| Literature DB >> 25688975 |
Ramsey S Lewis1, Harry O Lopez1, Steve W Bowen1, Karen R Andres1, William T Steede1, Ralph E Dewey1.
Abstract
Motivation exists to develop tobacco cultivars with reduced nicotine content for the purpose of facilitating compliance with expected tobacco product regulations that could mandate the lowering of nicotine levels per se, or the reduction of carcinogenic alkaloid-derived tobacco specific nitrosamines (TSNAs). A berberine bridge enzyme-like (BBL) gene family was recently characterized for N. tabacum and found to catalyze one of the final steps in pyridine alkaloid synthesis for this species. Because this gene family acts downstream in the nicotine biosynthetic pathway, it may represent an attractive target for genetic strategies with the objective of reducing alkaloid content in field-grown tobacco. In this research, we produced transgenic doubled haploid lines of tobacco cultivar K326 carrying an RNAi construct designed to reduce expression of the BBL gene family. Field-grown transgenic lines carrying functional RNAi constructs exhibited average cured leaf nicotine levels of 0.684%, in comparison to 2.454% for the untransformed control. Since numerous barriers would need to be overcome to commercialize transgenic tobacco cultivars, we subsequently pursued a mutation breeding approach to identify EMS-induced mutations in the three most highly expressed isoforms of the BBL gene family. Field evaluation of individuals possessing different homozygous combinations of truncation mutations in BBLa, BBLb, and BBLc indicated that a range of alkaloid phenotypes could be produced, with the triple homozygous knockout genotype exhibiting greater than a 13-fold reduction in percent total alkaloids. The novel source of genetic variability described here may be useful in future tobacco breeding for varied alkaloid levels.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25688975 PMCID: PMC4331498 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Model for alkaloid biosynthesis in N. tabacum.
Known or suspected enzymatic steps are underlined: A622—isoflavone reductase-like protein; ADC—arginine decarboxlylase; BBL—berberine bridge enzyme-like; DAO—diamine oxidase; LDC—lysine decarboxlyase; MPO—N-methylputrescine oxidase; NDM—nicotine demethylase; ODC—ornithine decarboxlyase; PMT—putrescine methyltransferase; QPT—quinolinate phosphoribosyltransferase.
Means for measured characteristics for transgenic RNAi doubled haploid lines and associated checks.
| Root | Cured Leaf | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype | % Nico-Tine | % Nornicotine | % Anabasine | % Anatabine | % DMN | % Total Alkaloids | % Nicotine | % Nornicotine | % Anabasine | % Anatabine | % DMN | % Total Alkaloids | % Reducing Sugars | Yield (kg ha-1) | Cwt Value ($ cwt-1) | Cash Return ($ ha-1) | Grade Index |
| K326 BBL-RNAi DH25A | 0.4905 | 0.0239 | 0.0162 | 0.1011 | 0.0276 | 0.6592 | 2.4695 | 0.0542 | 0.0236 | 0.1205 | 0.0081 | 2.6758 | 12.97 | 2253 | 291.40 | 7223.03 | 77.9 |
| K326 BBL-RNAi DH35 | 0.7072 | 0.0282 | 0.0186 | 0.0726 | 0.0121 | 0.8387 | 2.6376 | 0.0521 | 0.0222 | 0.1462 | 0.0096 | 2.8677 | 13.66 | 2128 | 318.63 | 7103.49 | 84.2 |
| K326 BBL-RNAi DH43 | 0.5789 | 0.0261 | 0.0186 | 0.0611 | 0.0112 | 0.6959 | 2.6592 | 0.0532 | 0.0215 | 0.1297 | 0.0100 | 2.8735 | 13.73 | 2141 | 309.33 | 7522.17 | 82.3 |
| K326 BBL-RNAi DH25C | 0.5847 | 0.0256 | 0.0192 | 0.0490 | 0.0240 | 0.7025 | 2.4793 | 0.0450 | 0.0222 | 0.1152 | 0.0103 | 2.6720 | 15.04 | 2158 | 307.75 | 7342.08 | 81.5 |
| K326 BBL-RNAi DH22A | 0.1516 | 0.0354 | 0.0072 | 0.0176 | 0.0785 | 0.2903 | 0.5362 | 0.0784 | 0.0124 | 0.0143 | 0.0152 | 0.6565 | 13.71 | 1685 | 315.43 | 6439.64 | 83.3 |
| K326 BBL-RNAi DH32 | 0.0550 | 0.0615 | 0.0054 | 0.0048 | 0.1522 | 0.2790 | 0.4136 | 0.0890 | 0.0132 | 0.0073 | 0.0209 | 0.5440 | 12.67 | 1628 | 316.78 | 6551.81 | 83.7 |
| K326 BBL-RNAi DH16A | 0.0472 | 0.0367 | 0.0037 | 0.0051 | 0.0797 | 0.1723 | 0.4720 | 0.0789 | 0.0125 | 0.0079 | 0.0163 | 0.5876 | 13.79 | 1439 | 309.34 | 4774.54 | 80.1 |
| K326 BBL-RNAi DH19 | 0.0751 | 0.0480 | 0.0053 | 0.0079 | 0.1256 | 0.2620 | 1.0442 | 0.0864 | 0.0178 | 0.0358 | 0.0165 | 1.2007 | 12.91 | 1615 | 322.99 | 5800.20 | 85.5 |
| K326 BBL-RNAi DH303 | 0.1456 | 0.0662 | 0.0091 | 0.0156 | 0.1740 | 0.4106 | 0.9110 | 0.0859 | 0.0166 | 0.0233 | 0.0178 | 1.0547 | 14.08 | 1944 | 311.13 | 7166.99 | 83.3 |
| K326 BBL-RNAi DH16B | 0.0491 | 0.0421 | 0.0039 | 0.0055 | 0.0920 | 0.1926 | 0.7288 | 0.0781 | 0.0147 | 0.0283 | 0.0159 | 0.8658 | 13.32 | 1591 | 317.49 | 5831.29 | 84.0 |
| K326 | 0.7008 | 0.0303 | 0.0259 | 0.0739 | 0.0112 | 0.8420 | 2.4541 | 0.0559 | 0.0206 | 0.1188 | 0.0104 | 2.6598 | 14.71 | 2343 | 317.29 | 8254.99 | 83.9 |
| NC95 | 0.4149 | 0.0466 | 0.0157 | 0.0587 | 0.0725 | 0.6084 | 2.8870 | 0.0636 | 0.0303 | 0.2217 | 0.0099 | 3.2125 | 12.95 | 1722 | 306.66 | 6105.61 | 81.3 |
| LAFC53 | 0.3922 | 0.0101 | 0.0113 | 0.0603 | ND | 0.4739 | 0.2990 | 0.0128 | 0.0035 | 0.0201 | 0.0074 | 0.3428 | 8.55 | 1844 | 303.98 | 6519.67 | 79.4 |
| LSD (0.05) | 0.1748 | 0.0279 | 0.0061 | 0.0393 | 0.0724 | 0.1655 | 0.3998 | 0.0160 | 0.0032 | 0.0216 | 0.0039 | 0.4067 | 3.59 | 304 | 25.64 | 1098.66 | 6.4 |
a For convenience, genotypes are presented in three groups: four RNAi lines with non-significant changes in nicotine content, six RNAi lines with significant observed reductions in nicotine content, and three non-transgenic checks.
b % total alkaloids was calculated as: % total alkaloids = (% nicotine + % nornicotine + % anatabine + % anabasine + % DMN).
c ND = non-detectable
Position and effect of mutations identified in the BBLa gene in the mutated genetic background of tobacco line DH98–325–6.
| Mutant | Mutation | Position from ATG | Amino Acid Change | SIFT Prediction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | G/A | 450 | R150K | Tolerated |
| 507 | G/A | 267 | R89H | Tolerated |
| 2610 | G/A | 978 | E326K | Damaging |
| 2327 | G/A | 1194 | E398K | Damaging |
| 2665 | C/T | 1263 | A421V | Tolerated |
| 2977 | G/A | 351 | V117M | Damaging |
| 3118 | G/A | 663 | G221S | Tolerated |
| 1705 | G/A | 375 | D125K | Tolerated |
| 1265 | G/A | 255 | R85K | Tolerated |
| 1435 | G/A | 681 | W227Stop | N/A |
Total # of plants screened: 1,248
# missense mutations identified: 9
# truncation mutation mutations identified: 1
silent mutations not included
a Mutations predicted to be damaging had a SIFT score < 0.05.
Position and effect of mutations identified in the BBLb gene in the mutated genetic background of tobacco line DH98-325-6.
| Mutant | Mutation | Position from ATG | Amino Acid Change | SIFT Prediction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 875 | G/A | 554 | G185D | Damaging |
| 1347 | C/T | 578 | L190F | Tolerated |
| 2890 | G/A | 655 | A219N | Tolerated |
| 2704 | C/T | 589 | L197F | Damaging |
| 941 | C/T | 370 | P124S | Tolerated |
| 3061 | G/A | 529 | V177I | Tolerated |
| 675 | G/A | 438 | W146Stop | N/A |
Total # of plants screened: 1,344
# missense mutations identified: 6
# truncation mutation mutations identified: 1
silent mutations not included
a Mutations predicted to be damaging had a SIFT score < 0.05.
Position and effect of mutations identified in the BBLc gene in the mutated genetic background of tobacco line DH98-325-6.
| Mutant | Mutation | Position from ATG | Amino Acid Change | SIFT Prediction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 231 | G/A | 496 | A166T | Damaging |
| 86 | G/A | 524 | G175E | Damaging |
| 1263 | G/A | 664 | A222T | Damaging |
| 1763 | C/T | 746 | T249I | Damaging |
| 948 | C/T | 920 | P307L | Damaging |
| 1606 | G/A | 544 | G182S | Damaging |
| 1570 | G/A | 472 | A158T | Tolerated |
| 1080 | G/A | 325 | A109R | Damaging |
| 604 | C/T | 604 | L202F | Damaging |
| 478 | G/A | 563 | R188K | Damaging |
| 1107 | G/A | 527 | G176S | Damaging |
| 1771 | C/T | 448 | Q150Stop | N/A |
Total # of plants screened: 2,112
# missense mutations identified: 11
# truncation mutation mutations identified: 1
silent mutations not included
a Mutations predicted to be damaging had a SIFT score < 0.05.
Fig 2Alkaloid means for eight BBL knockout mutant combinations in a DH98–325–6 genetic background.
Numbers of plants characterized for each genotypic class are shown in parenthesis. Confidence intervals (95%) are provided.