Literature DB >> 25687746

Clinical course and prognostic relevance of antitachycardia pacing-terminated ventricular tachyarrhythmias in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients.

Thomas Kleemann1, Margit Strauss2, Kleopatra Kouraki2, Ralf Zahn2.   

Abstract

AIMS: In patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), ICD shocks due to ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) have been associated with an increased mortality. It is not known whether patients with antitachycardia pacing (ATP)-terminated VT/VF episodes have a similar worse outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical course and prognostic impact of ATP-terminated episodes on mortality in ICD patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 1398 consecutive patients of the prospective single-centre ICD-registry Ludwigshafen who underwent an ICD implantation between 1992 and 2008 for primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death were analysed. Patients treated with ATP were compared with patients with appropriate ICD shocks or patients without any appropriate ATP or ICD shock. During the median follow-up time of 6 years, 749 (54%) patients experienced 17 827 episodes of VT or VF which were terminated by ATP in 74% and by shock in 26% of patients. In approximately half (n = 321/749) of those patients with VT/VF, the first episode was terminated by ATP. In a multivariate analysis adjusted for different baseline confounding parameters, the occurrence of first ATP therapy was associated with a higher mortality rate [hazard ratio (HR) 2.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.02-3.35]. When excluding all patients with appropriate ICD shocks first ATP therapy remained associated with a worse prognosis (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.38-2.67).
CONCLUSIONS: In ICD patients, about three-fourths of ventricular arrhythmias are terminated by ATP. The occurrence of ATP-terminated episode is associated with an increased mortality rate. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antitachycardia pacing; Defibrillation; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25687746     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  9 in total

1.  The Significance of Shocks in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Recipients.

Authors:  Anthony Li; Amit Kaura; Nicholas Sunderland; Paramdeep S Dhillon; Paul A Scott
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-08

Review 2.  Therapy for ventricular arrhythmias in structural heart disease: a multifaceted challenge.

Authors:  Riccardo Proietti; Jacqueline Joza; Vidal Essebag
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Prognostic relevance of new onset arrhythmia and ICD shocks in primary prophylactic ICD patients.

Authors:  Thomas Kleemann; Margit Strauss; Kleopatra Kouraki; Nicolas Werner; Ralf Zahn
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 4.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in diabetics: efficacy and safety in patients at risk of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Muhammad Shahreyar; Vijayadershan Mupiddi; Indrajit Choudhuri; Jasbir Sra; Abdul Jamil Tajik; Arshad Jahangir
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2015-06-22

5.  Real-world evaluation of followup strategies after ICD therapies in patients with VT (REFINE-VT).

Authors:  Patrick Tran; Leeann Marshall; Ian Patchett; Handi Salim; Shamil Yusuf; Sandeep Panikker; Michael Kuehl; Faizel Osman; Prithwish Banerjee; Harpal Randeva; Tarvinder Dhanjal
Journal:  Br J Cardiol       Date:  2021-11-30

Review 6.  Electrophysiologic Considerations After Sudden Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Prakash Suryanarayana; Hyon-He K Garza; Jacob Klewer; Mathew D Hutchinson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2018

7.  Risk of subsequent ventricular arrhythmia is higher in primary prevention patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator than in secondary prevention patients.

Authors:  You Zhou; Shuang Zhao; Keping Chen; Wei Hua; Yangang Su; Silin Chen; Zhaoguang Liang; Wei Xu; Shu Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 8.  The modular cardiac rhythm management system: the EMPOWER leadless pacemaker and the EMBLEM subcutaneous ICD.

Authors:  F V Y Tjong; B E Koop
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-10-31

9.  Myocardial Minimal Damage After Rapid Ventricular Pacing - the prospective randomized multicentre MyDate-Trial.

Authors:  Verena Semmler; Clara Deutschmann; Bernhard Haller; Carsten Lennerz; Amir Brkic; Christian Grebmer; Patrick Blazek; Severin Weigand; Martin Karch; Sonia Busch; Christof Kolb
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.