Literature DB >> 25689471

Idarubicin, cytarabine, and pravastatin as induction therapy for untreated acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Mazyar Shadman1,2, Raya Mawad3, Carol Dean1, Tara L Chen4, Kathleen Shannon-Dorcy1, Vicky Sandhu1, Paul C Hendrie5, Bart L Scott1,2, Rol B Walter1,5, Pamela S Becker1,5, John M Pagel3, Elihu H Estey1,5.   

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that idarubicin/cytarabine(ara-C)/pravastatin (IAP) is an active salvage regimen for patients with AML. We therefore investigated this regimen in patients with newly-diagnosed AML or MDS (≥10% blasts). Patients were eligible if the anticipated treatment-related mortality (TRM) was <10%. Patients received pravastatin (1,280 mg/day po; days 1-8), cytarabine (1.5 g/m(2) /day; days 4-7), and idarubicin (12 mg/m(2) /day, days 4-6). Up to 3 cycles of consolidation with a shortened course was permitted. The primary endpoints were "good CR" rate (CR on day 35 without minimal residual disease) and TRM in the first 28 days. The study was to stop if after each cohort of 5 patients (a) the Bayesian posterior probability was < 5% that the true "good CR rate" was ≥ 70% or (b) the posterior probability was >25% that the TRM rate was ≥5%. Twenty-four patients were included. Conventional CR was achieved in 15 (63%) patients but only 12 (50%) achieved "good CR". 4 of 12 (33%) patients with "good CR" relapsed at median of 16 weeks (10.5-19). Five (21%) patients had refractory disease. Survival probability at 1 year was 72% (48.7-64). Two (8.3%) patients died within 28 days from multiorgan failure. The most common grade 3-4 adverse effects were febrile neutropenia (75%) and diarrhea (25%). Based on the stopping rules accrual ceased after entry of these 24 patients. IAP did not meet the predefined efficacy criteria for success. Therefore, we would not recommend this regimen for phase three testing in this patient subset.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25689471      PMCID: PMC4803479          DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  20 in total

1.  Establishment of baseline toxicity expectations with standard frontline chemotherapy in acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Ehab Atallah; Jorge Cortes; Susan O'Brien; Sherry Pierce; Mary Beth Rios; Elihu Estey; Maurie Markman; Michael Keating; Emil J Freireich; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Novel drugs for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  G Montalban-Bravo; G Garcia-Manero
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  Bayesian sequential monitoring designs for single-arm clinical trials with multiple outcomes.

Authors:  P F Thall; R M Simon; E H Estey
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Comparison of idarubicin + ara-C-, fludarabine + ara-C-, and topotecan + ara-C-based regimens in treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia, refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation, or refractory anemia with excess blasts.

Authors:  E H Estey; P F Thall; J E Cortes; F J Giles; S O'Brien; S A Pierce; X Wang; H M Kantarjian; M Beran
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Relation of clinical response and minimal residual disease and their prognostic impact on outcome in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Xueyan Chen; Hu Xie; Brent L Wood; Roland B Walter; John M Pagel; Pamela S Becker; Vicky K Sandhu; Janis L Abkowitz; Frederick R Appelbaum; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Blockade of adaptive defensive changes in cholesterol uptake and synthesis in AML by the addition of pravastatin to idarubicin + high-dose Ara-C: a phase 1 study.

Authors:  Steven M Kornblau; Deborah E Banker; Derek Stirewalt; Danny Shen; Elizabeth Lemker; Srdan Verstovsek; Zeev Estrov; Stefan Faderl; Jorge Cortes; Miloslav Beran; C Ellen Jackson; Wenjing Chen; Elihu Estey; Frederick R Appelbaum
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Effect of time to complete remission on subsequent survival and disease-free survival time in AML, RAEB-t, and RAEB.

Authors:  E H Estey; Y Shen; P F Thall
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  New statistical strategy for monitoring safety and efficacy in single-arm clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; R M Simon; E H Estey
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Cholesterol-modulating agents kill acute myeloid leukemia cells and sensitize them to therapeutics by blocking adaptive cholesterol responses.

Authors:  Henry Y Li; Frederick R Appelbaum; Cheryl L Willman; Richard A Zager; Deborah E Banker
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Cholesterol synthesis and import contribute to protective cholesterol increments in acute myeloid leukemia cells.

Authors:  Deborah E Banker; Sasha J Mayer; Henry Y Li; Cheryl L Willman; Frederick R Appelbaum; Richard A Zager
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-05-25       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Metabolic Plasticity in Blood and Brain Stem Cell Pathophysiology.

Authors:  Catherine J Libby; Jonathan McConathy; Victor Darley-Usmar; Anita B Hjelmeland
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  A comparison of patients with acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome treated on versus off study.

Authors:  Sarah A Buckley; Mary-Elizabeth Percival; Megan Othus; Anna B Halpern; Emily M Huebner; Pamela S Becker; Carole Shaw; Mazyar Shadman; Roland B Walter; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2018-10-02

3.  Current Approaches in the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Nestor R Ramos; Clifton C Mo; Judith E Karp; Christopher S Hourigan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  Drug Repurposing for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Vibeke Andresen; Bjørn T Gjertsen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-11-29

5.  Classic and targeted anti-leukaemic agents interfere with the cholesterol biogenesis metagene in acute myeloid leukaemia: Therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Fangli Chen; Xue Wu; Cristina Niculite; Marilena Gilca; Daniela Petrusca; Adriana Rogozea; Susan Rice; Bin Guo; Shawn Griffin; George A Calin; H Scott Boswell; Heiko Konig
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 6.  Exploiting metabolic vulnerabilities for personalized therapy in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Lucille Stuani; Marie Sabatier; Jean-Emmanuel Sarry
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 7.431

7.  Cancer Drug Response Profile scan (CDRscan): A Deep Learning Model That Predicts Drug Effectiveness from Cancer Genomic Signature.

Authors:  Yoosup Chang; Hyejin Park; Hyun-Jin Yang; Seungju Lee; Kwee-Yum Lee; Tae Soon Kim; Jongsun Jung; Jae-Min Shin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.