Literature DB >> 25683790

Virus-based nanomaterials as positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance contrast agents: from technology development to translational medicine.

Sourabh Shukla1, Nicole F Steinmetz1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Viruses have recently emerged as ideal protein scaffolds for a new class of contrast agents that can be used in medical imaging procedures such as positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Whereas synthetic nanoparticles are difficult to produce as homogeneous formulations due to the inherently stochastic nature of the synthesis process, virus-based nanoparticles are genetically encoded and are therefore produced as homogeneous and monodisperse preparations with a high degree of quality control. Because the virus capsids have a defined chemical structure that has evolved to carry cargoes of nucleic acids, they can be modified to carry precisely defined cargoes of contrast agents and can be decorated with spatially defined contrast reagents on the internal or external surfaces. Viral nanoparticles can also be genetically programed or conjugated with targeting ligands to deliver contrast agents to specific cells, and the natural biocompatibility of viruses means that they are cleared rapidly from the body. Nanoparticles based on bacteriophages and plant viruses are safe for use in humans and can be produced inexpensively in large quantities as self-assembling recombinant proteins. Based on these considerations, a new generation of contrast agents has been developed using bacteriophages and plant viruses as scaffolds to carry positron-emitting radioisotopes such as [(18) F] fluorodeoxyglucose for PET imaging and iron oxide or Gd(3+) for MRI. Although challenges such as immunogenicity, loading efficiency, and regulatory compliance remain to be address, virus-based nanoparticles represent a promising new enabling technology for a new generation of highly biocompatible and biodegradable targeted imaging reagents.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25683790      PMCID: PMC4620044          DOI: 10.1002/wnan.1335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol        ISSN: 1939-0041


  92 in total

1.  Immune responses of BALB/c mice to subcutaneously injected multi-walled carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Jie Meng; Man Yang; Fumin Jia; Zhen Xu; Hua Kong; Haiyan Xu
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.913

2.  Redirecting the coat protein of a spherical virus to assemble into tubular nanostructures.

Authors:  Santanu Mukherjee; Cory M Pfeifer; Jennifer M Johnson; Jay Liu; Adam Zlotnick
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Shape effects of filaments versus spherical particles in flow and drug delivery.

Authors:  Yan Geng; Paul Dalhaimer; Shenshen Cai; Richard Tsai; Manorama Tewari; Tamara Minko; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2007-03-25       Impact factor: 39.213

4.  Systemic trafficking of plant virus nanoparticles in mice via the oral route.

Authors:  Chris S Rae; Ing Wei Khor; Qian Wang; Giuseppe Destito; Maria J Gonzalez; Pratik Singh; Diane M Thomas; Mayra N Estrada; Elizabeth Powell; M G Finn; Marianne Manchester
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 3.616

5.  Viral capsids as MRI contrast agents.

Authors:  Lars Liepold; Stasia Anderson; Deborah Willits; Luke Oltrogge; Joseph A Frank; Trevor Douglas; Mark Young
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  M13-templated magnetic nanoparticles for targeted in vivo imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Debadyuti Ghosh; Youjin Lee; Stephanie Thomas; Aditya G Kohli; Dong Soo Yun; Angela M Belcher; Kimberly A Kelly
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 39.213

7.  Bio-distribution, toxicity and pathology of cowpea mosaic virus nanoparticles in vivo.

Authors:  Pratik Singh; Duane Prasuhn; Robert M Yeh; Giuseppe Destito; Chris S Rae; Kent Osborn; M G Finn; Marianne Manchester
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Plant virus incorporated hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering possess low immunogenicity in vivo.

Authors:  Jittima Amie Luckanagul; L Andrew Lee; Shaojin You; Xiaoming Yang; Qian Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 9.  Viral nanoparticles and virus-like particles: platforms for contemporary vaccine design.

Authors:  Emily M Plummer; Marianne Manchester
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2010-09-24

10.  Dual-modal magnetic resonance and fluorescence imaging of atherosclerotic plaques in vivo using VCAM-1 targeted tobacco mosaic virus.

Authors:  Michael A Bruckman; Kai Jiang; Emily J Simpson; Lauren N Randolph; Leonard G Luyt; Xin Yu; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 11.189

View more
  14 in total

1.  Physalis Mottle Virus-Like Particles as Nanocarriers for Imaging Reagents and Drugs.

Authors:  Hema Masarapu; Bindi K Patel; Paul L Chariou; He Hu; Neetu M Gulati; Bradley L Carpenter; Reza A Ghiladi; Sourabh Shukla; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 6.988

2.  Optical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Fluorous Colloidal Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Jaqueline D Wallat; Anna E Czapar; Charlie Wang; Amy M Wen; Kristen S Wek; Xin Yu; Nicole F Steinmetz; Jonathan K Pokorski
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 6.988

3.  Viral nanoparticles decorated with novel EGFL7 ligands enable intravital imaging of tumor neovasculature.

Authors:  Choi-Fong Cho; Lihai Yu; Tienabe K Nsiama; Alisha N Kadam; Arun Raturi; Sourabh Shukla; Giulio A Amadei; Nicole F Steinmetz; Leonard G Luyt; John D Lewis
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 7.790

4.  Serum albumin 'camouflage' of plant virus based nanoparticles prevents their antibody recognition and enhances pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Andrzej S Pitek; Slater A Jameson; Frank A Veliz; Sourabh Shukla; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Silica-coated Gd(DOTA)-loaded protein nanoparticles enable magnetic resonance imaging of macrophages.

Authors:  Michael A Bruckman; Lauren N Randolph; Neetu M Gulati; Phoebe L Stewart; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 6.  Targeted Nanotheranostics for Future Personalized Medicine: Recent Progress in Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Sung Duk Jo; Sook Hee Ku; You-Yeon Won; Sun Hwa Kim; Ick Chan Kwon
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 7.  Encapsulation of Inorganic Nanomaterials inside Virus-Based Nanoparticles for Bioimaging.

Authors:  Wenjing Zhang; Chengchen Xu; Gen-Quan Yin; Xian-En Zhang; Qiangbin Wang; Feng Li
Journal:  Nanotheranostics       Date:  2017-08-18

Review 8.  Surface impact on nanoparticle-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents.

Authors:  Weizhong Zhang; Lin Liu; Hongmin Chen; Kai Hu; Ian Delahunty; Shi Gao; Jin Xie
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 9.  Optimizing use of theranostic nanoparticles as a life-saving strategy for treating COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Rasha Itani; Mansour Tobaiqy; Achraf Al Faraj
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 10.  Developing Protein-Based Nanoparticles as Versatile Delivery Systems for Cancer Therapy and Imaging.

Authors:  Febrina Sandra; Nisar Ul Khaliq; Anwar Sunna; Andrew Care
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 5.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.