Literature DB >> 2569006

Induction of the adaptive response by X-rays is dependent on radiation intensity.

J D Shadley1, J K Wiencke.   

Abstract

Human lymphocytes pretreated with low (0.01 Gy) but not high (0.5 Gy) doses of X-rays become somewhat refractory to the induction of chromatid deletions by subsequent exposure to high (1.5 Gy) doses of X-rays (i.e. the yield of chromatid deletions is less than the sum of the yields induced by the pre-exposure and the subsequent challenge doses). This adaptive response can also be induced by pretreating the cells with very low, or even high, concentrations of tritiated thymidine. Because high concentrations of tritiated thymidine result in high doses of radiation that are delivered at very low dose-rates (i.e. less than 0.01 Gy/min), the lack of adaptation following high pre-treatment doses of X-rays could be attributed to their higher dose-rates. To test the effect of X-ray intensity on the induction of the adaptive response, lymphocytes were irradiated with 0.5 Gy of X-rays at 0.005-0.5 Gy/min at 28-30 h of culture, and then irradiated with 1.5 Gy at 48 h. Chromatid deletions were measured 6 h later. The results show that 0.5 Gy of X-rays given at low dose-rates (0.005 or 0.01 Gy/min), but not at high dose-rates (0.1, 0.2, or 0.5 Gy/min), are capable of inducing the adaptive response. Furthermore, experiments in which a male subject's cells exposed to 0.5 Gy given at 0.005 Gy/min were cocultivated with a female subject's cells irradiated with 0.5 Gy at 0.5 Gy/min showed that cells exposed to radiation at low and high intensity progress to metaphase equally and, therefore, that the lack of an adaptive response at high dose-rates cannot be attributed to selection of radioresistant cells. Although the induction of the adaptive response at higher X-ray doses occurs at low radiation intensity, there seems to be a minimum dose required for this effect; e.g., 0.01-Gy pretreatments induced the adaptive response when given at 0.2 Gy/min, but not at 0.005 Gy/min. Thus, the adaptive response is dependent both on the total dose of the pretreatment and on the rate at which the dose is given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2569006     DOI: 10.1080/09553008914551231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  29 in total

1.  Adaptive response and split-dose effect of radiation on the survival of mice.

Authors:  Ashu Bhan Tiku; R K Kale
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Smoking and hormesis as confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Will radiation-induced bystander effects or adaptive responses impact on the shape of the dose response relationships at low doses of ionizing radiation?

Authors:  William F Morgan
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Responses to low doses of ionizing radiation in biological systems.

Authors:  Ludwig E Feinendegen; Myron Pollycove; Charles A Sondhaus
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

6.  Modification in the expression of Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex in low dose irradiated human lymphocytes.

Authors:  Sompal Singh; Madhu Bala; Raj Kumar; Anil Kumar; S C Dhiman
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Human lung cancer risks from radon - part I - influence from bystander effects - a microdose analysis.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard; Richard E Thompson; Georgia C Beecher
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Low dose radiation overcomes diabetes-induced suppression of hippocampal neuronal cell proliferation in rats.

Authors:  Jin Oh Kang; Sang Ki Kim; Seong Eon Hong; Taeck Hyun Lee; Chang Ju Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Adaptive responses induced by low dose radiation in dentate gyrus of rats.

Authors:  Jin Oh Kang; Seong Eon Hong; Sang Ki Kim; Chang Ju Kim; Taeck Hyun Lee; Hyun Kyung Chang; Mal Soon Shin; Hong Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  X-ray induced changes in immunostaining of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in V79 hamster fibroblasts.

Authors:  F Lohr; H Hof; K J Weber; D Latz; F Wenz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.