Literature DB >> 25684343

Stand-alone minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: multicenter clinical outcomes.

Amir Ahmadian1, Konrad Bach2, Bryan Bolinger3, Gregory M Malham4, David O Okonkwo3, Adam S Kanter3, Juan S Uribe1.   

Abstract

Stand-alone minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion (MIS-LIF), without posterior instrumentation, is feasible because the technique does not necessitate the disruption of the stabilizing elements. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent stand-alone lateral interbody fusion. A multicenter chart review was conducted to identify patients who underwent stand-alone MIS-LIF between 2008 and 2012. Patients were classified by spinal pathology (degenerative disc disease [DDD], spondylolisthesis [SL] and adult degenerative scoliosis [ADS]). Routine clinical follow-up was scheduled at 3, 6, and12 months. Outcome measures included hospital length of stay, fusion rates, neurologic complications, integrity of construct and clinical outcome questionnaires (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]). A total of 59 patients met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 60 years (range 31-86 years). Spinal pathologies treated were DDD in 37 (63%), SL in four (7%) and ADS in 18 (30%) patients. Fusion rate was 93% of patients (95% of levels) at 12 months. Two patients required re-operation. Mean hospital stay and follow-up were 3.3days (range 1-10) and 14.6 months, respectively. The mean preoperative VAS and ODI were 69.1 and 51.8, respectively. VAS improved to 37.8 (p<0.0005). ODI improved to 31.8 (p<0.0005). Seventy percent of patients had grade 0 subsidence while 30% had grade I and grade II subsidence. Stand-alone MIS-LIF is viable option in a carefully selected patient population for both single and multilevel disease and shows significant improvement in health related quality of life.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult spinal deformity; Degenerative disc disease; Degenerative scoliosis; Interbody fusion; Minimally invasive; Spondylolisthesis; Stand-alone

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25684343     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.08.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  22 in total

Review 1.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Lumbar interbody fusion: recent advances in surgical techniques and bone healing strategies.

Authors:  Bin Meng; Joshua Bunch; Douglas Burton; Jinxi Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Outcomes and Complications.

Authors:  Stephan N Salzmann; Jennifer Shue; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

Review 4.  An evaluation of biomaterials and osteobiologics for arthrodesis achievement in spine surgery.

Authors:  Joon S Yoo; Junyoung Ahn; Dillon S Patel; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Thomas S Brundage; Kern Singh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 5.  Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gun Keorochana; Kitipong Setrkraising; Patarawan Woratanarat; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Minimally invasive surgery in adult degenerative scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of decompression, anterior/lateral and posterior lumbar approaches.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Ya Ruth Huo; Jarred A Hogan; Joshua Xu; Alexander Dunn; Samuel K Cho; Ralph J Mobbs; Patrick McKenna; Trichy Rajagopal; Farhaan Altaf
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06

7.  Anterior and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Supplemental Interspinous Process Fixation: Outcomes from a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Authors:  Ripul Panchal; Ryan Denhaese; Clint Hill; K Brandon Strenge; Alexandre DE Moura; Peter Passias; Paul Arnold; Andrew Cappuccino; M David Dennis; Andy Kranenburg; Brieta Ventimiglia; Kim Martin; Chris Ferry; Sarah Martineck; Camille Moore; Kee Kim
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

Review 8.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: What Is the Evidence of Indirect Neural Decompression? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Matteo Formica; Emanuele Quarto; Andrea Zanirato; Lorenzo Mosconi; Davide Vallerga; Irene Zotta; Maddalena Lontaro Baracchini; Carlo Formica; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-03-20

9.  Biomechanical comparison of multilevel lateral interbody fusion with and without supplementary instrumentation: a three-dimensional finite element study.

Authors:  Xilin Liu; Jun Ma; Paul Park; Xiaodong Huang; Ning Xie; Xiaojian Ye
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and in Situ Screw Fixation for Rostral Adjacent Segment Stenosis of the Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Young Hoon Choi; Shin Won Kwon; Jung Hyeon Moon; Chi Heon Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Sung Bae Park; Won Heo
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2017-10-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.