| Literature DB >> 25678756 |
Toshiaki Tanaka1, Susumu Yokoya2, Yoshiki Seino3, Hiroshi Tada4, Jun Mishina5, Takahiro Sato6, Shintaro Hiro6, Nobuhiko Ohki6.
Abstract
The safety and effectiveness of long-term (10-yr) GH treatment in short Japanese children born small for gestational age (SGA) were evaluated based on interim data analysis from a clinical study, including the findings concerning the influence on the onset of puberty and subjects who achieved near adult height (NAH). Sixty-one subjects were analyzed at baseline in this study. Eleven subjects (6 boys and 5 girls) achieved NAH (mean 157.4 cm and 145.5 cm, respectively), and the Δ height SDS from the start of GH treatment was +1.6 in boys and +1.8 in girls. The median age (yr) at onset of puberty was 11.4 in boys and 9.9 in girls, comparable to healthy children. However, the mean height (cm) at onset of puberty (137.0 in boys; 125.5 in girls) was shorter than that of healthy children. Treatment-related adverse events were generally mild to moderate in severity; however, adenoidal hypertrophy was observed in two subjects as a serious adverse event. One subject had jaw malformation related to GH treatment at a dose of 0.067 mg/kg/d. No notable changes in HbA1c levels were observed, and the levels remained within the reference range. We have confirmed the safety and effectiveness of long-term GH treatment through this ongoing clinical study.Entities:
Keywords: adult height; long-term GH treatment; pubertal onset; short stature; small for gestational age (SGA)
Year: 2015 PMID: 25678756 PMCID: PMC4322289 DOI: 10.1297/cpe.24.15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Pediatr Endocrinol ISSN: 0918-5739
Clinical characteristics at birth and start of GH treatment
Achievement of near adult height in subjects
Fig. 1.Changes in height velocity.
Fig. 2.Changes in height SDS.
Fig. 3.Changes in BMI-SDS.
Fig. 4.Cumulative percentage of subjects who entered puberty.
Fig.
5.Plot chart of pubertal onset age and height.
Treatment-related adverse eventsFrequency of adverse drug reactions in this long-term study (10 years)
Fig. 6.Changes in bone age/chronological age.