Hao Chen1, Dan-Ping Shen1, Zi-Zhen Zhang1, Jia-Hua Liu1, Yan-Ying Shen1, Xing-Zhi Ni1. 1. Hao Chen, Dan-Ping Shen, Zi-Zhen Zhang, Jia-Hua Liu, Xing-Zhi Ni, Department of General Surgery, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4) protein expression in Chinese patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC) and the association with clinicopathological characteristics and survival. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-five GC patients who underwent curative surgical procedures were enrolled in this study. The protein expression of FGFR4 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) GC tissues was determined by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. Patient clinicopathological data and survival information were also collected and χ(2) statistical analysis was performed to analyze FGFR4 protein expression in the subgroups with differing clinicopathological characteristics including; gender, age, tumor location, differentiation, tumor-node-metastasis stage, macroscopic type, depth of invasion, lymph node metastases, distant metastasis, neural invasion and vascular invasion. Furthermore, some common molecular markers of GC in our cancer center, including p53, p27, topoisomerase IIα (Topo IIα) were also determined by IHC and their association with FGFR4 protein expression evaluated. The probability of survival for different subgroups with different clinicopathological characteristics was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and survival curves plotted using the log rank test. RESULTS: Seventy seven cases (44%) were found to have high expression of FGFR4 protein. Significantly different FGFR4 expression was observed between gastric cancers with differing expression of Topo IIα (log rank χ(2) = 9.4760, P = 0.0236). No significant differences were observed between subgroups defined by any of the other clinicopathological characteristics. The median survival time of the FGFR4 high expression (77 cases) and low expression groups (98 cases) was 27 mo and 39 mo, respectively. The five-year survival rates and median survival times of gastric cancers with high FGFR4 expression were worse than those with low expression (30.8% vs 39.2%, 27 mo vs 39 mo), respectively, however, no significant difference was observed in survival time (log rank χ(2) = 1.0477, P = 0.3060). Survival analysis revealed that high expression of FGFR4 was a predictor of poor outcome in GC patients if the tumor was small (less than or equal to 3 cm in size) (log rank χ(2) = 5.5033, P = 0.0190), well differentiated (log rank χ(2) = 7.9757, P = 0.0047), and of T1 or T2 stage invasion depth (log rank χ(2) = 4.8827, P = 0.0271). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that high tumor expression of FGFR4 protein is not an independent risk factor for GC cancer initiation, but is a useful prognostic marker for GC patients when the tumor is relatively small, well differentiated, or in the early stages of invasion.
AIM: To investigate fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4) protein expression in Chinese patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC) and the association with clinicopathological characteristics and survival. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-five GC patients who underwent curative surgical procedures were enrolled in this study. The protein expression of FGFR4 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) GC tissues was determined by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. Patient clinicopathological data and survival information were also collected and χ(2) statistical analysis was performed to analyze FGFR4 protein expression in the subgroups with differing clinicopathological characteristics including; gender, age, tumor location, differentiation, tumor-node-metastasis stage, macroscopic type, depth of invasion, lymph node metastases, distant metastasis, neural invasion and vascular invasion. Furthermore, some common molecular markers of GC in our cancer center, including p53, p27, topoisomerase IIα (Topo IIα) were also determined by IHC and their association with FGFR4 protein expression evaluated. The probability of survival for different subgroups with different clinicopathological characteristics was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and survival curves plotted using the log rank test. RESULTS: Seventy seven cases (44%) were found to have high expression of FGFR4 protein. Significantly different FGFR4 expression was observed between gastric cancers with differing expression of Topo IIα (log rank χ(2) = 9.4760, P = 0.0236). No significant differences were observed between subgroups defined by any of the other clinicopathological characteristics. The median survival time of the FGFR4 high expression (77 cases) and low expression groups (98 cases) was 27 mo and 39 mo, respectively. The five-year survival rates and median survival times of gastric cancers with high FGFR4 expression were worse than those with low expression (30.8% vs 39.2%, 27 mo vs 39 mo), respectively, however, no significant difference was observed in survival time (log rank χ(2) = 1.0477, P = 0.3060). Survival analysis revealed that high expression of FGFR4 was a predictor of poor outcome in GC patients if the tumor was small (less than or equal to 3 cm in size) (log rank χ(2) = 5.5033, P = 0.0190), well differentiated (log rank χ(2) = 7.9757, P = 0.0047), and of T1 or T2 stage invasion depth (log rank χ(2) = 4.8827, P = 0.0271). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that high tumor expression of FGFR4 protein is not an independent risk factor for GC cancer initiation, but is a useful prognostic marker for GC patients when the tumor is relatively small, well differentiated, or in the early stages of invasion.
Authors: Nami Sugiyama; Markku Varjosalo; Pipsa Meller; Jouko Lohi; Marko Hyytiäinen; Sami Kilpinen; Olli Kallioniemi; Signe Ingvarsen; Lars H Engelholm; Jussi Taipale; Kari Alitalo; Jorma Keski-Oja; Kaisa Lehti Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Johan L Dikken; Edwin P M Jansen; Annemieke Cats; Berdine Bakker; Henk H Hartgrink; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Henk Boot; Hein Putter; Koen C M J Peeters; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Marcel Verheij Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anna M Azarova; Yi Lisa Lyu; Chao-Po Lin; Yuan-Chin Tsai; Johnson Yiu-Nam Lau; James C Wang; Leroy F Liu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-06-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Andreas Roidl; Hans-Jürgen Berger; Sushil Kumar; Johannes Bange; Pjotr Knyazev; Axel Ullrich Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-02-24 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: B Gowardhan; D A Douglas; M E Mathers; A B McKie; S R C McCracken; C N Robson; H Y Leung Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2005-01-31 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Mohamed A Ahmed; Edgar Selzer; Wolfgang Dörr; Gerd Jomrich; Felix Harpain; Gerd R Silberhumer; Leonhard Müllauer; Klaus Holzmann; Bettina Grasl-Kraupp; Michael Grusch; Walter Berger; Brigitte Marian Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-10-25