| Literature DB >> 25685688 |
M Kahle1, A Schäfer2, A Seelig3, J Schultheiß1, M Wu1, M Aichler4, J Leonhardt5, B Rathkolb6, J Rozman7, H Sarioglu8, S M Hauck2, M Ueffing2, E Wolf9, G Kastenmueller5, J Adamski10, A Walch4, M Hrabé de Angelis11, S Neschen11.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Excess lipid intake has been implicated in the pathophysiology of hepatosteatosis and hepatic insulin resistance. Lipids constitute approximately 50% of the cell membrane mass, define membrane properties, and create microenvironments for membrane-proteins. In this study we aimed to resolve temporal alterations in membrane metabolite and protein signatures during high-fat diet (HF)-mediated development of hepatic insulin resistance.Entities:
Keywords: 2-[14C]DG, 2-[1-14C]deoxyglucose; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AUC, area under the curve; B, basal; Basal, 17 h fasting; Clamp; DAG, diacylglycerol; Diabetes; EGP, endogenous (hepatic) glucose production; GIR, glucose infusion rate; HF, high-fat diet; Hepatosteatosis; IS, insulin-stimulated; LF, low-fat diet; Metabolomics; Mitochondria; NEFA, non-esterified fatty acids; PCaa, diacylglycerophosphocholine; PCae, glycerophosphocholine; Proteomics; ROS, reactive oxygen species; Ra, rate of appearance; Rd, rate of disappearance; Rg, glucose metabolic index; SM, sphingolipid; TAG, triacylglycerol; WAT, white adipose tissue; lysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholines
Year: 2014 PMID: 25685688 PMCID: PMC4314525 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2014.11.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Metab ISSN: 2212-8778 Impact factor: 7.422
Figure 4Liver inner and outer mitochondria-membrane protein profiles during developing HF-mediated hepatic insulin resistance. Via quantitative proteomics liver membrane protein profiles were assessed in random-fed male mice following exposure to HF or LF for 7, 14, or 21 days or following 7 days recovery on LF after 14 d HF-exposure (REC) compared to LF-fed littermates. Heatmaps depict the fold-change in the abundance of inner mitochondrial membrane-associated (A) respiratory chain complexes I-V and (B) solute carrier proteins, and outer mitochondrial membrane-associated (C) VDAC proteins. n = 6–7/group. * Significantly regulated proteins in HF, REC vs. LF group. HFd7: FDR < 20%, HFd14 and HFd21: FDR < 10%. Abbreviations: RC I–V, respiratory chain complexes I–V; SLC, solute carrier family 25 member, N.d. not detected.
Phenotypic parameters during developing HF-induced hepatic insulin resistance. Measurements were conducted in random-fed mice between 9 and 11 am. Prior to the start of the experiment animals in the LF (n = 28; pooled from 7, 14, or 21 days LF-fed mice) and HF groups (n = 10 each) were litter- and body mass-matched. Group sizes for mesenteric WAT mass (n = 18, 9, 5, and 5 for LF, HFd7, HFd14, and Hfd21, respectively), for plasma alanine aminotransferase and creatine kinase (n = 24, 6, 8, and 10 for LF, HFd7, HFd14, and Hfd21, respectively) and for plasma insulin (n = 8 for HFd7) were lower as not all parameters could be measured in each mouse. The table depicts the Rate of glucose disappearance (Rd) during the final 30 min of the glucose clamp (n = 9, 8, 9, and 9 for LF, HFd7, HFd14, and Hfd21, respectively). All data are given as means ± SEM (ANOVA, Bonferroni). ∗p < 0.05, p < 0.01∗∗, p < 0.001∗∗∗, p < 0.0001∗∗∗∗.
| Physiological parameters (random-fed) | LF | HF d7 | HF d14 | HF d21 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal body mass (g) | 34.14 ± 0.45 | 38.15 ± 0.76∗∗∗ | 38.46 ± 1.06∗∗∗ | 40.90 ± 0.81∗∗∗∗ |
| Body mass gain (terminal–initial. g) | −0.08 ± 0.24 | 2.98 ± 0.39∗∗∗∗ | 4.84 ± 0.40∗∗∗∗ | 6.88 ± 0.67∗∗∗∗ |
| Terminal whole body fat mass (g) | 9.30 ± 0.26 | 11.94 ± 0.49∗∗∗ | 12.12 ± 0.73∗∗∗∗ | 13.08 ± 0.46∗∗∗∗ |
| Body fat mass gain (terminal–initial. g) | 0.15 ± 0.19 | 1.62 ± 0.25∗∗∗ | 3.12 ± 0.41∗∗∗∗ | 3.63 ± 0.27∗∗∗∗ |
| Epididymal white adipose tissue mass (g) | 0.93 ± 0.04 | 1.50 ± 0.07∗∗∗∗ | 1.51 ± 0.10∗∗∗∗ | 1.66 ± 0.06∗∗∗∗ |
| Mesenteric white adipose tissue mass (g) | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 0.95 ± 0.04∗∗∗∗ | 0.97 ± 0.07∗∗∗∗ | 1.14 ± 0.06∗∗∗∗ |
| Plasma alanine aminotransferase (U/l) | 21.94 ± 1.65 | 31.45 ± 2.13* | 26.36 ± 1.88 | 28.92 ± 3.09 |
| Plasma creatine kinase (U/l) | 42.50 ± 2.50 | 29.00 ± 2.67∗ | 33.00 ± 2.51 | 36.20 ± 3.39 |
| Plasma glucose (mmol/l) | 11.49 ± 0.49 | 12.35 ± 0.59 | 14.52 ± 1.42 | 10.93 ± 0.60 |
| Plasma insulin (pmol/l) | 339.50 ± 76.47 | 867.60 ± 161.30 | 642.00 ± 167.1 | 976.90 ± 313.60∗ |
| Plasma triacylglycerol (mmol/l) | 4.07 ± 0.27 | 1.96 ± 0.13∗∗∗ | 2.62 ± 0.33∗ | 2.76 ± 0.35∗ |
| Plasma non-esterified fatty acids (mmol/l) | 0.71 ± 0.05 | 0.51 ± 0.05 | 0.60 ± 0.08 | 0.58 ± 0.06 |
| Euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamps (∼17-h fasting) | ||||
| Rd t90 [mmol/kg*min] | 1.92 ± 0.14 | 1.75 ± 0.04 | 1.47 ± 0.11∗ | 1.38 ± 0.08∗∗ |
| Rd t100 [mmol/kg*min] | 1.86 ± 0.09 | 1.74 ± 0.07 | 1.52 ± 0.10 | 1.37 ± 0.08∗∗ |
| Rd t110 [mmol/kg*min] | 1.83 ± 0.10 | 1.75 ± 0.09 | 1.50 ± 0.10 | 1.35 ± 0.09∗∗ |
| Rd t120 [mmol/kg*min] | 1.86 ± 0.07 | 1.76 ± 0.16 | 1.53 ± 0.10 | 1.40 ± 0.09∗ |
Figure 1Induction of HF-mediated hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance. Male mice were exposed to HF or LF (pooled) for 7, 14, or 21 days. The liver parameters (A) liver triacylglycerol concentrations, (B) terminal liver mass, and (C) liver ratio of methionine-SO and methionine (oxidative stress indicator) were assessed in random-fed mice (n = 6–24). Euglycemic–hyperinsulinemic clamps were performed in conscious, 17-h fasting (=basal condition, B) mice. (D) Plasma insulin concentrations in the B condition and in the clamp 'steady state' during insulin-stimulation (IS). The following parameters were calculated for 10 min periods in the clamp ‘steady state’. (E) Blood glucose concentration. (F) Plasma specific activity. (G) Glucose infusion rate. (H) Endogenous glucose appearance rates (EndoRa, B and IS), (I) Liver ratio of pAKT and total AKT protein (t-test comparing B and IS in each group, n = 4–15/group). Data are means ± SEM. n = 8–15/group. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 vs. LF or vs. B (ANOVA, Bonferroni).
Figure 2Liver lipid profiles during developing HF-mediated hepatic insulin resistance. Via t-metabolomics liver lipid profiles were assessed in random-fed male mice following exposure to HF or LF (pooled) for 7, 14, or 21 days. Heatmaps depict fold-change (log 2) of individual (A) short-, medium- and long-chain acyl-carnitine species or (B) selected phospholipid species in each HF-group. Compared to the LF-group, an increase in the HF-fed groups is indicated in yellow and a decrease in blue. (C) Total polyunsaturated (left, four species), monounsaturated (middle, 10 species) and saturated (right, 11 species) acyl-carnitine species. (D) Total membrane-associated diacylglycerols with two (left, four species) or one (middle, six species) incorporated unsaturated fatty acid or two incorporated saturated fatty acids (right, three species). (E) Total polyunsaturated (left, 31 species), monounsaturated (middle, seven species) and saturated (right, seven species) diacylglycerophosphocholines, (F) Total polyunsaturated (left, 19 species), monounsaturated (middle, seven species) and saturated (right, six species) glycerophosphocholines, and (G) Total polyunsaturated (left, three species), monounsaturated (middle, four species) and saturated (right, eight species) lysophosphatidylcholines. (H) Total hydroxylated (left, five species) or non-hydroxylated (right, seven species) sphingomyelins. Data are means ± SEM. n = 6–24/group, except diacylglycerols n = 6–9/group. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 vs. LF (ANOVA, Bonferroni). Abbreviations: PC aa diacylglycerophosphocholine (lecitine); PC ae, glycerophosphocholine (plasmalogen); lysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholine (lysolecithine); SM, sphingolipid.
Figure 3Liver membrane protein profiles during developing HF-mediated hepatic insulin resistance. Via quantitative proteomics liver membrane protein profiles were assessed in random-fed male mice following exposure to HF or LF for 7, 14, or 21 days. (A) VENNY diagram depicts the overlap of significantly regulated membrane-associated proteins comparing an HF versus the respective LF group. (B) Number of significantly up- and downregulated proteins. (C) Up- and (D) downregulated mitochondria-associated proteins were identified in an HF vs. the respective LF group and used to generate networks. n = 6–7/group. HFd7: FDR<20%, HFd14 and HFd21: FDR<10%.
Figure 5Ultrastructural and morphometric mitochondrial features in liver during development of HF-induced hepatic insulin resistance. EM-analyses were performed in liver sections obtained from random-fed male mice following exposure to LF or HF for 7 or 21 days. (A) Mitochondria in hepatocytes of the HFd7 group depicted minor ultrastructural changes (arrow middle panel, third row) whereas those of animals in the HFd21 group contained numerous atypical mitochondria with 'onion-like' structures (* right panel second and third row). Morphometric analyses of EM liver sections outline the (B) Percentages of periportal and perivenous hepatocyte volumina occupied by mitochondria and relative volumina of (C) small-sized mitochondria (defined as <0.02 μm3) related to total mitochondrial volume. Data are means ± SEM. n = 3–4/group (n = 1 represents mean of 10 analyzed electron micrographs/area and animal, ANOVA, Bonferroni).