Literature DB >> 25679962

Exploring the planetary boundary for chemical pollution.

Miriam L Diamond1, Cynthia A de Wit2, Sverker Molander3, Martin Scheringer4, Thomas Backhaus5, Rainer Lohmann6, Rickard Arvidsson3, Åke Bergman7, Michael Hauschild8, Ivan Holoubek9, Linn Persson10, Noriyuki Suzuki11, Marco Vighi12, Cornelius Zetzsch13.   

Abstract

Rockström et al. (2009a, 2009b) have warned that humanity must reduce anthropogenic impacts defined by nine planetary boundaries if "unacceptable global change" is to be avoided. Chemical pollution was identified as one of those boundaries for which continued impacts could erode the resilience of ecosystems and humanity. The central concept of the planetary boundary (or boundaries) for chemical pollution (PBCP or PBCPs) is that the Earth has a finite assimilative capacity for chemical pollution, which includes persistent, as well as readily degradable chemicals released at local to regional scales, which in aggregate threaten ecosystem and human viability. The PBCP allows humanity to explicitly address the increasingly global aspects of chemical pollution throughout a chemical's life cycle and the need for a global response of internationally coordinated control measures. We submit that sufficient evidence shows stresses on ecosystem and human health at local to global scales, suggesting that conditions are transgressing the safe operating space delimited by a PBCP. As such, current local to global pollution control measures are insufficient. However, while the PBCP is an important conceptual step forward, at this point single or multiple PBCPs are challenging to operationalize due to the extremely large number of commercial chemicals or mixtures of chemicals that cause myriad adverse effects to innumerable species and ecosystems, and the complex linkages between emissions, environmental concentrations, exposures and adverse effects. As well, the normative nature of a PBCP presents challenges of negotiating pollution limits amongst societal groups with differing viewpoints. Thus, a combination of approaches is recommended as follows: develop indicators of chemical pollution, for both control and response variables, that will aid in quantifying a PBCP(s) and gauging progress towards reducing chemical pollution; develop new technologies and technical and social approaches to mitigate global chemical pollution that emphasize a preventative approach; coordinate pollution control and sustainability efforts; and facilitate implementation of multiple (and potentially decentralized) control efforts involving scientists, civil society, government, non-governmental organizations and international bodies.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical emissions; Chemical management; Chemical pollution; Ecosystem health protection; Global threshold; Human health protection; Planetary boundary; Pollution controls; Stockholm Convention; Tipping point

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25679962     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  16 in total

Review 1.  Paving ways for a sustainable future: a literature review.

Authors:  Qinglong Shao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework Directive: Recommendations for more efficient assessment and management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources.

Authors:  Werner Brack; Valeria Dulio; Marlene Ågerstrand; Ian Allan; Rolf Altenburger; Markus Brinkmann; Dirk Bunke; Robert M Burgess; Ian Cousins; Beate I Escher; Félix J Hernández; L Mark Hewitt; Klára Hilscherová; Juliane Hollender; Henner Hollert; Robert Kase; Bernd Klauer; Claudia Lindim; David López Herráez; Cécil Miège; John Munthe; Simon O'Toole; Leo Posthuma; Heinz Rüdel; Ralf B Schäfer; Manfred Sengl; Foppe Smedes; Dik van de Meent; Paul J van den Brink; Jos van Gils; Annemarie P van Wezel; A Dick Vethaak; Etienne Vermeirssen; Peter C von der Ohe; Branislav Vrana
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Scientific Basis for Managing PFAS as a Chemical Class.

Authors:  Carol F Kwiatkowski; David Q Andrews; Linda S Birnbaum; Thomas A Bruton; Jamie C DeWitt; Detlef R U Knappe; Maricel V Maffini; Mark F Miller; Katherine E Pelch; Anna Reade; Anna Soehl; Xenia Trier; Marta Venier; Charlotte C Wagner; Zhanyun Wang; Arlene Blum
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2020-06-30

4.  In Silico Screening-Level Prioritization of 8468 Chemicals Produced in OECD Countries to Identify Potential Planetary Boundary Threats.

Authors:  Efstathios Reppas-Chrysovitsinos; Anna Sobek; Matthew MacLeod
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 5.  Methodological Advances to Study Contaminant Biotransformation: New Prospects for Understanding and Reducing Environmental Persistence?

Authors:  Kathrin Fenner; Martin Elsner; Tillmann Lueders; Michael S McLachlan; Lawrence P Wackett; Michael Zimmermann; Jörg E Drewes
Journal:  ACS ES T Water       Date:  2021-06-24

Review 6.  Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities.

Authors:  Linn Persson; Bethanie M Carney Almroth; Christopher D Collins; Sarah Cornell; Cynthia A de Wit; Miriam L Diamond; Peter Fantke; Martin Hassellöv; Matthew MacLeod; Morten W Ryberg; Peter Søgaard Jørgensen; Patricia Villarrubia-Gómez; Zhanyun Wang; Michael Zwicky Hauschild
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 11.357

7.  A combined experimental and modeling study to evaluate pH-dependent sorption of polar and non-polar compounds to polyethylene and polystyrene microplastics.

Authors:  Sven Seidensticker; Peter Grathwohl; Jonas Lamprecht; Christiane Zarfl
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 5.893

8.  Towards defining an environmental investment universe within planetary boundaries.

Authors:  Christoph Butz; Jürg Liechti; Julia Bodin; Sarah E Cornell
Journal:  Sustain Sci       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 6.367

9.  Advances, Norms, and Perspectives in Product Chemical Footprint Research.

Authors:  Yi Li; Yiman Cheng; Luyao Zhou; Yongliang Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Building a European exposure science strategy.

Authors:  Peter Fantke; Natalie von Goetz; Urs Schlüter; Jos Bessems; Alison Connolly; Tatsiana Dudzina; Andreas Ahrens; Jim Bridges; Marie A Coggins; André Conrad; Otto Hänninen; Gerhard Heinemeyer; Stylianos Kephalopoulos; Michael McLachlan; Tim Meijster; Veronique Poulsen; Dag Rother; Theo Vermeire; Susana Viegas; Jelle Vlaanderen; Maryam Zare Jeddi; Yuri Bruinen de Bruin
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.