Literature DB >> 25682192

Validating the prognostic and discriminating value of the TNM-classification for gastric cancer - a critical appraisal.

C Röcken1, H-M Behrens2.   

Abstract

AIM: We investigated the effect of the new tumour-, node-, metastasis- (TNM) classification on predicting and discriminating gastric cancer patient prognosis using the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the SEER-database we retrieved gastric cancer patients with a primary adenocarcinoma, of Caucasian or Asian ethnicity and without distant metastases (M0). The pTNM-stage was determined according to the 7th edition of the union internationale contre le cancer (UICC) guidelines.
RESULTS: Spanning the period 2004-2010, 6136 patients fulfilled all inclusion criteria including 3424 (55.8%) men, 2712 (44.2%) women, 4629 (75.4%) Caucasian and 1507 (24.6%) Asian patients. 1524 (24.8%) patients underwent total gastrectomy and 4612 (75.2%) non-total gastrectomy. Only in 41.2% of the patients were >15 lymph nodes resected. 1857 (31.0%) patients received radiotherapy. Patient survival depended on ethnicity, type of surgery and radiotherapy. The discriminating value of the UICC-stage grouping could not be validated for Caucasian patients with >15 lymph nodes resected and who had not received radiotherapy: stage groups IIB, IIIA, IIIB and IIIC showed substantial overlap in survival ranges. In addition, the tumour specific survival of the different T-/N-combinations was significantly different in stage groups IIIB and IIIC, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective analysis of the SEER-database does not validate the discriminating value of stage grouping of the 7th edition of the UICC-stage grouping. A revision should be considered and more reliable prognostic biomarkers are urgently needed.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; Prognosis; Stage grouping; TNM-classification

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25682192     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.01.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Gastric tumors and tumor precursors].

Authors:  C Röcken
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Validation of the 7th AJCC/UICC staging system for gastric cancer and a proposal for a new TNM system based on a prognostic score: a retrospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Oh Kyoung Kwon; Se Won Kim; Hyun-Dong Chae; Seung Wan Ryu; Ho Young Chung; Sang Woon Kim; Won Kee Lee; Wansik Yu
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 1.859

3.  Perioperative outcomes and survival in elderly patients aged ≥ 75 years undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an 18-year retrospective analysis in a single Western centre.

Authors:  Elinor Tan; Susanna Lam; Shew Phyo Han; David Storey; Charbel Sandroussi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Apparent diffusion coefficient by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a sole biomarker for staging and prognosis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Giganti; Alessandro Ambrosi; Damiano Chiari; Elena Orsenigo; Antonio Esposito; Elena Mazza; Luca Albarello; Carlo Staudacher; Alessandro Del Maschio; Francesco De Cobelli
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  NR1H3 Expression is a Prognostic Factor of Overall Survival for Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Junlong Wu; Fangning Wan; Haoyue Sheng; Guohai Shi; Yijun Shen; Guowen Lin; Bo Dai; Yiping Zhu; Dingwei Ye
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  A comparison of the operative outcomes of D1 and D2 gastrectomy performed at a single Western center with multiple surgeons: a retrospective analysis with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Susanna Lam; Elinor Tan; Audrey Menezes; David Martin; James Gallagher; David Storey; Charbel Sandroussi
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th edition) changes for patients with stage III gastric cancer: survival analysis of a large series from a Specialized Eastern Center.

Authors:  Jun Lu; Chao-Hui Zheng; Long-Long Cao; Shao-Wei Ling; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Qi-Yue Chen; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Ki67--An unsuitable marker of gastric cancer prognosis unmasks intratumoral heterogeneity.

Authors:  Christine Böger; Hans-Michael Behrens; Christoph Röcken
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Meta-analysis of microRNAs as biomarkers for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Lin-Feng Zheng; Wen-Yong Sun
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2016-06-23

Review 10.  Seventh tumor-node-metastasis staging of gastric cancer: Five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Stefano Rausei; Laura Ruspi; Federica Galli; Vincenzo Pappalardo; Giuseppe Di Rocco; Francesco Martignoni; Francesco Frattini; Francesca Rovera; Luigi Boni; Gianlorenzo Dionigi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.