Literature DB >> 25680839

Ethnobotany of medicinal plants among the communities of Alpine and Sub-alpine regions of Pakistan.

Sadaf Kayani1, Mushtaq Ahmad2, Shazia Sultana1, Zabta Khan Shinwari3, Muhammed Zafar1, Ghulam Yaseen1, Manzoor Hussain4, Tahira Bibi5.   

Abstract

ETHNO-PHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: To best of our knowledge it is first quantitative ethno-botanical study from Alpine and Sub-alpine, Western Himalaya of Pakistan. The study aims to report, compare the uses and highlight the ethno-botanical significance of medicinal plants for treatment of various diseases.
METHODS: A total of 290 (278 males and 12 females) informants including 14 Local Traditional Healers (LTHs) were interviewed. Information was collected using semi-structured interviews, analyzed and compared by quantitative ethno-botanical indices such as Informant Consensus Factor (ICF), Relative frequency of citation (RFC), use value (UV), Fidelity Level (FL) and Jaccard index (JI).
RESULTS: A total of 125 plant species (Gymnosperms 7 species, Monocotyledons 2 and 116 Di-cotyledons) belonging to 41 families are collected, identified and ethno-botanically assessed. The most dominant family is Ranunculaceae (20 species) followed by Rosaceae (14 species). In diseases treated, gastrointestinal tract (GIT) diseases have highest proportion (27.5%) followed by respiratory diseases (20%) in the mountain communities. The most dominant life form of plants used is herbs (78%) followed by shrubs (19%) while the most commonly used plant parts are leaves (44 reports) followed by underground part, the roots (37 reports). The highest ICF (0.68) is found for ear, nose and eye disease category followed by respiratory disorders (0.46). There are 15 medicinal plants having 100% FL. Use value (UV) and Relative frequency of citation (RFC) range from 0.03 to 0.53 and 0.04 to 0.23 respectively. In comparison, maximum similarity index is found in the studies with JI 19.52 followed by 17.39. Similarity percentage of plant uses range from 1.69% to 19.52% while dissimilarity percentage varies from 0% to 20%.
CONCLUSIONS: The Alpine and Sub-alpine regions of Pakistan are rich in medicinal plants and still need more research exploration. On the other hand, ethno-botanical knowledge in study areas is decreasing day by day due to high emigration rates resulting from after effects of wars during the last few decades. Historically developed ethno-botanical heritage should be preserved and promoted on global level for analyzing phytochemical, pharmaceutical and other biological activities for future drug discovery.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpine–Subalpine regions; Ethno-botanical indices; Ethnobotany; Pakistan

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25680839     DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol        ISSN: 0378-8741            Impact factor:   4.360


  19 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review on Comparative Analysis, Toxicology, and Pharmacology of Medicinal Plants Against Haemonchus contortus.

Authors:  Rehman Ali; Muhammad Rooman; Sakina Mussarat; Sadia Norin; Shandana Ali; Muhammad Adnan; Shahid Niaz Khan
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 2.  Himalayan Aromatic Medicinal Plants: A Review of their Ethnopharmacology, Volatile Phytochemistry, and Biological Activities.

Authors:  Rakesh K Joshi; Prabodh Satyal; Wiliam N Setzer
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-19

3.  An ethnopharmacological evaluation of Navapind and Shahpur Virkanin district Sheikupura, Pakistan for their herbal medicines.

Authors:  Maria Zahoor; Zubaida Yousaf; Tahreem Aqsa; Manahil Haroon; Nadia Saleh; Arusa Aftab; Sadia Javed; Mouzma Qadeer; Habiba Ramazan
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.733

4.  Descriptive study of plant resources in the context of the ethnomedicinal relevance of indigenous flora: A case study from Toli Peer National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan.

Authors:  Muhammad Shoaib Amjad; Mirza Faisal Qaeem; Israr Ahmad; Sami Ullah Khan; Sunbal Khalil Chaudhari; Nafeesa Zahid Malik; Humaira Shaheen; Arshad Mehmood Khan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Ethnomedicinal plants used by local inhabitants of Jakholi block, Rudraprayag district, western Himalaya, India.

Authors:  Ankit Singh; Mohan C Nautiyal; Ripu M Kunwar; Rainer W Bussmann
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.733

6.  Quantitative Ethnobotany of Medicinal Plants Used by Indigenous Communities in the Bandarban District of Bangladesh.

Authors:  Mohammad O Faruque; Shaikh B Uddin; James W Barlow; Sheng Hu; Shuang Dong; Qian Cai; Xiaohua Li; Xuebo Hu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  Are identities oral? Understanding ethnobotanical knowledge after Irish independence (1937-1939).

Authors:  Fiona Shannon; Astrid Sasse; Helen Sheridan; Michael Heinrich
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.733

8.  Regional trade of medicinal plants has facilitated the retention of traditional knowledge: case study in Gilgit-Baltistan Pakistan.

Authors:  Muhammad Asad Salim; Sailesh Ranjitkar; Robbie Hart; Tika Khan; Sajid Ali; Chandni Kiran; Asma Parveen; Zahra Batool; Shanila Bano; Jianchu Xu
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.733

9.  Exploration of ethno-medicinal knowledge among rural communities of Pearl Valley; Rawalakot, District Poonch Azad Jammu and Kashmir.

Authors:  Humaira Shaheen; Mirza Faisal Qaseem; Muhammad Shoaib Amjad; Piero Bruschi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ethnobotany of Anti-hypertensive Plants Used in Northern Pakistan.

Authors:  Khafsa Malik; Mushtaq Ahmad; Rainer W Bussmann; Akash Tariq; Riaz Ullah; Ali S Alqahtani; Abdelaaty A Shahat; Neelam Rashid; Muhammad Zafar; Shazia Sultana; Syed N Shah
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 5.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.