| Literature DB >> 25679153 |
Akmal Sabarudin1, Zakira Mustafa, Khadijah Mohd Nassir, Hamzaini Abdul Hamid, Zhonghua Sun.
Abstract
This phantom study was designed to compare the radiation dose in thoracic and abdomen-pelvic CT scans with and without use of tube current modulation (TCM). Effective dose (ED) and size-specific dose estimation (SSDE) were calculated with the absorbed doses measured at selective radiosensitive organs using a thermoluminescence dosimeter-100 (TLD-100). When compared to protocols without TCM, the ED and SSDE were reduced significantly with use of TCM for both the thoracic and abdomen-pelvic CT. With use of TCM, the ED was 6.50 ± 0.29 mSv for thoracic and 6.01 ± 0.20 mSv for the abdomen-pelvic CT protocols. However without use of TCM, the ED was 20.07 ± 0.24 mSv and 17.30 ± 0.41 mSv for the thoracic and abdomen-pelvic CT protocols, respectively. The corresponding SSDE was 10.18 ± 0.48 mGy and 11.96 ± 0.27 mGy for the thoracic and abdomen-pelvic CT protocols with TCM, and 31.56 ± 0.43 mGy and 33.23 ± 0.05 mGy for thoracic and abdomen-pelvic CT protocols without TCM, respectively. The highest absorbed dose was measured at the breast with 8.58 ± 0.12 mGy in the TCM protocols and 51.52 ± 14.72 mGy in the protocols without TCM during thoracic CT. In the abdomen-pelvic CT, the absorbed dose was highest at the skin with 9.30 ± 1.28mGy and 29.99 ± 2.23 mGy in protocols with and without use of TCM, respectively. In conclusion, the TCM technique results in significant dose reduction; thus it is to be highly recommended in routine thoracic and abdomen-pelvic CT.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25679153 PMCID: PMC5689995 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5135
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys ISSN: 1526-9914 Impact factor: 2.102
Figure 1Image showing that the TLDs were securely placed on the skin surface of the anthropomorphic male Alderson RANDO phantom at the targeted radiosensitive organs.
Thoracic and abdomen–pelvic CT protocols
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Collimation (mm) |
|
|
|
|
| Scanning mode | Helical | Helical | Helical | Helical |
| Slice thickness (mm) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 10 | 10 |
| Pitch | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Rotation time (s) | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Tube voltage (kV) | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 |
| Tube current time (mAs) |
| 317 |
| 300 |
| Scan time (s) | 12.07 | 12.05 | 12.69 | 12.66 |
| Scan length (mm) | 389.0 | 389.0 | 410.0 | 410.0 |
| Orientation | Head first | Head first | Head first | Head first |
.
Mean radiation doses from thoracic and abdomen–pelvic CT
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ED (mSv) |
|
|
|
|
| SSDE (mGy) |
|
|
|
|
.
Figure 2Absorbed dose of radiosensitive organs: (a) from the thoracic CT examination. The graph shows that the breast received the highest dose in both the protocols with and without TCM compared to that received by other radiosensitive organs during the thoracic CT procedure. In fact, the breast absorbed approximately four times more when no TCM protocol was used. Absorbed dose of radiosensitive organs: (b) from the abdomen‐pelvic CT examination. The graph shows that without TCM, the skin absorbed the most radiation dose during the abdomen–pelvic CT procedure. However, with TCM, the highest absorbed dose was reported at the colon. In this CT examination, the thyroid absorbed the lowest radiation dose in both protocols with and without TCM.