Literature DB >> 25690318

International multi-institutional experience with the vessel-sparing technique to reconstruct the proximal bulbar urethra: mid-term results.

Ramón Virasoro1,2, Jack M Zuckerman3, Kurt A McCammon3, Jessica M DeLong3, Jeremy B Tonkin3, Leandro Capiel4, Agustín R Rovegno4, Gabriel Favre5, Carlos R Giudice5, Ehab A Eltahawy6, Uri Gur7, Gerald H Jordan3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present mid-term outcomes from an international, multi-institutional cohort of patients undergoing vessel-sparing excision and primary anastomosis urethroplasty for the reconstruction of the anterior urethra.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 2003 to December 2011, 68 patients underwent vessel-sparing anterior urethral reconstruction at five different international institutions using the vessel-sparing technique described by Jordan et al. (J Urol 177(5):1799-1802, 2007).
RESULTS: Patients' age range was from 3 to 82 years (mean 51.2). Stricture length ranged from 1 to 3 cm (mean 1.78). After a mean follow-up of 17.6 months, 95.6 % of patients had a widely patent urethral lumen. Three patients failed the procedure, requiring either direct vision internal urethrotomy or urethral dilation, after which all were free of symptoms and did not require further instrumentation. Complications were minimal and as expected following open urethroplasty.
CONCLUSION: Preservation of blood supply is a noble pursuit in surgery; however, it can be technically difficult and often requires more time and effort. This vessel-sparing technique for anterior urethral reconstruction is reproducible and appears to be reliable in this international cohort. Larger studies and longer follow-up are needed to support these encouraging results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Excision and primary anastomosis; Urethral stricture; Vessel sparing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25690318     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1512-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  11 in total

1.  End-to-end reconstruction of synchronous urethral strictures.

Authors:  Brian J DeCastro; Shane B Anderson; Allen F Morey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Non-transecting anastomotic bulbar urethroplasty: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Daniela E Andrich; Anthony R Mundy
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Vessel-sparing excision and primary anastomosis (for proximal bulbar urethral strictures).

Authors:  Uri Gur; Gerald H Jordan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Proximal bulbar urethroplasty via extended anastomotic approach--what are the limits?

Authors:  Allen F Morey; William S Kizer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Long-term followup for excision and primary anastomosis for anterior urethral strictures.

Authors:  Ehab A Eltahawy; Ramón Virasoro; Steven M Schlossberg; Kurt A McCammon; Gerald H Jordan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  The technique of vessel sparing excision and primary anastomosis for proximal bulbous urethral reconstruction.

Authors:  Gerald H Jordan; Ehab A Eltahawy; Ramón Virasoro
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  The long-term results of urethroplasty.

Authors:  D E Andrich; N Dunglison; T J Greenwell; A R Mundy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Patient-reported outcomes combined with objective data to evaluate outcomes after urethral reconstruction.

Authors:  Jessica DeLong; Jill Buckley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 9.  De novo erectile dysfunction after anterior urethroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah D Blaschko; Melissa T Sanford; Nadya M Cinman; Jack W McAninch; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  End-to-end urethroplasty: long-term results.

Authors:  E Micheli; A Ranieri; G Peracchia; A Lembo
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Tissue Preservation Techniques at the Time of Urethroplasty for Urethral Stricture Disease.

Authors:  Robert Caleb Kovell; Alexander J Skokan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Reconstruction of Membranous Urethral Strictures.

Authors:  Javier C Angulo; Reynaldo G Gómez; Dmitriy Nikolavsky
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Excision and Primary Anastomosis for Short Bulbar Strictures: Is It Safe to Change from the Transecting towards the Nontransecting Technique?

Authors:  M Waterloos; W Verla; W Oosterlinck; P François; N Lumen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Comparison of efficiency of vascular-preserving urethroplastic methods of the bulbo-membranous part of the urethra.

Authors:  Vladimir Beloborodov; Vladimir Vorobev; Alexey Kalyagin; Igor Seminskiy; Bator Sharakshinov; Sergei Popov; Olga Baklanova
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 1.195

5.  VeSpAR trial: a randomized controlled trial comparing vessel-sparing anastomotic repair and transecting anastomotic repair in isolated short bulbar urethral strictures.

Authors:  Wesley Verla; Marjan Waterloos; Mieke Waterschoot; Benjamin Van Parys; Anne-Françoise Spinoit; Nicolaas Lumen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.