D D Ebert1, M Berking2, P Cuijpers3, D Lehr4, M Pörtner2, H Baumeister5. 1. Leuphana University, Innovation Incubator, Division Health Trainings online, Lueneburg, Germany; Friedrich-Alexander University Nuremberg-Erlangen, Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erlangen, Germany; Department for Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, USA. Electronic address: ebert@leuphana.de. 2. Friedrich-Alexander University Nuremberg-Erlangen, Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erlangen, Germany. 3. Leuphana University, Innovation Incubator, Division Health Trainings online, Lueneburg, Germany; GGZ in Geest, Regional Mental Health Service Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Psychology and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Leuphana University, Innovation Incubator, Division Health Trainings online, Lueneburg, Germany. 5. Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Internet-based interventions (IBI) are effective in treating depression. However, uptake rates in routine care are still limited. Hence, this study aimed to (1) assess the acceptance of IBIs in primary care patients with depressive symptoms and to (2) examine the effects of a brief acceptance facilitating intervention in the form of an informational video on patients' acceptance of IBIs. METHODS:Primary care patients (N=128) with Minor or Major Depression were randomly assigned to an intervention (IG) or control group (CG). Patients in the IG were shown a brief informational video about IBIs before receiving a questionnaire that assessed their acceptance of IBIs and other secondary outcomes. Patients of the CG filled out the questionnaire immediately. RESULTS:Baseline acceptance of IBIs in the CG was high for 6.3%, moderate for 53.1% and low for 40.6% of patients. Acceptance of IBIs was significantly higher in the IG when compared to the CG (d=.71, 95%-CI:.09-2.91). Except for social influence and the general attitude towards psychological treatment, all secondary outcomes were also significantly improved (e.g. effort- (d=.40) and performance-expectancy: d=.65; knowledge about Internet interventions d=.35). LIMITATIONS: Depression of the participants was only assessed using a self-report measure (PHQ-9). CONCLUSION: Primary care patients' acceptance of IBIs for depressive symptoms was low but could be increased significantly using a brief acceptance facilitating intervention on the basis of an informational video. Future studies should further examine the potential of acceptance facilitating interventions for patients and health care providers to exploit the public health impact of IBIs.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Internet-based interventions (IBI) are effective in treating depression. However, uptake rates in routine care are still limited. Hence, this study aimed to (1) assess the acceptance of IBIs in primary care patients with depressive symptoms and to (2) examine the effects of a brief acceptance facilitating intervention in the form of an informational video on patients' acceptance of IBIs. METHODS: Primary care patients (N=128) with Minor or Major Depression were randomly assigned to an intervention (IG) or control group (CG). Patients in the IG were shown a brief informational video about IBIs before receiving a questionnaire that assessed their acceptance of IBIs and other secondary outcomes. Patients of the CG filled out the questionnaire immediately. RESULTS: Baseline acceptance of IBIs in the CG was high for 6.3%, moderate for 53.1% and low for 40.6% of patients. Acceptance of IBIs was significantly higher in the IG when compared to the CG (d=.71, 95%-CI:.09-2.91). Except for social influence and the general attitude towards psychological treatment, all secondary outcomes were also significantly improved (e.g. effort- (d=.40) and performance-expectancy: d=.65; knowledge about Internet interventions d=.35). LIMITATIONS: Depression of the participants was only assessed using a self-report measure (PHQ-9). CONCLUSION: Primary care patients' acceptance of IBIs for depressive symptoms was low but could be increased significantly using a brief acceptance facilitating intervention on the basis of an informational video. Future studies should further examine the potential of acceptance facilitating interventions for patients and health care providers to exploit the public health impact of IBIs.
Authors: Jiaxi Lin; Sarah Paganini; Lasse Sander; Marianne Lüking; David Daniel Ebert; Monica Buhrman; Gerhard Andersson; Harald Baumeister Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Severin Hennemann; Michael Witthöft; Matthias Bethge; Katja Spanier; Manfred E Beutel; Rüdiger Zwerenz Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Jennifer Greif Green; Katie A McLaughlin; Mirko Fillbrunn; Marie Fukuda; James S Jackson; Ronald C Kessler; Ekaterina Sadikova; Nancy A Sampson; Corrie Vilsaint; David R Williams; Mario Cruz-Gonzalez; Margarita Alegría Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2020-07
Authors: David Daniel Ebert; Marvin Franke; Fanny Kählke; Ann-Marie Küchler; Ronny Bruffaerts; Philippe Mortier; Eirini Karyotaki; Jordi Alonso; Pim Cuijpers; Matthias Berking; Randy P Auerbach; Ronald C Kessler; Harald Baumeister Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Eileen Bendig; Natalie Bauereiß; David Daniel Ebert; Frank Snoek; Gerhard Andersson; Harald Baumeister Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Harald Baumeister; Natalie Bauereiss; Anna-Carlotta Zarski; Lina Braun; Claudia Buntrock; Christian Hoherz; Abdul Rahman Idrees; Robin Kraft; Pauline Meyer; Tran Bao Dat Nguyen; Rüdiger Pryss; Manfred Reichert; Theresa Sextl; Maria Steinhoff; Lena Stenzel; Lena Steubl; Yannik Terhorst; Ingrid Titzler; David Daniel Ebert Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Mun Joo Choi; Seo-Joon Lee; Sun Jung Lee; Mi Jung Rho; Dai-Jin Kim; In Young Choi Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 4.157