| Literature DB >> 25689469 |
Malay Kumar Saha1, Tanmay Mahapatra2, Subrata Biswas1, Piyali Ghosh1, Medo Kire3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dynamics of HIV epidemic are largely understudied among men having sex with men (MSM) in India, while their potentially critical role in HIV spread is often stressed. Unfortunately, the epidemic has probably concentrated in this hard-to-reach population in the north-eastern high HIV-prevalent areas, especially in the bordering state of Nagaland, where HIV prevalence among MSM was found to be 2nd highest in the whole country. Dearth of information regarding the socio-behavioral correlates of HIV acquisition among MSM in this remote hilly region thus called for detailed analyses of the HIV Sentinel Surveillance (HSS) data.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25689469 PMCID: PMC4331270 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117385
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Distribution of socio-demographic, behavioral factors and HIV sero-status among MSM attending HIV sentinel site in Nagaland during 2010–11 (N[1] = 243).
| Continuous variable | Mean | Variance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (in years) | 28.30 | 42.08 | |
| Years of stay in current place of residence | 18.15 | 75.05 | |
| Days, since last sex with a man (missing = 1) | 1.87 | 5.99 | |
| Categorical variable | Categories | Frequency | % |
| Age group | Very young (< 25 years) | 71 | 29.22 |
| Young (25–34 years) | 125 | 51.44 | |
| Older (≥35years) | 47 | 19.34 | |
| Literacy status | Illiterate | 112 | 46.09 |
| Up to 5th standard (Primary school) | 23 | 9.47 | |
| 6th to 10th standard (Middle school) | 69 | 28.40 | |
| 11th to Graduation (High school & above) | 39 | 16.05 | |
| Occupation | Unemployed | 66 | 27.16 |
| Student | 6 | 2.47 | |
| Laborers/Servants/Workers | 63 | 25.93 | |
| Transport workers | 6 | 2.47 | |
| Hotel staff | 5 | 2.06 | |
| Small business | 86 | 35.39 | |
| Service | 11 | 4.53 | |
| Reason for coming to the service point | Collect condoms | 73 | 30.04 |
| For official work | 88 | 36.21 | |
| Drop in center/Meet other MSM | 40 | 16.46 | |
| Recreational purpose | 42 | 17.28 | |
| Self-identified type (missing = 1) | Double decker | 84 | 34.71 |
| Panthi | 20 | 8.26 | |
| Kothi | 138 | 57.02 | |
| Having sex with female in last 6 months | No | 207 | 85.19 |
| Yes | 36 | 14.81 | |
| Received or paid money for having sex with a man in last 12 months | No | 195 | 80.25 |
| Yes, paid money | 4 | 1.65 | |
| Yes, received money | 35 | 14.40 | |
| Both | 9 | 3.70 | |
| IV drug use in last 1 year | No | 243 | 100.00 |
| Yes | 0 | 0.00 | |
| HIV test result | Negative | 210 | 86.42 |
| Positive | 33 | 13.58 | |
1N, Total number of participants.
Distribution[1] of socio-demographic and behavioral characteristics[2] across HIV sero-status among MSM attending HIV sentinel site in Nagaland during 2010–11 (N[3] = 243).
| Socio-demographic and behavioral characteristics | HIV -ve | HIV +ve | p value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous variable | n | Mean | Var | n | Mean | Var | ||
| Age (in years) | 210 | 28.04 | 43.63 | 33 | 29.94 | 30.00 | 0.078 | |
| Years of stay in current place of residence | 210 | 18.45 | 77.16 | 33 | 16.19 | 59.05 | 0.130 | |
|
| 209 | 1.99 | 6.62 | 33 | 1.09 | 1.40 | 0.001 | |
| Categorical variable | Categories | n | % | n | % | p value | ||
| Age group | Very young (< 25 years) | 67 | 31.90 | 4 | 12.12 | 0.061 | ||
| Young (25–34 years) | 103 | 49.05 | 22 | 66.67 | ||||
| Older (≥ 35years) | 40 | 19.05 | 7 | 21.21 | ||||
|
| Illiterate | 105 | 50.00 | 7 | 21.21 | 0.004 | ||
| Up to 5th standard (Primary school) | 20 | 9.52 | 3 | 9.09 | ||||
| 6th to 10th standard (Middle school) | 57 | 27.14 | 12 | 36.36 | ||||
| 11th to Graduation (High school & above) | 28 | 13.33 | 11 | 33.33 | ||||
| Occupation | Unemployed | 55 | 26.19 | 11 | 33.33 | - | ||
| Student | 6 | 2.86 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
| Laborer/Servants/Workers | 60 | 28.57 | 3 | 9.09 | ||||
| Transport workers | 6 | 2.86 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
| Hotel staff | 2 | 0.95 | 3 | 9.09 | ||||
| Small business | 75 | 35.71 | 11 | 33.33 | ||||
| Service | 6 | 2.86 | 5 | 15.15 | ||||
| Reason for coming to the service point | Collect condoms | 63 | 30.00 | 10 | 30.30 | 0.233 | ||
| For official work | 77 | 36.67 | 11 | 33.33 | ||||
| Drop-in-center/Meet other MSM | 31 | 14.76 | 9 | 27.27 | ||||
| Recreational purpose | 39 | 18.57 | 3 | 9.09 | ||||
|
| Double decker | 79 | 37.80 | 5 | 15.15 | 0.022 | ||
| Panthi | 18 | 8.61 | 2 | 6.06 | ||||
| Kothi | 112 | 53.59 | 26 | 78.79 | ||||
| Having sex with female in last 6 months | No | 178 | 84.76 | 29 | 87.88 | 0.795 | ||
| Yes | 32 | 15.24 | 4 | 12.12 | ||||
| Received or paid money for having sex with a man in last 12 months | No | 170 | 80.95 | 25 | 75.76 | - | ||
| Yes, paid money | 4 | 1.90 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
| Yes, received money | 32 | 15.24 | 3 | 9.09 | ||||
| Both | 4 | 1.90 | 5 | 15.15 | ||||
1 Boldface indicates characteristic with significantly different distribution (p<0.05) across the strata of HIV sero-status.
2 “-”refers to situations where valid p value could not be determined due to absence of adequate number of observation in individual categories
3 N: Total number of participants
4 n: Number of participants in each subcategories
5 Var: Variance.
Association of socio-demographic and behavioral characteristics with HIV sero-positivity among MSM attending HIV sentinel site in Nagaland, 2010–11 (N = 243).
| Categorical variable | Categories | Unadjusted | Adjusted Model 1 | Adjusted Model 2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | p value | OR | 95% CI | p value | OR | 95% CI | p value | ||
| Age group | Very young (< 25 years) | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Young (25–34 years) |
|
|
|
|
|
| 3.53 | 0.96,12.88 | 0.057 | |
| Older (≥35years) | 2.93 | 0.81,10.64 | 0.102 | 2.17 | 0.42,11.33 | 0.357 | 2.05 | 0.43,9.67 | 0.365 | |
| Literacy status | Illiterate | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Up to 5th standard (Primary school) | 2.25 | 0.54,9.44 | 0.268 | 3.14 | 0.61,16.08 | 0.169 | 2.91 | 0.59,14.40 | 0.190 | |
| 6th to 10th standard (Middle school) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 11th to Graduation (High school & above) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Occupation | Unemployed | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Student | - | - | - | |||||||
| Laborer/Servants/Workers |
|
|
| 0.36 | 0.08,1.57 | 0.173 | 0.36 | 0.08,1.58 | 0.176 | |
| Transport workers | - | - | - | |||||||
| Hotel staff |
|
|
| 2.14 | 0.19,23.71 | 0.535 | 2.51 | 0.27,23.50 | 0.421 | |
| Small business | 0.73 | 0.30,1.81 | 0.502 | 0.58 | 0.20,1.70 | 0.316 | 0.57 | 0.19,1.66 | 0.300 | |
| Service |
|
|
| 2.22 | 0.39,12.55 | 0.369 | 2.02 | 0.38,10.89 | 0.412 | |
| Years of stay in current place of residence | 0.97 | 0.93,1.01 | 0.164 | 1.00 | 0.94,1.06 | 0.870 | NA | |||
| Reason for coming to the service point | Collect condoms | Reference | Reference | NA | ||||||
| For official work | 0.90 | 0.36,2.26 | 0.822 | 0.69 | 0.22,2.20 | 0.530 | ||||
| Drop in center/Meet other MSM | 1.83 | 0.67,4.96 | 0.236 | 0.65 | 0.18,2.35 | 0.512 | ||||
| Recreational purpose | 0.49 | 0.13,1.87 | 0.293 | 0.82 | 0.17,4.01 | 0.801 | ||||
| Self-identified type (missing = 1) | Double decker | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Panthi | 1.76 | 0.32,9.78 | 0.521 | 2.48 | 0.29,21.52 | 0.596 | 2.24 | 0.34,14.86 | 0.405 | |
| Kothi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Days, since last sex with a man (missing = 1) |
|
|
| 0.67 | 0.43,1.04 | 0.072 | 0.68 | 0.45,1.02 | 0.059 | |
| Having sex with female in last 6 months | No | Reference | Reference | NA | ||||||
| Yes | 0.77 | 0.25,2.33 | 0.640 | 0.83 | 0.15,4.41 | 0.822 | ||||
| Received or paid money for having sex with a man in last 12 months | No | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Yes, paid money | - | - | - | |||||||
| Yes, received money | 0.64 | 0.18,2.24 | 0.482 | 0.67 | 0.15,2.95 | 0.596 | 0.72 | 0.17,3.09 | 0.660 | |
| Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1 Boldfaced values indicate association with HIV sero-positivity for which p value < 0.05 (our assumed α level)
2 “-”refers to situations where valid OR could not be determined due to absence of observation in any of the subcategories
3 N: Total number of participants
4 Adjusted Model 1: Multivariate logistic regression model including all variables in the model
5 Adjusted Model 2: Multivariate logistic regression model including only those variables in the model for which p value was <0.05 in bivariate analysis
6 OR: Odds Ratio
7 CI: Confidence Interval
8 NA refers to those variables which were not included in the Adjusted Model 2.