Literature DB >> 25679307

Multiple hepatic sclerosing hemangioma mimicking metastatic liver tumor successfully treated by laparoscopic surgery: Report of a case.

Masaki Wakasugi1, Shigeyuki Ueshima2, Mitsuyoshi Tei2, Masayuki Tori2, Ken-Ichi Yoshida3, Masahiko Tsujimoto3, Hiroki Akamatsu2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hepatic sclerosing hemangioma is a very rare benign tumor, characterized by fibrosis and hyalinization occurring in association with degeneration of a hepatic cavernous hemangioma. We report here a rare case of multiple hepatic sclerosing hemangioma mimicking metastatic liver tumor that was successfully treated using laparoscopic surgery. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 67-year-old woman with multiple liver tumors underwent single-incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy under a diagnosis of advanced sigmoid cancer with multiple liver metastases. Examination of surgical specimens of sigmoid colon revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma invading the serosa, and no lymph node metastases. Serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 remained within normal limits throughout the course. Two months after sigmoidectomy, the patient underwent laparoscopic partial hepatectomy of S1 and S6 of the liver and cholecystectomy. Histopathological examination showed that the tumors mainly comprised hyalinized tissue and collagen fibers with sporadic vascular spaces on hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections, yielding a diagnosis of multiple hepatic sclerosing hemangioma. No evidence of recurrence has been seen as of 21 months postoperatively. DISCUSSION: Differentiating multiple sclerosing hemangiomas from metastatic liver tumors was quite difficult because the radiological findings were closely compatible with liver metastases. Laroscopic hepatectomy provided less blood loss, a shorter duration of hospitalization, and good cosmetic results.
CONCLUSION: Sclerosing hemangioma should be included among the differential diagnoses of multiple liver tumors in patients with colorectal cancer. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is useful for diagnostic therapy for undiagnosed multiple liver tumors.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatic sclerosing hemangioma; Laparoscopic liver resection; Metastatic liver tumor

Year:  2015        PMID: 25679307      PMCID: PMC4353964          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.01.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep        ISSN: 2210-2612


Introduction

Hepatic sclerosing hemangioma is a very rare benign tumor, characterized by fibrosis and hyalinization occurring in association with degeneration of a hepatic cavernous hemangioma [1]. Because the radiological features can resemble those of hepatic malignancies such as metastatic liver cancer, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC), or fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (FLC), definitive preoperative diagnosis may be difficult, particularly in cases showing multiple tumors. Laparoscopic hepatectomy has become a useful method of diagnostic therapy for patients with liver tumors with the progress of surgical techniques and laparoscopic devices [2]. We report here a rare case of multiple hepatic sclerosing hemangioma mimicking metastatic liver tumor that was successfully treated using laparoscopic surgery.

Case presentation

A previously healthy 67-year-old woman presented with blood in the stool. Colonoscopy showed a type 2 sigmoid cancer. Examination of biopsy specimens revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 were 1.8 ng/mL and 5 U/mL, respectively. Computed tomography (CT) showed a ring-enhancing 28 mm exophytic lesion arising from S6 of the liver (Fig. 1a). No additional hepatic lesions were identified on CT. On dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), T1-weighted imaging showed a signal-hypointense mass in S6 (Fig. 1b). After contrast enhancement, the mass showed a similar enhancement pattern to that seen on dynamic CT. T2-weighted imaging showed a mass with heterogeneous signal intensity. A similar small nodule 11 mm in diameter was also detected in S1 (Fig. 1b). These findings led to a diagnosis of advanced sigmoid cancer with multiple liver metastases. The patient first underwent single-incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in April 2013. Examination of surgical specimens revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma invading the serosa, with no lymph node metastases. Serum levels of CEA and CA19-9 remained within normal limits throughout the course. CT showed no changes in tumor size. In June 2013, the patient underwent laparoscopic partial hepatectomy of S1 and S6, and cholecystectomy. She was placed in a supine position with legs apart. A 12 mm blunt tip trocar for a 10 mm flexible scope was placed at the umbilicus, through which carbon dioxide gas was delivered. Pneumoperitoneum was controlled to a pressure of 8 mm Hg. An additional three trocars were located as shown in Fig. 2. Intraoperative laparoscopic observation showed two well-demarcated, white tumors on the surface of S1 and S6 (Fig. 3). The lesser omentum was sectioned and the hepatoduodenal ligament was encircled by tape to be used as a tourniquet for complete interruption of blood inflow to the liver, only if necessary. After laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed, partial hepatectomy of S1 and S6 was performed using laparoscopic coagulation shears, an ultrasound surgical aspirator, and a vessel-sealing device, considering the possibility that these liver tumors represented metastases from the sigmoid colon cancer. The operative time was 345 min. Blood loss was minimal. Histopathological examination showed that the tumors mainly comprised hyalinized tissue and collagen fibers with sporadic vascular space on sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin, yielding a diagnosis of multiple hepatic sclerosing hemangioma (Fig. 4). The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 8. No evidence of recurrence has been seen during the 21 months of follow-up.
Fig. 1

Imaging results.

(a) Computed tomography shows a ring-enhancing 28-mm exophytic lesion (arrowhead) arising from S6 of the liver. GB, gallbladder. (b) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging shows a signal-hypointense mass in S6. A similar small nodule (arrow) is apparent in S1.

Fig. 2

Port site for laparoscopic surgery.

Fig. 3

Intraoperative laparoscopic observation.

Two well-demarcated, white tumors are apparent on the surface of S6 (a) and S1 (b).

Fig. 4

Pathological examination.

The tumors mainly comprise hyalinized tissue and collagen fibers with sporadic vascular spaces on sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin.

Discussion

The clinical course of this patient suggests two important clinical issues. First, sclerosing hemangioma should be included among the differential diagnoses of multiple liver tumors in patients with colorectal cancer. Sclerosing hemangioma is a rare type of hepatic hemangioma composed of abundant acellular hyalinized tissue in which small vessels are occasionally seen [1]. Only 17 resected cases, including the present case, with detailed information on patients with hepatic sclerosing hemangioma have been reported in the English literature (Table 1) [3-17]. To the best of our knowledge, this report is the first to describe multiple hepatic sclerosing hemangiomas treated by laparoscopic surgery. A review of previously reported cases revealed that sclerosing hemangioma tends to occur more frequently in women than in men (6 men, 10 women), and occurs most frequently in middle to elder age, with a median age of 65 years (range, 41–84 years). Previous reports have shown no frequent location in the liver, with a median size of 42.5 mm (range, 8–130 mm). Enhanced CT showed the ring-like pattern of enhancement characteristic of adenocarcinoma in 11 (65%) of 17 cases. The MRI findings of sclerosing hemanigioma were also very different from typical cavernous hemangioma, appearing low on T1-weighted imaging and high on T2-weighted imaging, categorized as non-specific, and still not excluding adenocarcinoma. Such radiological findings might lead to a preoperative diagnosis of hypovascular adenocarcinoma, including metastatic liver cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), IHCC, and FLC. In our case, differentiating the lesions from metastatic liver tumors was quite difficult, because the radiological findings were closely compatible with liver metastases and multiple tumors were evident. An elevated level of CEA in peripheral blood is a strong indicator of hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer. Tartter et al. [18] described the sensitivity and specificity of CEA elevation to >5 ng/ml in patients with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer as 81% and 72%, respectively. Conversely, in our patient, the CEA level remained within normal limits during the course. PET/CT was not performed in this case, but could have detected the likely benign nature of this sclerosing hemangioma. The sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer have been reported as 97% and 76%, respectively [19]. However, PET provides insufficient anatomical information, although this lack of information has improved with the integration of CT into PET. MRI provides additional accuracy to liver contrast-enhanced CT in the assessment of a patient’s suitability for hepatic resection.
Table 1

Cases of resected hepatic screlosing hemangioma in the English literature.

YearAuthorAge/sexLocationSizeCTMRIPreoperative diagnosisOperation
(mm)(T1/T2)
1986Takayasu et al. [3]62 FS650RENANApartial hepatectomy
1992Haratake et al. [4]65 FS826RENAmetastasissubsegmentectomy
HCC
1995Cheng et al. [5]NAS730RElow/malignantliver resection
Slightly hightumor
1995Shim et al. [6]41 FS5/6130PartlyNAangiosarcomaright lobectomy
Filled in
2000Yamashita et al. [7]67 FS450REHigh/highmetastasispartial hepatectomy
2001Aibe et al. [8]67 FS440DelayedHigh/highmetastasispartial hepatectomy
Enhancement
2005Lee et al. [9]65 FS5/6/755RELow/moderateHCC, IHCC,right
atypical hemangiomahemihepatectomy
2008Mori et al. [10]77 FS5/695RELow/highIHCCright
FLChepatectomy
2008Choi et al. [11]63 Mright45Multifocal patchylow/HCC, IHCC,right lobectomy
lobeEnhancementIntermediateatypical hemangioma
2009Lauder et al. [12]72 MS7NAMild contrastNAmetastasispartial hepatectomy
Enhancement
2009Lauder et al. [12]84 MS4NAHypodenseNAmetastasispartial hepatectomy
2010Jin et al. [13]52 MS621RElow/HCCpartial hepatectomy
Slightly highhemangioma
2011Papafragkakis et al. [14]52 FS675IntralesionalNANAlaparoscopic resection
Enhancement
2012Yamada et al. [15]75 MS88RELowmetastasispartial hepatectomy
Slightly high
2013Song et al. [16]63 FS2/391RENANAlateral segmentectomy
2013Shimada et al. [17]63 MS810RELowatypical hemangiomasegmentectomy
Slightly highmetastasis, HCC
2015Wakasugi67 FS1, S611, 28RELow/heterometastasislaparoscopic

RE, ring enhancement.NA, not available.IHCC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma. FLC, fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma.

The second important clinical point is that laparoscopic hepatectomy is useful as a diagnostic therapy for undiagnosed multiple liver tumor. Fine-needle biopsy can differentiate sclerosing hemangioma from colorectal metastasis, but can potentially lead to rupture [20] or seeding of cancer cells. We believe that surgical resection of suspected colorectal metastases in the present patient was safe, and provided both a diagnosis and a solution to cancer therapy. With the progress of surgical techniques and devices, laparoscopic hepatectomy has become a realizable option for patients with liver tumors. Iwahashi et al. [2] reported that blood loss was significantly less with laparoscopic hepatectomy than with open hepatectomy, and the hospital stay with laparoscopic hepatectomy tended to be shorter. Regarding long-term outcomes, they found no significant differences in overall or disease-free survival between the laparoscopic and open hepatectomy groups. The pathological findings in this case indicate that our patient did not need surgical intervention, but laparoscopic partial hepatectomy provided less blood loss, a shorter duration of hospitalization, and good cosmetic results, and also proved useful in diagnostic therapy.

Conclusion

Sclerosing hemangioma should be included among the differential diagnoses of multiple liver tumors in patients with colorectal cancer. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is useful for diagnostic therapy for undiagnosed multiple liver tumors.

Conflict of interest

Masaki Wakasugi and the other co-authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Funding

None.

Ethical approval

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for the information to be included in our manuscript. Her information has been de-identified to the best of our ability to protect his privacy.

Author contributions

Each author participated in writing the manuscript and all agreed to accept equal responsibility for the accuracy of the content of the paper.
  20 in total

1.  Laparoscopic hepatic resection for metastatic liver tumor of colorectal cancer: comparative analysis of short- and long-term results.

Authors:  Shuichi Iwahashi; Mitsuo Shimada; Tohru Utsunomiya; Satoru Imura; Yuji Morine; Tetsuya Ikemoto; Yusuke Arakawa; Hiroki Mori; Mami Kanamoto; Shinichiro Yamada
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Case report. Sclerosing liver haemangioma with pericapillary smooth muscle proliferation: atypical CT and MR findings with pathological correlation.

Authors:  Y J Choi; K W Kim; E-Y Cha; J-S Song; E Yu; M-G Lee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Hyalinized liver hemangioma mimicking malignant tumor at MR imaging.

Authors:  H C Cheng; S H Tsai; J H Chiang; C Y Chang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Atypical radiographic findings in hepatic cavernous hemangioma: correlation with histologic features.

Authors:  K Takayasu; N Moriyama; Y Shima; Y Muramatsu; T Yamada; M Makuuchi; S Yamasaki; S Hirohashi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Sclerosing hemangioma in the liver.

Authors:  Yong Moon Shin
Journal:  Korean J Hepatol       Date:  2011-09

6.  Sclerosed hemangioma of the liver.

Authors:  So Young Jin
Journal:  Korean J Hepatol       Date:  2010-12

7.  Sclerosed hemangioma of the liver.

Authors:  H Aibe; H Hondo; T Kuroiwa; K Yoshimitsu; H Irie; T Tajima; K Shinozaki; Y Asayama; K Taguchi; K Masuda
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

8.  Hepatic sclerosing hemangioma mimicking a metastatic liver tumor: report of a case.

Authors:  Y Yamashita; M Shimada; K Taguchi; T Gion; H Hasegawa; T Utsunomiya; T Hamatsu; T Matsumata; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Hyalinized hemangioma of the liver.

Authors:  J Haratake; A Horie; Y Nagafuchi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Sclerosing haemangiomas of the liver: two cases of mistaken identity.

Authors:  C Lauder; G Garcea; H Kanhere; G J Maddern
Journal:  HPB Surg       Date:  2009-12-29
View more
  6 in total

1.  Hepatic Sclerosing Hemangioma with Predominance of the Sclerosed Area Mimicking a Biliary Cystadenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Sugo; Yuki Sekine; Shozo Miyano; Ikuo Watanobe; Michio Machida; Kuniaki Kojima; Hironao Okubo; Ayako Ura; Kanako Ogura; Toshiharu Matsumoto
Journal:  Case Reports Hepatol       Date:  2018-10-04

2.  Hepatic Sclerosing Hemangioma Mimicking Malignancy: A Case and Literature Review.

Authors:  Tian Li; Miriam M Klar; Mouyed Alawad; Rishard Abdul; Ayesha Zahiruddin; Moro O Salifu; Isabel M McFarlane
Journal:  Am J Med Case Rep       Date:  2020-12-30

3.  Atypical hepatic hemangioma: imaging features of hyalinized hemangioma.

Authors:  Letícia Maria Araujo Oliveira Nunes; Caroline Duarte de Mello-Amoedo; Fernando Ide Yamauchi; Ronaldo Hueb Baroni
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2018-06-11

4.  Preoperative diagnosis of the sclerosed hemangioma of the liver using multimodality imaging findings: A case report.

Authors:  Kumi Ozaki; Jun Yoshikawa; Toru Yamamoto; Kazuya Maeda; Yasuharu Kaizaki
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2018-06-01

Review 5.  One stop shop approach for the diagnosis of liver hemangioma.

Authors:  Larisa Daniela Sandulescu; Cristiana Marinela Urhut; Sarmis Marian Sandulescu; Ana-Maria Ciurea; Sergiu Marian Cazacu; Sevastita Iordache
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2021-12-27

6.  Hepatic sclerosed hemangioma and sclerosing cavernous hemangioma: a radiological study.

Authors:  Cuiyu Jia; Guangxue Liu; Xinxin Wang; Dawei Zhao; Ruili Li; Hongjun Li
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.374

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.