Jiaxi Lin1, Sarah Paganini, Lasse Sander, Marianne Lüking, David Daniel Ebert, Monica Buhrman, Gerhard Andersson, Harald Baumeister. 1. Department of Rehabilitational Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Freiburg; Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Private Practice, Freiburg; Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg; Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden; Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, and Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education Science, University of Ulm.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Persons with chronic pain can be treated effectively with acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). In this trial, we examined the effectiveness of guided and unguided ACT-based online treatment (ACTonPain) for chronic pain patients. METHODS:302 individuals were randomly assigned to ACTonPain with or without guidance (n = 100/101) or to a waiting-list control group (n=101). The primary outcome was pain interference as measured by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory. The secondary outcomes were physical and emotional functioning, pain intensity, ACT process variables, quality of life, satisfaction with the intervention, adherence, and participants' rating of overall improvement. The online measurements were carried out before randomization (T0) and 9 weeks and 6 months after randomization (T1 and T2, respectively). Intention-to-treat (ITT) data analysis was supplemented with additional per-protocol analyses. RESULTS: The guided ACTonPain group showed significantly less pain interference than the control group in the ITT analysis (p = 0.01), with a moderate effect size at T1 and T2 (d = 0.58 respectively), corresponding to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 3.14 for both time points. Participants in the guided ACTonPain group also indicated higher pain acceptance (T1: d = 0.59; T2: d = 0.76). The unguided ACTonPain group showed to be significantly less depressed in comparison to the control group at at time T2 (d = 0.50). No significant differences with respect to effectiveness were found between the two ACTonPain groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The online intervention ACTonPain is effective for persons with chronic pain when the program is guided. Further research in a variety of settings of health care is needed in order to determine whether and how ACTonPain can be implemented.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Persons with chronic pain can be treated effectively with acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). In this trial, we examined the effectiveness of guided and unguided ACT-based online treatment (ACTonPain) for chronic painpatients. METHODS: 302 individuals were randomly assigned to ACTonPain with or without guidance (n = 100/101) or to a waiting-list control group (n=101). The primary outcome was pain interference as measured by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory. The secondary outcomes were physical and emotional functioning, pain intensity, ACT process variables, quality of life, satisfaction with the intervention, adherence, and participants' rating of overall improvement. The online measurements were carried out before randomization (T0) and 9 weeks and 6 months after randomization (T1 and T2, respectively). Intention-to-treat (ITT) data analysis was supplemented with additional per-protocol analyses. RESULTS: The guided ACTonPain group showed significantly less pain interference than the control group in the ITT analysis (p = 0.01), with a moderate effect size at T1 and T2 (d = 0.58 respectively), corresponding to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 3.14 for both time points. Participants in the guided ACTonPain group also indicated higher pain acceptance (T1: d = 0.59; T2: d = 0.76). The unguided ACTonPain group showed to be significantly less depressed in comparison to the control group at at time T2 (d = 0.50). No significant differences with respect to effectiveness were found between the two ACTonPain groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The online intervention ACTonPain is effective for persons with chronic pain when the program is guided. Further research in a variety of settings of health care is needed in order to determine whether and how ACTonPain can be implemented.
Authors: Winfried Häuser; Fritjof Bock; Peter Engeser; Thomas Tölle; Anne Willweber-Strumpfe; Frank Petzke Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: L Radbruch; G Loick; P Kiencke; G Lindena; R Sabatowski; S Grond; K A Lehmann; C S Cleeland Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Bernd Löwe; Oliver Decker; Stefanie Müller; Elmar Brähler; Dieter Schellberg; Wolfgang Herzog; Philipp Yorck Herzberg Journal: Med Care Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Kathleen W Wyrwich; Dorcas Beaton; Charles S Cleeland; John T Farrar; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Mark P Jensen; Robert D Kerns; Deborah N Ader; Nancy Brandenburg; Laurie B Burke; David Cella; Julie Chandler; Penny Cowan; Rozalina Dimitrova; Raymond Dionne; Sharon Hertz; Alejandro R Jadad; Nathaniel P Katz; Henrik Kehlet; Lynn D Kramer; Donald C Manning; Cynthia McCormick; Michael P McDermott; Henry J McQuay; Sanjay Patel; Linda Porter; Steve Quessy; Bob A Rappaport; Christine Rauschkolb; Dennis A Revicki; Margaret Rothman; Kenneth E Schmader; Brett R Stacey; Joseph W Stauffer; Thorsten von Stein; Richard E White; James Witter; Stojan Zavisic Journal: J Pain Date: 2007-12-11 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Christopher Eccleston; Emma Fisher; Lorraine Craig; Geoffrey B Duggan; Benjamin A Rosser; Edmund Keogh Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2014-02-26
Authors: Matthew S Herbert; Cara Dochat; Jennalee S Wooldridge; Karla Materna; Brian H Blanco; Mara Tynan; Michael W Lee; Marianna Gasperi; Angela Camodeca; Devon Harris; Niloofar Afari Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2021-11-12
Authors: Harald Baumeister; Natalie Bauereiss; Anna-Carlotta Zarski; Lina Braun; Claudia Buntrock; Christian Hoherz; Abdul Rahman Idrees; Robin Kraft; Pauline Meyer; Tran Bao Dat Nguyen; Rüdiger Pryss; Manfred Reichert; Theresa Sextl; Maria Steinhoff; Lena Stenzel; Lena Steubl; Yannik Terhorst; Ingrid Titzler; David Daniel Ebert Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Jiaxi Lin; Lasse Sander; Sarah Paganini; Sandra Schlicker; David Ebert; Matthias Berking; Jürgen Bengel; Stephanie Nobis; Dirk Lehr; Oskar Mittag; Heleen Riper; Harald Baumeister Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 2.692