Literature DB >> 25684625

Sustained Modeling-Based Bone Formation During Adulthood in Cynomolgus Monkeys May Contribute to Continuous BMD Gains With Denosumab.

Michael S Ominsky1, Cesar Libanati2, Qing-Tian Niu1, Rogely W Boyce3, Paul J Kostenuik1, Rachel B Wagman2, Roland Baron4,5, David W Dempster6,7.   

Abstract

Denosumab (DMAb) administration to postmenopausal women with osteoporosis is associated with continued bone mineral density (BMD) increases and low fracture incidence through 8 years, despite persistently reduced bone turnover markers and limited fluorochrome labeling in iliac crest bone biopsies. BMD increases were hypothesized to result from additional accrual of bone matrix via modeling-based bone formation-a hypothesis that was tested by examining fluorochrome labeling patterns in sections from ovariectomized (OVX) cynomolgus monkeys (cynos) treated with DMAb for 16 months. Mature OVX or Sham cynos were treated monthly with vehicle for 16 months, whereas other OVX cynos received monthly 25 or 50 mg/kg DMAb. DMAb groups exhibited very low serum bone resorption and formation biomarkers and near-absent fluorochrome labeling in proximal femur cancellous bone. Despite these reductions, femoral neck dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) BMD continued to rise in DMAb-treated cynos, from a 4.6% increase at month 6 to 9.8% above baseline at month 16. Further examination of cortical bone in the proximal femur demonstrated consistent and prominent labeling on the superior endocortex and the inferior periosteal surface, typically containing multiple superimposed labels from month 6 to 16 over smooth cement lines, consistent with continuous modeling-based bone formation. These findings were evident in all groups. Quantitative analysis at another modeling site, the ninth rib, demonstrated that DMAb did not alter the surface extent of modeling-based labels, or the cortical area bound by them, relative to OVX controls, while significantly reducing remodeling-based bone formation and eroded surface. This conservation of modeling-based formation occurred concomitantly with increased femoral neck strength and, when coupled with a reduction in remodeling-based bone loss, is likely to contribute to increases in bone mass with DMAb treatment. Thus, this study provides preclinical evidence for a potential mechanism that could contribute to the clinical observations of continued BMD increases and low fracture rates with long-term DMAb administration.
© 2015 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANTIRESORPTIVES; BONE HISTOMORPHOMETRY; BONE MODELING AND REMODELING; OSTEOPOROSIS; PRECLINICAL STUDIES

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25684625     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  24 in total

Review 1.  Osteogenesis imperfecta: advancements in genetics and treatment.

Authors:  Vittoria Rossi; Brendan Lee; Ronit Marom
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.856

2.  Variability of Denosumab densitometric response in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Laroche; C Baradat; A Ruyssen-Witrand; Y Degboe
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Osteoporosis: Romosozumab to rebuild the foundations of bone strength.

Authors:  Serge L Ferrari
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Continuous treatment with odanacatib for up to 8 years in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: a phase 2 study.

Authors:  R Rizzoli; C-L Benhamou; J Halse; P D Miller; I R Reid; J A Rodríguez Portales; C DaSilva; R Kroon; N Verbruggen; A T Leung; D Gurner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Denosumab increases sublesional bone mass in osteoporotic individuals with recent spinal cord injury.

Authors:  L Gifre; J Vidal; J L Carrasco; A Muxi; E Portell; A Monegal; N Guañabens; P Peris
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Differential Effects of Teriparatide and Denosumab on Intact PTH and Bone Formation Indices: AVA Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  David W Dempster; Hua Zhou; Robert R Recker; Jacques P Brown; Christopher P Recknor; E Michael Lewiecki; Paul D Miller; Sudhaker D Rao; David L Kendler; Robert Lindsay; John H Krege; Jahangir Alam; Kathleen A Taylor; Boris Janos; Valerie A Ruff
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Comparison of the effects of denosumab between a native vitamin D combination and an active vitamin D combination in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Kosuke Ebina; Masafumi Kashii; Makoto Hirao; Jun Hashimoto; Takaaki Noguchi; Kota Koizumi; Kazuma Kitaguchi; Hozo Matsuoka; Toru Iwahashi; Yasunori Tsukamoto; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  The effects of switching daily teriparatide to oral bisphosphonates or denosumab in patients with primary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Kosuke Ebina; Jun Hashimoto; Masafumi Kashii; Makoto Hirao; Shoichi Kaneshiro; Takaaki Noguchi; Yasunori Tsukamoto; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Assessment of the effects of switching oral bisphosphonates to denosumab or daily teriparatide in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Kosuke Ebina; Makoto Hirao; Jun Hashimoto; Keisuke Hagihara; Masafumi Kashii; Kazuma Kitaguchi; Hozo Matsuoka; Toru Iwahashi; Ryota Chijimatsu; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Cortical bone mineral density is increased by the cathepsin K inhibitor ONO-5334, which leads to a robust increase in bone strength: results from a 16-month study in ovariectomised cynomolgus monkeys.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yamada; Yasuo Ochi; Hiroshi Mori; Satoshi Nishikawa; Yasuaki Hashimoto; Makoto Tanaka; Steve Deacon; Kazuhito Kawabata
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.