical
staining. A, 4 days; B, 28 days; C, 56 days. Arrows indicate individual
LacZ-positive cells. Photomicrographs at ×20 magnification, bright
field, scale bar = 20µM. D, Liver:body weight
ratios for mice treated with PB as described above
(mean ± standard deviation). Black
bars = vehicle control; gray
bars = PB. Statistical comparison between PB and
vehicle groups at each time point:
*p < .5,
**p < .05,
***p < .001.We also looked at the effects of chronic dosing on LacZ staining for CPA, PBO, and
TAA, and for the latter also time, to establish whether more extensive exposure
increased the level of oxidative stress. In the case of TAA, LacZ-positive
hepatocytes were increased both in a dose- and time-dependent manner (Figs. 5A and B). In both experiments,
this was paralleled by an increase in ALT (Figs. 5C and D). At the highest dose of TAA (125 mg/kg), a ring
of LacZ-positive hepatocytes was observed which appeared to be on the periphery of
an area of necrosis (Fig. 5B). This
was observed in only 1 of the 3 mice, although the other 2 animals had clearly
been overwhelmed by the toxicity of the TAA dose as evidenced by H&E staining,
serum ALT, and pathology reports (Supplementary Fig. 1).Time response and dose response of hepatic heme oxygenase-1 reporter
expression in response to thioacetamide. Adult male heme oxygenase-1 dual
(HOD) mice (n = 3) were treated
with thioacetamide (TAA) at a fixed dose (20 mg/kg) for 1, 7, or
14 days, or at differing doses (20, 62.5, or 125 mg/kg) for a
fixed time (24 h), as described in the Materials and Methods.
Vehicle controls received PBS. A, Hepatic LacZ reporter expression in HOD
mice treated with TAA (20 mg/kg, ip) daily for 1, 7, or 14 days.
B, Hepatic LacZ reporter expression 24 hours after a single
administration of TAA at the doses indicated. C, Serum alanine
aminotransferase (ALT) levels (mean ± standard
deviation [SD]) in HOD mice treated with TAA (20 mg/kg, ip) daily
for 1, 7, or 14 days. D, Serum ALT levels
(mean ± SD) in HOD mice 24 h after a single
administration of TAA at the doses indicated.
*p ≤ .05,
**p ≤ .01,
***p ≤ .001.For chronic dosing of CPA and PBO, 6 doses of 160 mg/kg/day po and 7 doses
of 600 mg/kg/day ip were administered, respectively. A lower dose of PBO
was used than in the single dose experiment because of toxicity (data not shown).
These dosing regimens produced increases in liver:body weight ratios for both
compounds (1.85-fold for CPA [not statistically significant] and 1.75-fold for PBO
[p ≤ .05], see Supplementary Table S1). However, although there was a slight
increase in the number of cells staining for LacZ (Fig. 6A), they were still few in number. No induction of
HO-1 or β-Gal was observed by immunoblotting (Fig. 6B), but both CPA and PBO induced Cyp2b10 protein
expression, the former to a greater extent (Fig. 6B). Cyp3a protein expression was observed after CPA treatment,
but not following PBO, while the converse was true for Cyp4a (Fig. 6B). Through the application of CAR and PXR null
mice, we have subsequently shown that this effect is due to the ability of CPA to
induce both CAR and PXR (unpublished).
FIG. 6.
Effects on hepatic heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) reporter expression for
extending the duration of exposure to cyproterone acetate or piperonyl
butoxide. Adult male heme oxygenase-1 dual mice were treated with
cyproterone acetate (160 mg/kg po daily for 6 days), piperonyl
butoxide (600 mg/kg daily for 7 days), or vehicle (corn oil) as
described in Materials and Methods and Table 1. A, Detection of LacZ in liver sections
by histochemical staining; arrows indicate individual LacZ-positive
cells. B, Immunoblotting for β-galactosidase (pooled liver lysates),
HO-1, Cyp1a, Cyp2b, Cyp3a, or Cyp4a (hepatic microsomal samples); loading
controls are GAPDH (liver lysates) and calreticulin (hepatic microsomal
samples).
Effects on hepatic heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) reporter expression for
extending the duration of exposure to cyproterone acetate or piperonyl
butoxide. Adult male heme oxygenase-1 dual mice were treated with
cyproterone acetate (160 mg/kg po daily for 6 days), piperonyl
butoxide (600 mg/kg daily for 7 days), or vehicle (corn oil) as
described in Materials and Methods and Table 1. A, Detection of LacZ in liver sections
by histochemical staining; arrows indicate individual LacZ-positive
cells. B, Immunoblotting for β-galactosidase (pooled liver lysates),
HO-1, Cyp1a, Cyp2b, Cyp3a, or Cyp4a (hepatic microsomal samples); loading
controls are GAPDH (liver lysates) and calreticulin (hepatic microsomal
samples).
Measurement of Nrf2 Target Genes as a Marker of Oxidative Stress
The Nrf2 signaling cascade provides an adaptive response system to toxic
electrophiles and oxidative stress. To establish whether some of the changes
observed may be attributed to the activation of this pathway, we measured the
expression of the Nrf2-regulated genes Gsta1/2 and Nqo1 (Fig. 7). Of the compounds tested, only DCB stimulated a
response robustly and a slight degree of activation was also observed for TAA,
over the respective vehicle controls.
FIG. 7.
Nongenotoxic carcinogens have compound-specific effects on the expression
of Nrf2 target genes. Adult male heme oxygenase-1 dual mice
(n = 3) were treated with
nongenotoxic carcinogen thioacetamide (TAA, 20 mg/kg), cyproterone
acetate, nafenopin, piperonyl butoxide, WY-14,643, 1,4-dichlorobenzene,
and ethoxyquin as described in Materials and Methods and Table 1. PBS was used as a
vehicle control for TAA, with corn oil for the remaining compounds. Liver
cell lysates were prepared, pooled for each treatment, and immunoblotted
for Gsta1/2 and Nqo1 as described in Materials and Methods. Lactate
dehydrogenase was used as a loading control.
Nongenotoxic carcinogens have compound-specific effects on the expression
of Nrf2 target genes. Adult male heme oxygenase-1 dual mice
(n = 3) were treated with
nongenotoxic carcinogen thioacetamide (TAA, 20 mg/kg), cyproterone
acetate, nafenopin, piperonyl butoxide, WY-14,643, 1,4-dichlorobenzene,
and ethoxyquin as described in Materials and Methods and Table 1. PBS was used as a
vehicle control for TAA, with corn oil for the remaining compounds. Liver
cell lysates were prepared, pooled for each treatment, and immunoblotted
for Gsta1/2 and Nqo1 as described in Materials and Methods. Lactate
dehydrogenase was used as a loading control.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we examined the effects of a range of NGCs on oxidative stress through
the application of an HO-1 reporter mouse, the measurement of endogenous HO-1 protein,
and the activation of the Nrf2 signaling cascade. Our data demonstrate marked
differences between compounds to activate these pathways. Using the HO-1 reporter DCB
caused marked induction of oxidative stress in the majority of hepatocytes. NAF and TAA
also caused an oxidative stress response, whereas the other compounds tested had only
marginal effects. Our conclusion from these experiments is that the effects of oxidative
stress on NGC-induced tumorigenesis is likely to be compound specific and does not
represent a universal feature of this process.The mouse liver-specific carcinogen DCB strongly induced centrilobular reporter
expression, corresponding with the known localization of the enzymes responsible for its
oxidative metabolism, CYP1A2 and CYP2E1 (Irie
; Wijsman ), and consistent with the
induction of oxidative stress by its 2,5-dichloroquinone metabolite. It is interesting
to note that quinones are known inducers of the Nrf2 signaling cascade and would explain
the induction of Nrf2-regulated genes by this compound, including HO-1. Generation of
the quinone metabolite has been associated with DNA strand breaks, an effect which is
enhanced under redox cycling conditions and blocked by catalase (Muller, 2002). A carcinogenic mechanism involving metabolism
to hydroquinones has therefore been proposed. However, the ability of DCB to induce
oxidative stress in vivo has been unclear (Suhua ). Our results
provide strong evidence that DCB does induce oxidative stress
in vivo in mouse liver.TAA studies in rats have shown the induction of hepatotoxicity via oxidative stress;
generation of ROS is an early event in pathogenesis and is associated with
transcriptional effects implicating oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation (Natarajan ). This hepatotoxicity has been associated with the expression of the
metabolic activating enzyme CYP2E1 in centrilobular hepatocytes (Shirai ). In our study, the
induction of oxidative stress as a consequence of necrosis in the centrilobular
hepatocytes also appears to be linked to liver damage.Both NAF and WY activate PPARα leading to peroxisome proliferation and are potent
hepatocarcinogens in rodents. The normal activity of peroxisomal enzymes generates ROS
and reactive nitrogen species as byproducts of metabolism, but peroxisomes also possess
mechanisms that participate in the maintenance of redox homeostasis. Increased numbers
of peroxisomes do not, therefore, necessarily lead to cellular oxidative stress and the
role of peroxisomes in inducing and/or preventing oxidative stress and ROS production
remains the subject of discussion (del Rio,
2013). In this study, acute dosing with NAF induced HO-1 reporter and protein
expression in HOD mouse liver (suggesting direct induction of oxidative stress in
hepatocytes), while WY had little effect on the reporter but did induce a slight
increase in HO-1 protein. On this basis, a role for oxidative stress in the mechanism of
action of these compounds cannot be excluded. The difference observed between these
compounds on their ability to induce the HO-1 reporter could be a consequence of the
different dosing regimens used, although there is currently no direct evidence for
oxidative DNA damage due to WY; PPARα-dependent induction of long-patch base
excision repair genes has been observed in C57BL/6J mice treated for 1 month via the
diet (Rusyn ).CPA, PBO, and PB had minimal effects on HO-1 reporter expression. There is little
evidence that CPA, which is an androgen receptor antagonist and PXR ligand, can induce
oxidative stress and this is confirmed by our study. In contrast to CPA,
hepatocarcinogenesis by PBO has been linked to increased ROS produced as a byproduct of
increased microsomal P450 activity which is thought to occur as a result of Cyp1a1
induction (Kawai ; Mena
). It has been suggested that PBO generates
ROS via redox cycling of quinone derivatives and/or P450 catalytic pathways, but it does
not cause mutations, possibly because it concomitantly induces ROS-scavenging
detoxifying enzymes, and contradictory results have been reported regarding
8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine formation due to PBO in mouse liver (Kawai ;
Tasaki ). However, our studies do not support a role for PBO-induced oxidative
stress in its mechanism of carcinogenesis.Several of the compounds tested activated the nuclear receptors CAR or PXR (DCB, CPA,
PB). These compounds exhibited marked differences in their ability to induce oxidative
stress; therefore, the induction of oxidative stress is not a direct consequence of this
interaction. A number of mechanisms have been proposed for the CAR-mediated carcinogenic
effects of PB, including oxidative stress (Klepeisz ). On the basis of the extremely
weak induction of oxidative stress by this compound in our studies, such a mechanism
would seem implausible. It is important to note that the conditions used for our
experiments were the same as those we have recently shown induce CAR activation,
hepatomegaly, and liver tumors in C57BL/6 mice (Braeuning ). As part of our European
collaboration, we have carried out detailed investigations into other mechanisms of
PB-induced carcinogenicity in mice (Lempiainen
; Luisier ). This work has identified a
number of potential CAR-mediated mechanisms. Of particular note are the epigenetic
changes observed in both WT and humanized CAR/PXRmice at the Dlk3-Dio1 gene locus.
These changes are associated with the increased expression of Meg3, a gene that has been
shown to be involved in hepatocarcinogenesis in mice (Wang ). Mechanisms such as
this provide a much more plausible basis for the carcinogenic effects of these compounds
(Lempiainen ; Thomson
, 2014).
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary data are available online at http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org/.
Authors: Ivan Rusyn; Shoji Asakura; Brian Pachkowski; Blair U Bradford; Mikhail F Denissenko; Jeffrey M Peters; Steven M Holland; Janardan K Reddy; Michael L Cunningham; James A Swenberg Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Mirjam M Schaap; Edwin P Zwart; Paul F K Wackers; Ilse Huijskens; Bob van de Water; Timo M Breit; Harry van Steeg; Martijs J Jonker; Mirjam Luijten Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 5.153
Authors: Martijs J Jonker; Oskar Bruning; Maarten van Iterson; Mirjam M Schaap; Tessa V van der Hoeven; Harry Vrieling; Rudolf B Beems; Annemieke de Vries; Harry van Steeg; Timo M Breit; Mirjam Luijten Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2009-08-20 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Raphaëlle Luisier; Harri Lempiäinen; Nina Scherbichler; Albert Braeuning; Miriam Geissler; Valerie Dubost; Arne Müller; Nico Scheer; Salah-Dine Chibout; Hisanori Hara; Frank Picard; Diethilde Theil; Philippe Couttet; Antonio Vitobello; Olivier Grenet; Bettina Grasl-Kraupp; Heidrun Ellinger-Ziegelbauer; John P Thomson; Richard R Meehan; Clifford R Elcombe; Colin J Henderson; C Roland Wolf; Michael Schwarz; Pierre Moulin; Rémi Terranova; Jonathan G Moggs Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Shiva S Forootan; Fiona E Mutter; Anja Kipar; Takao Iwawaki; Ben Francis; Christopher E Goldring; B Kevin Park; Ian M Copple Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 4.379