Literature DB >> 25685009

Molecular identification of blood meal sources of ticks (Acari, Ixodidae) using cytochrome b gene as a genetic marker.

Ernieenor Faraliana Che Lah1, Salmah Yaakop2, Mariana Ahamad3, Shukor Md Nor2.   

Abstract

Blood meal analysis (BMA) from ticks allows for the identification of natural hosts of ticks (Acari: Ixodidae). The aim of this study is to identify the blood meal sources of field collected on-host ticks using PCR analysis. DNA of four genera of ticks was isolated and their cytochrome b (Cyt b) gene was amplified to identify host blood meals. A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on data of Cyt b sequences using Neighbor Joining (NJ) and Maximum Parsimony (MP) analysis using MEGA 5.05 for the clustering of hosts of tick species. Twenty out of 27 samples showed maximum similarity (99%) with GenBank sequences through a Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) while 7 samples only showed a similarity range of between 91-98%. The phylogenetic trees showed that the blood meal samples were derived from small rodents (Leopoldamyssabanus, Rattustiomanicus and Sundamysmuelleri), shrews (Tupaiaglis) and mammals (Tapirusindicus and Prionailurusbengalensis), supported by 82-88% bootstrap values. In this study, Cyt b gene as a molecular target produced reliable results and was very significant for the effective identification of ticks' blood meal. The assay can be used as a tool for identifying unknown blood meals of field collected on-host ticks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood meal; Cytochrome b; Ticks; Vector control; hosts

Year:  2015        PMID: 25685009      PMCID: PMC4319051          DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.478.8037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zookeys        ISSN: 1313-2970            Impact factor:   1.546


Introduction

The tick is a member of the class that belongs to the sub-class . It relies heavily on other animals as hosts to complete their life cycle (Mihalca et al. 2012). The tick is the second important vector after mosquitoes and is able to transmit disease in both man and livestock (Dalgic et al. 2010, Smith et al. 2010). Ticks may transmit a range of disease agents that are of medical and veterinary importance when taking a blood meal. Ticks that live in close proximity to humans, especially those on rodents, play a significant role in the transmission of several diseases (Chul-Min et al. 2006). Besides their role as hosts, rodents also serve as reservoirs of tick-borne pathogens (Paulauskas et al. 2009, Harrison et al. 2010, Paziewska et al. 2010). The close association between rodents and human is a risk factor for the transmission of diseases such as rickettsiosis, babesiosis and Lyme borreliosis (Killilea et al. 2008, Kia et al. 2009, Mihalca et al. 2012). Research on the identification of a natural host for ticks is valuable and is the main goal of a blood meal analysis (BMA). The analysis is a tool used to identify the hosts of blood feeding arthropods (Gariepy et al. 2012). Research into the composition of blood meals of arthropod vectors has been shown to provide evidence of link vector species with their specific hosts that can be used to determine possible disease reservoirs (Scott et al. 2012, Onder et al. 2013). Knowledge of vector host identification of ticks is critical in understanding the transmission cycle of vector-borne diseases (Christine 2011) and thus can provide important information to public health stakeholders for the development of more effective control strategies. Initially, attempts to identify blood meals of arthropods were made using serological techniques such as precipitin and latex agglutination tests (Walker and Davies 1971, Nevil and Anderson 1972). An improvement on the sensitivity of blood meal origin analysis was later studied using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) (Elias et al. 2010, Maria Stella et al. 2012). While those techniques continue to provide valuable and insightful data, the identification of many blood meal sources is limited to just the order or family level and species could only be identified when antibodies were available. The advert of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the availability of DNA sequence data of various vertebrates quickly led to a shift towards DNA-based identification (Mukabana et al. 2002, Humair et al. 2007, Kent 2009, Garros et al. 2011). The progressive development of molecular analysis has resulted in the use of markers that were originally designed to study phylogenetic relationships among vertebrates being applied to determine the blood meal origin of haematophagous arthropods (Boakye et al. 1999, Ninio et al. 2011). Tobolewski et al. (1992) reported that DNA techniques are much faster and more reliable to determine host species compared to other techniques that depend on antibodies. Humair et al. (2007) used 12S rDNA as a genetic marker for identification of blood meal sources in PageBreak ticks while Pichon et al. (2003) used a set of universal primers to amplify part of the vertebrate 18S rRNA gene followed by reverse line blot hybridization for host identification of . Understanding the origin of blood meals will give some information on the species involved in disease transmission cycles, as well as the disease risk posed to human. Analysis of blood meals of local ticks to determine their natural hosts is still poorly understood. There is a critical necessity to document information of potential hosts for local ticks as part of the nation’s preparedness for emerging and re-emerging infections. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify the blood meal sources of ticks in Peninsular Malaysia based on the cytochrome b (Cyt b) gene. The obtained Cyt b genes were then used to construct a phylogenetic tree for the clustering of hosts of tick species.

Materials and methods

Study area and ticks sampling

On-host ticks were collected from four different states of Peninsular Malaysia (Figure 1). The study sites were in Janda Baik, Pahang; Labu, Negeri Sembilan; Hulu Langat, Selangor; and Gunung Tebu, Terengganu. The collections were conducted from March to July 2012. The localities were chosen based on the records from available previous data of high numbers of tick infestation on small animals. The ecology for all localities was similar; consisting of mainly pristine tropical lowland rainforest, secondary growths, scrubs and riverine vegetation. One hundred wire traps were used to capture wild rodents and tree-shrews in each study site. Traps were placed on the ground and on tree branches along existing trails at approximately five meter intervals. Traps were baited with bananas, oil palm fruits, tapioca or potatoes and checked once daily for 5 consecutive days of trapping. Caught animals were placed in cloth bags and brought back to the Institute for Medical Research (IMR). The animals were anesthetized with chloroform before screening and the ticks were collected in the laboratory. The epidemiology data such as locality and ecology were recorded.
Figure 1.

Map of the study sites in Peninsular Malaysia: 1 Hulu Langat, Selangor 2 Labu, Negeri Sembilan 3 Janda Baik, Pahang 4 Gunung Tebu, Terengganu.

Map of the study sites in Peninsular Malaysia: 1 Hulu Langat, Selangor 2 Labu, Negeri Sembilan 3 Janda Baik, Pahang 4 Gunung Tebu, Terengganu.

Tick Morphological identification

The species of animals were identified by their morphological traits following Medway (1983), Francis (2008) and Payne et al. (2005). A total of 27 on-host ticks were collected either using sterile soft forceps or sharpened wooden applicator sticks. The ticks were then kept individually in vials containing 70% ethanol prior to identification using specific illustrated morphological taxonomic keys (Kohl 1957, Walker et al. 2003).

DNA extraction of blood meals in ticks

Prior to DNA extraction, each engorged tick was individually washed 3 times with sterile distilled water. Extraction of DNA using QIAamp Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) was perPageBreakformed according to the manufacturer’s protocols. DNA of ticks was extracted by adding 80 µl of PBS buffer and 100 µl of ATL buffer into the sample. The ticks were then macerated using sterile tips for 5 minutes before adding of 20 µl of proteinase K. The samples were incubated at 56 °C (6 hours) for complete lyses. The following steps were the same as those in the manufacture’s protocols. The DNA was then used for subsequent PCR.

PCR amplification of the mtDNA Cyt b gene

A portion of mitochondrial DNA, Cyt PageBreakb gene was amplified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) with a set of vertebrate-universal primers and reaction conditions as described by Kent and Norris (2005). The primers used were UNFOR403 and UNREV1025 (Table 1) that preferentially amplified a 623-bp region of the Cyt b gene from the mitochondrial DNA of vertebrates. The PCR reactions were conducted in 50 µl reaction tubes with the following reagents: 25 µl Taq PCR master 2X, 2.5 µl of 0.5 µM of each primer, 10 µl of nuclease free water and 10 µl of DNA template. The amplification program consists of a total of 35 cycles, denaturing at 94 °C for 3 min, annealing at 52 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, with an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min. PCR was carried out using an Eppendorf Master Cycler Personal machine (Eppendorf, Germany). For each PCR reaction, a negative control containing the DNA of unfed ticks and a positive control containing vertebrate DNA was included. The amplicons were visualized in 1.5% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide and viewed under an ultraviolet trans-illuminator (wavelength 254 nm).
Table 1.

List of primers used for PCR amplification

GenePrimer nameSequences (5’–3’)
Cyt bUNFOR4035'-TGA GGA CAA ATA TCA TTC TGA GG-3'
UNREV10255'-GGT TGT CCT CCA ATT CAT GTT A-3'
List of primers used for PCR amplification

Sequencing analysis and Alignment

The PCR product was excised with a sterile gel cutter and purified using 5 Prime PCR Agarose Gel Extract Mini Kit (Hamburg, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The purified product was then sent to the sequencing service company, Medigene Sdn. Bhd. in Petaling Jaya, Selangor. The sequencing was bi-directional for all specimens and the primer combination for this step was the same as that used in the PCR amplification. Sequencing results were exported as FASTA sequence files. The Cyt b gene sequences of samples were aligned using ClustalW multiple alignment of BioEdit (Thompson et al. 1994, Hall 2005).

BLAST analysis

The obtained sequences were then compared with available sequences in the GenBank database using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool search (NCBI website, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) for the identification of the host species. This approach was reported to be simple and robust for rapid comparison of query sequences to database sequences leading to species identification (Altschul et al. 1990, Mitler et al. 2010). The approach enabled the similarity of sequences to be measured depending on several criterias such as expected value, maximum identical, query coverage and maximum score.

Clustering analysis

The clustering analysis for all sequences of hosts was carried out by performing phylogenetic analysis using MEGA software (version 5.05). For distance analysis, a neighPageBreakbor-joining (NJ) tree was generated from a Kimura two-parameter distance matrix. Maximum-parsimony (MP) analysis was performed with Tree-Bisection-Reconnection (TBR) heuristic algorithm to reconstruct a character based phylogenetic tree. Internal branches of both trees were statistically supported by bootstrapping with 1,000 replications. In this study, (GenBank Accession no. AJ298599.1) was selected as an outgroup for Cyt b gene.

Results

A total of 27 engorged ticks collected from four different localities (Table 2) were amplified from Cyt b using PCR analysis. Six species of hosts comprising three rodents (, and ); a shrew, and two mammals identified as and , were identified. Mixed stages of on-host ticks were collected from the animals and identified into four genera: , , and .
Table 2.

Details of ticks samples used in analysis.

Code samplesTick speciesLocalityEcology
K1aAmblyomma testudinariumKrau Wildlife Reserved, PahangPristine tropical rainforest
K2aDermacentor sp.Krau Wildlife Reserved, PahangPristine tropical rainforest
K3cDermacentor sp.Krau Wildlife Reserved, PahangPristine tropical rainforest
K4bAmblyomma sp.Krau Wildlife Reserved, PahangPristine tropical rainforest
K5bAmblyomma sp.Krau Wildlife Reserved, PahangPristine tropical rainforest
SBN 01Ixodes granulatusLabu, Negeri SembilanScrubs
SBN12_1Dermacentor sp.Labu, Negeri SembilanScrubs
SBN23_1Ixodes granulatusLabu, Negeri SembilanScrubs
SBN 14Ixodes sp.Labu, Negeri SembilanScrubs
JBB01_1Dermacentor sp.Janda Baik, PahangRiverine vegetation
JBB03_1Haemaphysalis sp.Janda Baik, PahangRiverine vegetation
JBB03_2Haemaphysalis sp.Janda Baik, PahangRiverine vegetation
JBB03_3Haemaphysalis sp.Janda Baik, PahangRiverine vegetation
JBB03_4Haemaphysalis sp.Janda Baik, PahangRiverine vegetation
HL01Ixodes granulatusHulu Langat, SelangorPristine tropical rainforest
HL02Ixodes granulatusHulu Langat, SelangorPristine tropical rainforest
HL03_2Ixodes granulatusHulu Langat, SelangorPristine tropical rainforest
HL03Ixodes granulatusHulu Langat, SelangorPristine tropical rainforest
HL04_15Ixodes granulatusHulu Langat, SelangorPristine tropical rainforest
HL02_4Ixodes granulatusHulu Langat, SelangorPristine tropical rainforest
HL02_5Ixodes granulatusHulu Langat, SelangorPristine tropical rainforest
HL02_3Ixodes granulatusHulu Langat, SelangorPristine tropical rainforest
HL07Ixodes granulatusHulu Langat, SelangorPristine tropical rainforest
HL02_1Ixodes granulatusHulu Langat, SelangorPristine tropical rainforest
GT23_2Ixodes granulatusGunung Tebu, TerengganuSecondary growth
GT23_3Ixodes granulatusGunung Tebu, TerengganuSecondary growth
GT23_5Ixodes granulatusGunung Tebu, TerengganuSecondary growth
Details of ticks samples used in analysis.

PCR products and BLAST analysis

Vertebrate DNA was successfully amplified from 27 engorged ticks. The amplification of a single fragment encoding a 623 bp sequence of the Cyt b gene yielded the expected amplification products (Figure 2). Negative control (unfed ticks) yielded no PCR product implying that only host DNA patterns were detected in the amplifying specimens. All blood meals were identified down to species level. In general, the percent similarity between queried (unknown) sequences and the closest match in GenBank was between 91–100% (Table 3). Twenty out of 27 sequences (74.1%) showed maximum homology (99%) while 2 sequences (HL04_15 and SBN23_1) displayed 98% similarity with the online database. One sequence (HL03) showed maximum homology to with a 97% similarity while four sequences from Janda Baik matched to with a 91%. Some of the differences were probably due to intraspecific variation and in some cases, it could be due to poor sequence quality, particularly when unassigned nucleotides (n’s) were present in the sequence.
Figure 2.

Amplification of Cyt b gene produced 623 bp of PCR products from ticks species. Lane 1: unfed ticks (negative control); Lane 2: vertebrate DNA (positive control); Lanes 3–8: DNA of field-collected ticks ( sp., sp., sp., , sp., sp.,) and M1, M2: 100 bp DNA ladder (Bioron, Germany).

Table 3.

Blasting results against available sequences in GenBank.

Code samplesTick speciesHost species (morphological)% similarity with GenBank (species)
K1aAmblyomma testudinariumTapirus indicus99 (Tapirus indicus)
K2aDermacentor sp.Tapirus indicus99 (Tapirus indicus)
K3cDermacentor sp.Tapirus indicus99 (Tapirus indicus)
K4bAmblyomma sp.Tapirus indicus99 (Tapirus indicus)
K5bAmblyomma sp.Tapirus indicus99 (Tapirus indicus)
SBN 01Ixodes granulatusRattus tiomanicus99 (Rattus tiomanicus)
SBN12_1Dermacentor spRattus tiomanicus99 (Rattus tiomanicus)
SBN23_1Ixodes granulatusRattus tiomanicus98 (Rattus tiomanicus)
SBN 14Ixodes sp.Rattus tiomanicus99 (Prionailurus bengalensis)
JBB01_1Dermacentor sp.Tupaia glis99 (Tupaia glis)
JBB03_1Haemaphysalis sp.Sundamys muelleri91 (Sundamys muelleri)
JBB03_2Haemaphysalis sp.Sundamys muelleri91 (Sundamys muelleri)
JBB03_3Haemaphysalis sp.Sundamys muelleri91 (Sundamys muelleri)
JBB03_4Haemaphysalis sp.Sundamys muelleri91 (Sundamys muelleri)
HL01Ixodes granulatusLeopoldamys sabanus99 (Leopoldamys sabanus)
HL02Ixodes granulatusLeopoldamys sabanus99 (Leopoldamys sabanus)
HL03_2Ixodes granulatusLeopoldamys sabanus99 (Leopoldamys sabanus)
HL03Ixodes granulatusLeopoldamys sabanus97 (Leopoldamys sabanus)
HL04_15Ixodes granulatusSundamys muelleri98 (Sundamys muelleri)
HL02_4Ixodes granulatusLeopoldamys sabanus99 (Leopoldamys sabanus)
HL02_5Ixodes granulatusLeopoldamys sabanus99 (Leopoldamys sabanus)
HL02_3Ixodes granulatusLeopoldamys sabanus99 (Leopoldamys sabanus)
HL07Ixodes granulatusLeopoldamys sabanus99 (Leopoldamys sabanus)
HL02_1Ixodes granulatusLeopoldamys sabanus99 (Leopoldamys sabanus)
GT23_2Ixodes granulatusLeopoldamys sabanus99 (Leopoldamys sabanus)
GT23_3Ixodes granulatusLeopoldamys sabanus99 (Leopoldamys sabanus)
GT23_5Ixodes granulatusLeopoldamys sabanus99 (Leopoldamys sabanus)
Amplification of Cyt b gene produced 623 bp of PCR products from ticks species. Lane 1: unfed ticks (negative control); Lane 2: vertebrate DNA (positive control); Lanes 3–8: DNA of field-collected ticks ( sp., sp., sp., , sp., sp.,) and M1, M2: 100 bp DNA ladder (Bioron, Germany). Blasting results against available sequences in GenBank.

Clustering inferens

From the 27 aligned DNA sequences, a total of 575-bp portion of the Cyt PageBreakb gene was used for analysis. Out of 575 characters from Cyt b fragments, 252 variable sites were detected, among which 203 (35.3%) variable characters were parsimony-informative while 49 (8.5%) characters were parsimony-uninformative. Additionally, the conserved sites were constituted by 323 (56.1%) characters showing that Cyt b gene is a very conserved gene in the mtDNA. The mitochondrial Cyt PageBreakb gene sequences of host species were grouped into 2 major clades by NJ and MP analysis; one group of small rodents and another consisting of shrews and large mammals. The tree topology showed that all 27 host sequences examined fell into two distinct genetic lineages: Clade A (consists of , and ) and Clade B (consists of , and ). NJ tree topology revealed a distinction with 95% bootstrap value for Clade A but a lower bootstrap value of 85% for Clade B (Figure 3). Significant grouping of , and in each independent monophyletic subclade was obtained with a 100% bootstrap value. The NJ tree also showed the infestation of ticks on 3 species of different hosts that is , and while the ticks infested only on a single host, .
Figure 3.

Neighbor-joining tree constructed from 28 sequences (including one outgroup sequence) of the Cyt b gene. The numbers at the branches stand for bootstrap values 70% and above of 1000 replications. Genera of ticks represented by blue for sp., orange for sp., violet for sp. and green for sp.

Neighbor-joining tree constructed from 28 sequences (including one outgroup sequence) of the Cyt b gene. The numbers at the branches stand for bootstrap values 70% and above of 1000 replications. Genera of ticks represented by blue for sp., orange for sp., violet for sp. and green for sp. Seven parsimonious trees were produced by the MP analysis using equally weighted TBR. The best tree had 497 steps (Figure 4) with a consistency index of 0.67114, a homoplasy index of 0.70422 and a retention index of 0.88804. The MP tree is concordant with the NJ tree as it shares a relatively similar tree topology of phylogenetic relationships. Two distinct monophyletic clades are clearly shown on the phylogenetic tree of potential hosts of ticks. These small rodents and large mammals were fully supported by high bootstrap values of 82% and 88%, respectively.
Figure 4.

Maximum parsimony tree constructed from 28 sequences (including one outgroup sequence) of the Cyt b gene. The numbers at the branches stand for bootstrap values 70% and above of 1000 replications. Genera of ticks represented by blue for sp., orange for sp., violet for sp. and green for sp.

Maximum parsimony tree constructed from 28 sequences (including one outgroup sequence) of the Cyt b gene. The numbers at the branches stand for bootstrap values 70% and above of 1000 replications. Genera of ticks represented by blue for sp., orange for sp., violet for sp. and green for sp.

Discussion

The study produced the first analysis of host identification for local ticks that identifies animals to the species level by detecting their Cyt PageBreakb gene in engorged on-host ticks. The usefulness of blood meal analysis in determining the identity of the host species by PCR has been demonstrated by a recent study (Ernieenor et al. 2012). The identification of the vertebrate hosts using molecular detection of the Cyt b gene displayed an exact match and this adds more confidence to the use of this analysis. In the present case, all the samples were conclusively identified to species level. The results of this study also indicated that local ticks are not host specific because they have a wide host range from small rodents to mammals. In this study, the Cyt b gene was successfully proven as a discriminatory molecular marker for the identification of host DNA in ticks. Cyt b was selected as the target gene because of its track record in blood meal identification assays and its utilization in developing mammalian phylogeny (Kirstein and Gray 1996, Pierce et al. 2009). Moreover, the Cyt b gene has been widely used to make reliable blood meal identification of arthropods inclusive ticks due to its high copy numbers as mitochondrial genes and sufficient genetic variations at the primary sequence level among vertebrate taxa (Ngo and Kramer 2003, Maleki-Ravasan et al. 2009). The most significant aspect of the method is its sensitivity to detect minuscule amounts of host DNA. In this study, host DNA could be detected in the 27 engorged ticks as determined by electrophoresis on agarose gel. The successful identification presumably because ticks sample was in the freshly engorged state, sufficient intact host DNA was present in the midgut. Adult stage of the ticks was used in this analysis may also eventually give positive identification of host. Cadenas et al. (2007) had similar complications, reporting that the ability to detect host DNA in adult ticks was significantly higher than in nymphs, probably due to the higher quantity of blood ingested by ticks during their previous bloodmeals as nymphs and larvae. This study shows that may probably pose greater problems than most other ticks because of its capability to infest various hosts such as rodents and larger animals. This finding is in accordance with studies that reported as the most notable tick infesting rodents (Mariana et al. 2008, Nadchatram 2008, Paulauskas et al. 2011, Mihalca et al. 2012, Mihalca and Sandor 2013). The species is a common acarine ectoparasite of rodents in Malaysia with wide distribution extends from Southeast Asia to eastern India and China (Nadchatram 2008). are the most common genus of ticks that feed on humans (Briciu et al. 2011) may also infest rodents that can serve as reservoir hosts for human diseases (Marchette 1966, Schorn et al. 2011). Several genera of ticks found feeding on one individual of host is a common feeding behavior in wild rodents (Mariana et al. 2005). The sharing of host by different genera or species of ticks is important mainly for the bridging of microbial pathogens through reservoir hosts (Bursali et al. 2010). The ecological importance of reservoir hosts is greater if the animals are also common hosts for competent ticks (Mihalca et al. 2012). An interesting finding was observed in this study where ticks (SBN 14) collected from gave a high similarity (99%) of blood meal to . It was probably due to incomplete or an interruption of feeding that occurred before the tick attached itself to another host (Allan et al. 2010). Another possible reason is the short duration of feeding on the first host before the partially fed ticks dropped off-host and attached to a new host () for a blood meal. A similar finding known as co-feeding transmission was also reported by Gern and Rais (1996) and Shih and Spielman (1993). The finding of PageBreak as one of the hosts for ticks (K1a, K4b and K5b) was rare because the ticks were generally host specific on wild reptiles and amphibians (Pandit et al. 2011). That appears to indicate that the population of reptiles and amphibians surrounding the locality are scarcely found and the ticks have no choice to feed on any other animals available in the area. Rodents such as , and were also reported as alternative hosts for ticks (Nadchatram et al. 1966, Paramasvaran et al. 2009). Partial Cyt b mtDNA gene sequences used in this study seems to be effective in identifying the phylogenetic relationships between ticks and their hosts. This is because both NJ and MP tree topology showed very clear distinction between groups of small rodents, shrews and large mammals with a highly supported monophyletic clade. In small rodents, the node is solved in the NJ and MP tree as two monophyletic clades, representing the species of , and . The tree topologies also show that formed their own distinct monophyletic clade separated from other larger mammals which consists of and . The information obtained has further corroborated the morphological identification and classification of which comes under the group of shrews. Such knowledge gained through host preference studies is essential to understanding the relationship of host and vector and their roles in the enzootic transmission cycle (Ngo and Kramer 2003). Therefore, analyses of ticks bloodmeals will create a better understanding of epidemiologically important vectors-their hosts that can be lead to the design of more effective control strategies (Kirstein and Gray 1996). Of particular interest was the high numbers of ticks infesting small rodents compared to larger mammals. This finding is in agreeable with a previous study which reported that the abundance of small rodents compensate even if the intensity of tick parasitism on them is smaller than the larger hosts (Randolph 2004). The capability of rodents as host for ticks has been extensively investigated until to date mainly because they can be easily captured in large numbers and are easier to handle or maintain in the laboratory (Gern and Humair 2002). This is in line with our catch which was represented mainly by rodents as they were abundantly found in all localities. For further studies, it is recommended that ticks are collected from sites frequently visited by animals including the wallows, wildlife main trails and river banks to include a more diverse group of animals in order to generate better results (Pichon et al. 2005, Pierce et al 2009). A bigger sample size with heterogeneous host species collection needs to be examined in parallel with different molecular markers to enable researchers to draw reliable conclusions and provide alternative views on the relationship between ticks and their natural hosts in Malaysia.

Conclusion

The PCR direct sequencing system using vertebrate Cyt PageBreakb gene is a potential screening tool for the identification of ticks’ blood meal. The Cyt b gene was selected for this study based on their higher nucleotide variations for the effective identification of hosts. Blood meal identification of field collected ticks by molecular methods offer a direct and efficient approach for understanding the contributions of both competent and incompetent hosts for the transmission dynamics of tick-borne diseases. Furthermore, this valuable information can confirm a strong association between hard ticks and hosts (especially rodents) and this will assist public health officials with efforts to outline an effective tick-borne diseases control program.
  43 in total

1.  Detection and identification of mammalian DNA from the gut of museum specimens of ticks.

Authors:  J Tobolewski; M J Kaliszewski; R K Colwell; J H Oliver
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  Reverse line blot probe design and polymerase chain reaction optimization for bloodmeal analysis of ticks from the eastern United States.

Authors:  M C Scott; J R Harmon; J I Tsao; C J Jones; G J Hickling
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.278

3.  Efficient transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi between cofeeding Ixodes ricinus ticks (Acari: Ixodidae).

Authors:  L Gern; O Rais
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.278

4.  Ixodid ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) infesting humans in Tokat Province of Turkey: species diversity and seasonal activity.

Authors:  Ahmet Bursali; Saban Tekin; Mehmet Orhan; Adem Keskin; Muhlis Ozkan
Journal:  J Vector Ecol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Detection and identification of pathogens and host DNA in unfed host-seeking Ixodes ricinus L. (Acari: Ixodidae).

Authors:  Bruno Pichon; Damian Egan; Mark Rogers; Jeremy Gray
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.278

6.  Utilisation of rodent species by larvae and nymphs of hard ticks (Ixodidae) in two habitats in NE Poland.

Authors:  Anna Paziewska; Lucyna Zwolińska; Philip D Harris; Anna Bajer; Edward Siński
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.132

7.  A preliminary survey of the epidemiology of bluetongue in Kenya.

Authors:  A R Walker; F G Davies
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1971-03

8.  Blood Meal Identification in Field-Captured Sand flies: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and ELISA Assays.

Authors:  N Maleki-Ravasan; Ma Oshaghi; E Javadian; Y Rassi; J Sadraei; F Mohtarami
Journal:  Iran J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2009-06-30

9.  Occurrence of Babesia spp., Rickettsia spp. and Bartonella spp. in Ixodes ricinus in Bavarian public parks, Germany.

Authors:  Sabine Schorn; Kurt Pfister; Holger Reulen; Monia Mahling; Cornelia Silaghi
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Tick parasites of rodents in Romania: host preferences, community structure and geographical distribution.

Authors:  Andrei D Mihalca; Mirabela O Dumitrache; Attila D Sándor; Cristian Magdaş; Miruna Oltean; Adriana Györke; Ioana A Matei; Angela Ionică; Gianluca D'Amico; Vasile Cozma; Călin M Gherman
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.876

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pitfalls in Tick and Tick-Borne Pathogens Research, Some Recommendations and a Call for Data Sharing.

Authors:  Agustín Estrada-Peña; Aitor Cevidanes; Hein Sprong; Javier Millán
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-06-07

2.  Unbiased Characterization of Anopheles Mosquito Blood Meals by Targeted High-Throughput Sequencing.

Authors:  Kyle Logue; John Bosco Keven; Matthew V Cannon; Lisa Reimer; Peter Siba; Edward D Walker; Peter A Zimmerman; David Serre
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-03-10

3.  Endosymbiont interference and microbial diversity of the Pacific coast tick, Dermacentor occidentalis, in San Diego County, California.

Authors:  Nikos Gurfield; Saran Grewal; Lynnie S Cua; Pedro J Torres; Scott T Kelley
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Updated distribution and host records for the argasid tick Ornithodoros (Pavlovskyella) zumpti: A potential vector of African swine fever virus in South Africa.

Authors:  Anthony F Craig; Livio Heath; Jan E Crafford; Juergen A Richt; Robert Swanepoel
Journal:  Onderstepoort J Vet Res       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 1.792

5.  Detection of African Swine Fever Virus in Ornithodoros Tick Species Associated with Indigenous and Extralimital Warthog Populations in South Africa.

Authors:  Anthony F Craig; Mathilde L Schade-Weskott; Thapelo Rametse; Livio Heath; Gideon J P Kriel; Lin-Mari de Klerk-Lorist; Louis van Schalkwyk; Jessie D Trujillo; Jan E Crafford; Juergen A Richt; Robert Swanepoel
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 5.818

Review 6.  Flavivirus Persistence in Wildlife Populations.

Authors:  Maria Raisa Blahove; James Richard Carter
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 5.048

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.