BACKGROUND: Though hypertension is a commonly studied risk factor for white matter lesions (WMLs), measures of blood pressure may fluctuate depending on external conditions resulting in measurement error. Indicators of arterial stiffening and reduced elasticity may be more sensitive indicators of risk for WMLs in aging; however the interdependent nature of vascular indicators creates statistical complications. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine whether a factor score comprised of multiple vascular indicators would be a stronger predictor of WMLs than traditional measures of blood pressure. METHODS: In a sample of well-characterized nondemented older adults, we used a factor analytic approach to account for variance common across multiple vascular measures while reducing measurement error. The result was a single factor score reflecting arterial stiffness and reduced elasticity. We used this factor score to predict white matter lesion volumes acquired via fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: The combined vascular factor score was a stronger predictor of deep WML (β = 0.42, p < 0.001) and periventricular WML volumes (β = 0.49, p < 0.001). After accounting for the vascular factor, systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements were not significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that a combined measure of arterial elasticity and stiffening may be a stronger predictor of WMLs than systolic and diastolic blood pressure accounting for the multicollinearity associated with a variety of interrelated vascular measures.
BACKGROUND: Though hypertension is a commonly studied risk factor for white matter lesions (WMLs), measures of blood pressure may fluctuate depending on external conditions resulting in measurement error. Indicators of arterial stiffening and reduced elasticity may be more sensitive indicators of risk for WMLs in aging; however the interdependent nature of vascular indicators creates statistical complications. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine whether a factor score comprised of multiple vascular indicators would be a stronger predictor of WMLs than traditional measures of blood pressure. METHODS: In a sample of well-characterized nondemented older adults, we used a factor analytic approach to account for variance common across multiple vascular measures while reducing measurement error. The result was a single factor score reflecting arterial stiffness and reduced elasticity. We used this factor score to predict white matter lesion volumes acquired via fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: The combined vascular factor score was a stronger predictor of deep WML (β = 0.42, p < 0.001) and periventricular WML volumes (β = 0.49, p < 0.001). After accounting for the vascular factor, systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements were not significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that a combined measure of arterial elasticity and stiffening may be a stronger predictor of WMLs than systolic and diastolic blood pressure accounting for the multicollinearity associated with a variety of interrelated vascular measures.
Entities:
Keywords:
Arterial stiffness; factor analysis; magnetic resonance imaging; vascular elasticity; white matter lesions
Authors: Timm H Westhoff; Sven Schmidt; Katja Vallbracht-Israng; Havva Yildirim; Nadine Franke; Fernando Dimeo; Walter Zidek; Markus van der Giet Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Jeffrey M Burns; Jessica A Church; David K Johnson; Chengjie Xiong; Daniel Marcus; Anthony F Fotenos; Abraham Z Snyder; John C Morris; Randy L Buckner Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2005-12
Authors: Jeffrey M Burns; Robyn A Honea; Eric D Vidoni; Lewis J Hutfles; William M Brooks; Russell H Swerdlow Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2011-07-01
Authors: Mariëlle M F Poels; Kèren Zaccai; Germaine C Verwoert; Meike W Vernooij; Albert Hofman; Aad van der Lugt; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Monique M B Breteler; Francesco U S Mattace-Raso; M Arfan Ikram Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Saima Hilal; Monica Saini; Chuen Seng Tan; Joseree Ann Catindig; Yan Hong Dong; Lim Ben Swie Leon; Wiro J Niessen; Henri Vrooman; Tien Yin Wong; Christopher Chen; Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian; Mohammad Kamran Ikram Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: F E de Leeuw; J C de Groot; E Achten; M Oudkerk; L M Ramos; R Heijboer; A Hofman; J Jolles; J van Gijn; M M Breteler Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Jan Cees De Groot; Frank-Erik De Leeuw; Matthijs Oudkerk; Jan Van Gijn; Albert Hofman; Jellemer Jolles; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Ewoud J van Dijk; Monique M B Breteler; Reinhold Schmidt; Klaus Berger; Lars-Göran Nilsson; Matthijs Oudkerk; Andrzej Pajak; Susana Sans; Maria de Ridder; Carole Dufouil; Rebecca Fuhrer; Simona Giampaoli; Lenore J Launer; Albert Hofman Journal: Hypertension Date: 2004-10-04 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Sandra A Billinger; Jesse C Craig; Sarah J Kwapiszeski; Jason-Flor V Sisante; Eric D Vidoni; Rebecca Maletsky; David C Poole Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2017-03-09