| Literature DB >> 30087613 |
Khafsa Malik1, Mushtaq Ahmad1,2, Rainer W Bussmann3, Akash Tariq4,5, Riaz Ullah6, Ali S Alqahtani6, Abdelaaty A Shahat6,7, Neelam Rashid1, Muhammad Zafar1, Shazia Sultana1,2, Syed N Shah1.
Abstract
Hypertension is one of the most important factors responsible for cardiovascular ailments worldwide. It has been observed that herbal products and alternative herbal therapies played a significant role in decreasing hypertension. The aim of the current study is to provide significant ethnopharmacological information, both qualitative and quantitative on medicinal plants related to hypertension from Northern Pakistan. The documented data were quantitatively analyzed for the first time in this area. A total of 250 participants were interviewed through semi-structured discussions and questionnaires. Quantitative indices including FC (Frequency citation), FIV (Family importance value), RFC (Relative frequency of citation) and DCI (Disease Consensus index) were calculated. A total of 192 plant species, belonging to 77 families were reported to be used in treatment of hypertension in Northern Pakistan. The most dominant life form reported was herbs (54%), with decoction (72 reports) and leaves (55.1%) were commonly utilized plant part. Highest FIV was recorded in Lamiaceae (327 FIV). RFC ranged from 0.08 to 1.08% while DCI varied from 0.233 to 0.000. In this study original data was compared with thirty one previous national and international published papers from neighboring region to compare the medicinal uses and obtain some novel plant species. About 42% of the medicinal plant species were reported for the first time in treatment of hypertension in comparison to these 31 published papers. Different phytochemical activities of antihypertensive plants were also reported from literature. This research work documents the traditional knowledge of medicinal plants usage and provides baseline in designing clinical trials and pharmacological analysis for treatment of hypertension.Entities:
Keywords: Northern Pakistan; disease consensus index; ethnobotany; hypertension; medicinal plant
Year: 2018 PMID: 30087613 PMCID: PMC6066661 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00789
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Figure 1Map of the study area.
Demographic profile of participants.
| 1. | Gender | Female | 55 | 22 |
| Male | 195 | 78 | ||
| 2. | Informant category | Local people | 175 | 70 |
| Herbalist | 75 | 30 | ||
| 3. | Age group | 35–45 | 16 | 7 |
| 45–55 | 72 | 28 | ||
| 55–65 | 114 | 46 | ||
| Above than 65 | 48 | 19 | ||
| 4. | Educational background | Illiterate | 78 | 31 |
| Completed 6 years of education | 65 | 26 | ||
| Completed 10 years of education | 46 | 18 | ||
| Completed 12 years of education | 31 | 12 | ||
| 16 years of education | 20 | 8 | ||
| Higher education | 10 | 4 | ||
| 5. | Resident | Urban | 78 | 31 |
| Rural | 172 | 69 |
Comparison of present study with previous studies at neighboring, regional and global level.
| 1 | UK | 2001 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 196 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Mansoor, |
| 2 | South Africa | 2003 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 195 | 99.4898 | 0.510204 | 0 | 0.515464 | Somova et al., |
| 3 | Morocco | 2001 | 90 | 1 | 23 | 24 | 26.66667 | 66 | 172 | 87.7551 | 0.510204 | 11.73469 | 11.21495 | Jouad et al., |
| 4 | Morocco | 2002 | 92 | 43 | 0 | 43 | 46.73913 | 49 | 153 | 78.06122 | 21.93878 | 0 | 27.04403 | Eddouks et al., |
| 5 | Morocco | 2006 | 64 | 36 | 0 | 36 | 56.25 | 28 | 160 | 81.63265 | 18.36735 | 0 | 23.68421 | Tahraoui et al., |
| 6 | Loja and Zamora-Chinchipe, Ecuador | 2007 | 275 | 6 | 24 | 30 | 10.90909 | 245 | 166 | 84.69388 | 3.061224 | 12.2449 | 7.874016 | Tene et al., |
| 7 | Malaysia | 2010 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 196 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tee et al., |
| 8 | DIR Pakistan 2015 | 2015 | 46 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 26.08696 | 34 | 184 | 93.87755 | 6.122449 | 0 | 5.825243 | Ahmad et al., |
| 9 | Chennai | 2011 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 50 | 5 | 191 | 97.44898 | 2.55102 | 0 | 2.617801 | Roy, |
| 10 | Ghana | 2005 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 8 | 194 | 98.97959 | 1.020408 | 0 | 1 | Abel and Busia, |
| 11 | Nepal | 2008 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 33.33333 | 2 | 195 | 99.4898 | 0 | 0.510204 | 0.510204 | Kunwar and Bussmann, |
| 12 | Nepal | 2006 | 84 | .0 | 2 | 2 | 2.380952 | 82 | 194 | 98.97959 | 0 | 1.020408 | 0.729927 | Kunwar et al., |
| 13 | Uttar Pardesh | 2007 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 196 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Verma et al., |
| 14 | India | 2011 | 57 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3.508772 | 55 | 194 | 98.97959 | 0 | 1.020408 | 0.809717 | Kumar et al., |
| 15 | Nepal | 2010 | 48 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2.083333 | 47 | 195 | 99.4898 | 0 | 0.510204 | 0.414938 | Kunwar et al., |
| 16 | Swat, Pakistan | 2013 | 54 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 27.77778 | 39 | 181 | 92.34694 | 0 | 7.653061 | 7.317073 | Akhtar et al., |
| 17 | Lesser Himalaya Pakistan | 2013 | 45 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6.666667 | 42 | 193 | 98.46939 | 0 | 1.530612 | 1.293103 | Abbasi et al., |
| 18 | Swat Pakistan | 2014 | 50 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 44 | 190 | 96.93878 | 0 | 3.061224 | 2.631579 | Ahmad et al., |
| 19 | Karakoram range Pakistan | 2014 | 50 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 47 | 193 | 98.46939 | 0 | 1.530612 | 1.265823 | Bano et al., |
| 20 | Pakistan | 2014 | 26 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11.53846 | 23 | 193 | 98.46939 | 0 | 1.530612 | 1.408451 | Sher et al., |
| 21 | South East Asia | 2015 | 183 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 183 | 196 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Hidayati et al., |
| 22 | Bhutan | 2015 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 196 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Wangchuk and Tobgay, |
| 23 | Afghanistan | 2016 | 72 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 6.944444 | 67 | 191 | 97.44898 | 0 | 2.55102 | 1.976285 | Soelberg and Jäger, |
| 24 | China | 2016 | 54 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 9.259259 | 49 | 191 | 97.44898 | 0 | 2.55102 | 2.12766 | Kang et al., |
| 25 | Iran | 1999 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 195 | 99.4898 | 0.510204 | 0 | 0.515464 | Faraji and Tarkhani, |
| 26 | Cameroon | 2002 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 195 | 99.4898 | 0.510204 | 0 | 0.515464 | Dimo et al., |
| 27 | Pakistan | 2017 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 196 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Saqib and Janbaz, |
| 28 | Nigeria | 2012 | 70 | 13 | 0 | 13 | 18.57143 | 57 | 183 | 93.36735 | 6.632653 | 0 | 5.726872 | Gbolade, |
| 29 | Chinese | 2014 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 196 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tsai et al., |
| 30 | Buner Pakistan | 2011 | 216 | 0 | 22 | 22 | 10.18519 | 194 | 174 | 88.77551 | 0 | 11.22449 | 6.358382 | Sher et al., |
| 31 | Swat Pakistan | 2011 | 90 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 81 | 187 | 95.40816 | 0 | 4.591837 | 3.474903 | Ali et al., |
| Average | 55.19355 | 3.903226 | 4 | 7.903226 | 22.48069 | 47.29032 | 188.0968 | 95.96774 | 1.991442 | 2.040816 | 3.769405 |
Figure 2Dominant families of medicinal plants in the study area.
Figure 3Plant part used for treatment of hypertension.
Figure 4Life forms of medicinal plants.
Figure 5Mode of utilization of medicinal plants.
Figure 6Family importance value of medicinal plants.