Literature DB >> 25676611

Monitoring lumbar plexus integrity in extreme lateral transpsoas approaches to the lumbar spine: a new protocol with anatomical bases.

Mariana Bendersky1, Carlos Solá, Javier Muntadas, Marcelo Gruenberg, Silvana Calligaris, Maximiliano Mereles, Marcelo Valacco, Julio Bassani, Matías Nicolás.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: XLIF is an increasingly popular procedure that requires traversing the psoas, with the potential risk of injuring the lumbar plexus nerves. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) is, therefore, critical in this kind of procedures; nevertheless, there were some reports of neural damage.
PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of a new protocol for IOM during XLIF.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, nonrandomized, institutional review board-approved study enrolled adult patients of both sexes undergoing XLIF at the Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires between 2012 and 2014. Preoperative and immediate postoperative neurological examinations were carried out, paying special attention to lumbar plexus motor and sensory territories. IOM included EMG and transpsoas stimulation, considering the territories of every motor and sensory branch of the lumbar plexus.
RESULTS: 107 patients (133 lumbar levels) were evaluated. Reproducible responses were obtained in the collateral and terminal branches of the lumbar plexus, which were well preserved. No patient (0%) had new motor postoperative deficits. Nineteen (17.75%) patients had minor and transient sensory symptoms, lasting less than a month. One patient (0.93%) had longer duration of sensory complaints (3 months).
CONCLUSION: A detailed IOM of lumbar plexus branches can determine in real time the proximity of intrapsoas nerves during XLIF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25676611     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3801-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  34 in total

1.  An anatomic study of the lumbar plexus with respect to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Takatomo Moro; Shin-ichi Kikuchi; Shin-ichi Konno; Hiroyuki Yaginuma
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases.

Authors:  W Blake Rodgers; Edward J Gerber; Jamie Patterson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Lumbar fusion in octogenarians: the promise of minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  William Blake Rodgers; Edward J Gerber; Jody A Rodgers
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Trajectory of the main sensory and motor branches of the lumbar plexus outside the psoas muscle related to the lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach.

Authors:  Elias Dakwar; Fernando L Vale; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-01-07

Review 5.  Multimodal intraoperative monitoring: an overview and proposal of methodology based on 1,017 cases.

Authors:  Martin Sutter; Andreas Eggspuehler; Alfred Muller; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Nerve injury during the transpsoas approach for lumbar fusion.

Authors:  John K Houten; Lucien C Alexandre; Rani Nasser; Adam L Wollowick
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-05-27

7.  Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review.

Authors:  Jim A Youssef; Paul C McAfee; Catherine A Patty; Erin Raley; Spencer DeBauche; Erin Shucosky; Liana Chotikul
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Analysis of lumbar plexopathies and nerve injury after lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: diagnostic standardization.

Authors:  Amir Ahmadian; Armen R Deukmedjian; Naomi Abel; Elias Dakwar; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-12-21

9.  Motor nerve injuries following the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach.

Authors:  Kevin S Cahill; Joseph L Martinez; Michael Y Wang; Steven Vanni; Allan D Levi
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-06-29

10.  The diagnostic value of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during spine surgery: a prospective study of 1,017 patients.

Authors:  Martin Sutter; Andreas Eggspuehler; Dieter Grob; Dezsoe Jeszenszky; Arnaldo Benini; François Porchet; Alfred Mueller; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  10 in total

1.  Multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring in extreme lateral interbody fusion. Transcranial electrical stimulation as indispensable rearview.

Authors:  Hanneke I Berends; Henricus L Journée; Ilona Rácz; Jan van Loon; Roger Härtl; Maarten Spruit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Perioperative Complications in 255 Patients Who Underwent Lateral Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LaLIF) Surgery.

Authors:  Jiaming Cui; Xingyu Guo; Zhaomin Zheng; Hui Liu; Hua Wang; Zemin Li; Jianru Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Can triggered electromyography monitoring throughout retraction predict postoperative symptomatic neuropraxia after XLIF? Results from a prospective multicenter trial.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Robert E Isaacs; Jim A Youssef; Kaveh Khajavi; Jeffrey R Balzer; Adam S Kanter; Fabrice A Küelling; Mark D Peterson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lumbar plexus nervous distortion in XLIF® approach: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Carlo Mandelli; Elena Virginia Colombo; Giovanni Marco Sicuri; Pietro Mortini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Comparison of ALIF vs. XLIF for L4/5 interbody fusion: pros, cons, and literature review.

Authors:  Mark J Winder; Shanu Gambhir
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03

6.  Morphometric anatomy of the lumbar sympathetic trunk with respect to the anterolateral approach to lumbar interbody fusion: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Gareth Rutter; Kevin Phan; Adam Smith; Fiona Stewart; Kevin Seex; Cristian Gragnaniello
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 7.  Lumbar spinal fusion in the outpatient setting: an update on management, surgical approaches and planning.

Authors:  Bryce A Basques; Joseph Ferguson; Kyle N Kunze; Frank M Phillips
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

8.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF): An Update.

Authors:  Oded Rabau; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Mina Aziz; Alisson Teles; Susan Mengxiao Ge; Javier Quillo-Olvera; Jean Ouellet
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

9.  Decreased estimated blood loss in lateral trans-psoas versus anterior approach to lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Jayme Koltsov; Tianyi Wang; Grace Xiong; Karthik Nathan; Ivan Cheng
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

10.  Imaging Anatomical Research on the Operative Windows of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Liehua Liu; Yong Liang; Hong Zhang; Haoming Wang; Congtao Guo; Xiaobing Pu; Chengmin Zhang; Liyuan Wang; Jian Wang; Yingwen Lv; Zhoukui Ren; Qiang Zhou; Zhongliang Deng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.