Literature DB >> 25688992

Growth-dependent photoinactivation kinetics of Enterococcus faecalis.

P A Maraccini1, D Wang, J S McClary, A B Boehm.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate how the growth stage of Enterococcus faecalis affects its photoinactivation in clear water. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Enterococcus faecalis were grown in batch cultures to four different growth stages or grown in chemostats set at four different dilution rates, then harvested and exposed to full spectrum or UVB-blocked simulated sunlight. Experiments were conducted in triplicate in clear water with no added sensitizers. Decay curves were shoulder-log linear and were generally not statistically different in experiments conducted under full spectrum light. Shoulders were longer and first order inactivation rates smaller when experiments were seeded with cells grown to stationary as compared to exponential phase, and for slower growing cells when experiments were done under UVB-blocked light. Chemostat-sourced bacteria generally showed less variability among replicates than batch-sourced cells.
CONCLUSIONS: The physiological state of cells and the method via which they are being generated may affect the photoinactivation experimental results. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Photoinactivation experiments conducted with exponential phase cells may overestimate the photoinactivation kinetics in the environment, particular if UVB-independent mechanisms predominate. Chemostat-sourced cells are likely to provide more consistent experimental results than batch-sourced cells.
© 2015 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacteria; batch culture; chemostat; enterococci; growth rate; photoinactivation; sunlight

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25688992     DOI: 10.1111/jam.12773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  4 in total

Review 1.  Sunlight-mediated inactivation of health-relevant microorganisms in water: a review of mechanisms and modeling approaches.

Authors:  Kara L Nelson; Alexandria B Boehm; Robert J Davies-Colley; Michael C Dodd; Tamar Kohn; Karl G Linden; Yuanyuan Liu; Peter A Maraccini; Kristopher McNeill; William A Mitch; Thanh H Nguyen; Kimberly M Parker; Roberto A Rodriguez; Lauren M Sassoubre; Andrea I Silverman; Krista R Wigginton; Richard G Zepp
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 4.238

2.  Transcriptional Response of Staphylococcus aureus to Sunlight in Oxic and Anoxic Conditions.

Authors:  Jill S McClary; Alexandria B Boehm
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Simple lysis of bacterial cells for DNA-based diagnostics using hydrophilic ionic liquids.

Authors:  Roland Martzy; Katharina Bica-Schröder; Ádám Márk Pálvölgyi; Claudia Kolm; Stefan Jakwerth; Alexander K T Kirschner; Regina Sommer; Rudolf Krska; Robert L Mach; Andreas H Farnleitner; Georg H Reischer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Modeling the Effect of Tylosin Phosphate on Macrolide-Resistant Enterococci in Feedlots and Reducing Resistance Transmission.

Authors:  Gregory Sean Stapleton; Casey L Cazer; Yrjö T Gröhn
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.171

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.