Literature DB >> 25678939

NONPARAMETRIC INFERENCE PROCEDURE FOR PERCENTILES OF THE RANDOM EFFECTS DISTRIBUTION IN META-ANALYSIS.

Rui Wang1, Lu Tian2, Tianxi Cai1, L J Wei1.   

Abstract

To investigate whether treating cancer patients with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) would increase the mortality risk, Bennett et al. [Journal of the American Medical Association299 (2008) 914-924] conducted a meta-analysis with the data from 52 phase III trials comparing ESAs with placebo or standard of care. With a standard parametric random effects modeling approach, the study concluded that ESA administration was significantly associated with increased average mortality risk. In this article we present a simple nonparametric inference procedure for the distribution of the random effects. We re-analyzed the ESA mortality data with the new method. Our results about the center of the random effects distribution were markedly different from those reported by Bennett et al. Moreover, our procedure, which estimates the distribution of the random effects, as opposed to just a simple population average, suggests that the ESA may be beneficial to mortality for approximately a quarter of the study populations. This new meta-analysis technique can be implemented with study-level summary statistics. In contrast to existing methods for parametric random effects models, the validity of our proposal does not require the number of studies involved to be large. From the results of an extensive numerical study, we find that the new procedure performs well even with moderate individual study sample sizes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bivariate beta; conditional permutation test; erythropoiesis-stimulating agents; logit-normal; two-level hierachical model

Year:  2010        PMID: 25678939      PMCID: PMC4321956          DOI: 10.1214/09-AOAS280SUPP

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Appl Stat        ISSN: 1932-6157            Impact factor:   2.083


  23 in total

1.  A comparison of statistical methods for meta-analysis.

Authors:  S E Brockwell; I R Gordon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A refined method for the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials with binary outcome.

Authors:  J Hartung; G Knapp
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.

Authors:  N MANTEL; W HAENSZEL
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update.

Authors:  Rebecca DerSimonian; Raghu Kacker
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.

Authors:  Kurex Sidik; Jeffrey N Jonkman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wolfgang Viechtbauer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Exact and efficient inference procedure for meta-analysis and its application to the analysis of independent 2 x 2 tables with all available data but without artificial continuity correction.

Authors:  Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai; Marc A Pfeffer; Nikita Piankov; Pierre-Yves Cremieux; L J Wei
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 5.899

8.  SEMIPARAMETRIC TRANSFORMATION MODELS WITH RANDOM EFFECTS FOR CLUSTERED FAILURE TIME DATA.

Authors:  Donglin Zeng; D Y Lin; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 1.261

9.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

Review 10.  Venous thromboembolism and mortality associated with recombinant erythropoietin and darbepoetin administration for the treatment of cancer-associated anemia.

Authors:  Charles L Bennett; Samuel M Silver; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Athena T Samaras; C Anthony Blau; Kara J Gleason; Sara E Barnato; Kathleen M Elverman; D Mark Courtney; June M McKoy; Beatrice J Edwards; Cara C Tigue; Dennis W Raisch; Paul R Yarnold; David A Dorr; Timothy M Kuzel; Martin S Tallman; Steven M Trifilio; Dennis P West; Stephen Y Lai; Michael Henke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  4 in total

1.  Exact inference on the random-effects model for meta-analyses with few studies.

Authors:  Haben Michael; Suzanne Thornton; Minge Xie; Lu Tian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Random-effects meta-analysis of combined outcomes based on reconstructions of individual patient data.

Authors:  Yue Song; Feng Sun; Susan Redline; Rui Wang
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 5.273

3.  On random-effects meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Zeng; D Y Lin
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.445

4.  Robust Metrics and Sensitivity Analyses for Meta-analyses of Heterogeneous Effects.

Authors:  Maya B Mathur; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.860

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.