Literature DB >> 25678327

Gagging Problem Assessment: a re-evaluation.

G F E C van Linden van den Heuvell1, B de Boer1,2, B J Ter Pelkwijk2, M M Bildt3,4, B Stegenga1.   

Abstract

The Gagging Problem Assessment (GPA) is an instrument to evaluate dental gagging. Although the GPA seemed to be reliable and valid in a pilot study, a replication study with more subjects was needed. Based on the pilot study, the number of items was reduced, resulting in the revised version of the GPA (GPA-R). The aims of this study were to replicate the reliability of the GPA-R and to investigate the correlation between dental gagging and general anxiety. Dental gagging patients (n = 59) were compared with a control group (n = 17) at t0 and 3 weeks later. The 'gagging group' also filled in the SCL-90 anxiety scale. Gagging-specific homogenous domains and internal consistency were determined. Stability and distinguishing capacity of the GPA-R were assessed. SCL-90-Anxiety scores were compared with standard values in a non-clinical population. The GPA-R patient part was able to reliably discriminate between the absence or the presence of dental gagging. However, the reliability of the GPA-R-dentist part was insufficient. The GPA-R seems to be sensitive to subtle differences in acts of the dentists. To overcome these problems, more detailed and explicit instructions on how to use the GPA-R should be formulated and more specific gagging stimuli should be included. The 'gagging group' reported 'fear of choking' significantly more often than the control group (P = 0·008). This finding might be important for the treatment of dental gagging. Considering the outcome of our study, development of a new diagnostic gagging tool needs another approach that focuses on gagging severity.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gagging; oral health; oral physiology; oral rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25678327     DOI: 10.1111/joor.12280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  2 in total

1.  Cleaning the palate and tongue without nausea: a mixed methods study exploring the appropriate depth and direction of oral care.

Authors:  Yang Cheng; Yu-Feng Zhou; Ya-Ping Ding; Ying Xing; Enfang Shan; Hang Sun
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  Effectiveness of Intellectual Distraction on Gagging and Anxiety Management in Children: A Prospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  Nahla Nassif Debs; Samia Aboujaoude
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2017-12-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.