Bridget E Weller1, Madelaine Faulkner, Otima Doyle, Stephanie S Daniel, David B Goldston. 1. Dr. Weller and Dr. Goldston are with the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (e-mail: bridget.weller@duke.edu ). Ms. Faulkner and Dr. Daniel are with the Center for Youth, Family, and Community Partnerships, University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Dr. Doyle is with Jane Addams College of Social Work, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A systematic literature review was conducted to assess the impact of patients' psychiatric hospitalizations on caregivers. METHODS: A systematic search of the Web of Knowledge, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE (PubMed) was conducted for peer-reviewed articles published in English before August 31, 2013. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies were included if they focused on the outcomes of caregivers of either adult or youth patients and presented data collected directly from caregivers of patients who had been psychiatrically hospitalized. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria. The review found that caregivers are heterogeneous in their reaction to patients' psychiatric hospitalization; however, many report distress. Many caregivers have reported experiencing stigma, disruptions in daily life, worse general medical health, economic strain, and changes in relationships after hospitalization. Negative reactions to the hospitalization may decrease over time, but distress can remain elevated compared with the general population. Nonetheless, many caregivers have also reported experiencing positive changes as a result of the hospitalization. The reaction of caregivers may be influenced by the severity of the patient's psychiatric problems as well as the caregiver's demographic characteristics and style of coping. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers experience a range of reactions to psychiatric hospitalizations. Providing caregivers with psychoeducation about their possible reaction to hospitalization and teaching them coping techniques may improve clinical outcomes for patients. Future research is needed to understand the heterogeneity in caregivers' reactions to patients' psychiatric hospitalization.
OBJECTIVE: A systematic literature review was conducted to assess the impact of patients' psychiatric hospitalizations on caregivers. METHODS: A systematic search of the Web of Knowledge, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE (PubMed) was conducted for peer-reviewed articles published in English before August 31, 2013. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies were included if they focused on the outcomes of caregivers of either adult or youth patients and presented data collected directly from caregivers of patients who had been psychiatrically hospitalized. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria. The review found that caregivers are heterogeneous in their reaction to patients' psychiatric hospitalization; however, many report distress. Many caregivers have reported experiencing stigma, disruptions in daily life, worse general medical health, economic strain, and changes in relationships after hospitalization. Negative reactions to the hospitalization may decrease over time, but distress can remain elevated compared with the general population. Nonetheless, many caregivers have also reported experiencing positive changes as a result of the hospitalization. The reaction of caregivers may be influenced by the severity of the patient's psychiatric problems as well as the caregiver's demographic characteristics and style of coping. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers experience a range of reactions to psychiatric hospitalizations. Providing caregivers with psychoeducation about their possible reaction to hospitalization and teaching them coping techniques may improve clinical outcomes for patients. Future research is needed to understand the heterogeneity in caregivers' reactions to patients' psychiatric hospitalization.
Authors: Delbert G Robinson; Nina R Schooler; Robert A Rosenheck; Haiqun Lin; Kyaw J Sint; Patricia Marcy; John M Kane Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Andrea Acevedo; Brian O Mullin; Ana M Progovac; Theodore L Caputi; J Michael McWilliams; Benjamin L Cook Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Emma S George; Ian Davidson; Aymen El Masri; Tanya Meade; Gregory S Kolt Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-06 Impact factor: 3.390