Literature DB >> 12796652

The long-term results of urethroplasty.

D E Andrich1, N Dunglison, T J Greenwell, A R Mundy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We update our long-term data on the effectiveness of urethroplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 166 patients operated on before 1990 are currently under followup or lived at least 10 years after surgery. Anastomotic urethroplasty was performed in 82 patients and substitution urethroplasty in 84.
RESULTS: The 5, 10 and 15-year re-stricture rates after anastomotic urethroplasty were 12%, 13% and 14%, respectively, and the complication rate was 7%. The 5, 10 and 15-year re-stricture rates after substitution urethroplasty were 21%, 31% and 58%, respectively, and the complication rate was 33%.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of anastomotic urethroplasty are good and sustained in the long term, while the results of substitution urethroplasty deteriorate steadily with time and there is definite room for improvement. An anastomotic repair should be performed in preference to a substitution repair when possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12796652     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000069820.81726.00

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  56 in total

1.  Long-term angiogenic activity of free grafts and pedicle flap in a rabbit urethroplasty model.

Authors:  George Vaos; Stefanos Gardikis; Alexandra Giatromanolaki; Katerina Kambouri; Grigorios Trιpsianis; Petros Ypsilantis; Efthimios Sivridis; Constantinos Simopoulos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  A simplified and unified approach to anterior urethroplasty.

Authors:  W Britt Zimmerman; Richard A Santucci
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Standing the test of time: the long-term results of urethroplasty.

Authors:  D N Wood; D E Andrich; T J Greenwell; A R Mundy
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  A retrospective analysis of delayed complications of urethroplasty at a tertiary care centre.

Authors:  Rajkumar Mathur; Gaurav Aggarwal; Bhaskar Satsangi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2011-07-08

Review 5.  Management of the Recurrent Male Urethral Stricture.

Authors:  Uwais B Zaid; Garjae Lavien; Andrew C Peterson
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Trends, utilization, and immediate perioperative complications of urethroplasty in the United States: data from the national inpatient sample 2000-2010.

Authors:  Sarah D Blaschko; Catherine R Harris; Uwais B Zaid; Tom Gaither; Carissa Chu; Amjad Alwaal; Jack W McAninch; Charles E McCulloch; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Primary non-transecting bulbar urethroplasty long-term success rates are similar to transecting urethroplasty.

Authors:  Kirk M Anderson; Stephen A Blakely; Colin I O'Donnell; Dmitriy Nikolavsky; Brian J Flynn
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Characteristics of the urethroplasty and our approach-Experience in patients with urethral stricture.

Authors:  Mehmet Akyüz; Emre Tokuç; Emrah Özsoy; Orhan Koca; Hüseyin Kanberoğlu; Metin Öztürk; Ramazan Topaktaş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-11-21

9.  Redo-urethroplasty in pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect: an audit.

Authors:  Suresh K Bhagat; Ganesh Gopalakrishnan; Santosh Kumar; Antony Devasia; Nitin S Kekre
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  The use of suprapubic cystoscopy in perineal urethroplasty.

Authors:  Rahim Horuz; Cemal Göktaş; Ali Cihangir Çetinel; Oktay Akça; Ahmet Selimoğlu; Selami Albayrak
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.